Mulligan
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 9,343
ziggy29 said:If you don't join the exchange, you could have to pay way more than 9.5% of your income in premiums. If that is the case for someone, why pay (say) 15-20% of your income in premiums by keeping your old plan when you can pay 9.5% (or less) through the exchange?
There are certainly a few situations where someone would want to pay (possibly a lot) more and keep their current coverage. But if a couple earns $40K and they can either pay $12,000 a year to "keep their plan" or $3,000 a year through the exchange (after subsidy)... what am I missing?
Now that Megacorp has kicked me to the curb, I'm doing the math and seeing that our situation will be fairly close to the hypothetical above. In any event, it looks like we'll be getting an 8-month short term policy to bridge the gap between Megacorp and Obamacare (at 1/3 the cost of COBRA and almost as much coverage), as preexisting condition exclusions and avoiding gaps in "creditable coverage" for the purposes of HIPAA aren't really factors any more as long as you can make it to January 2014 before they become relevant.
You may very well be correct, as I am seeing it through the prism of what I pay and earn. I pay $76 a month as a 48 yr. old with a $5500 deductible. I have no health issues and with my HSA deduction, I actually net out a small profit just by buying health insurance. I was assuming just for my individual plan, and the fact it's underwritten makes it significantly cheaper. But maybe there are a bunch of people in my plan that would benefit. But it is sure hard to beat paying $76, and it has only went up a couple bucks the past 3 years. So, yes this unfolding is making me very nervous.