Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Health Plans Up Significantly in 2014
Old 03-22-2013, 01:12 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Colorado Mountains
Posts: 3,165
Health Plans Up Significantly in 2014

An article in today's Wall Street Journal said individual health plans could go up as much as 116% at the extreme with 40% to 50% more the norm.

Health Insurers Warn on Premiums - WSJ.com

The article talks about what the large insurance companies are telling their brokers.

If your income is too high for assistance, this could hurt.
Hermit is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-22-2013, 01:22 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
timo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bernalillo, NM
Posts: 2,717
That's an excellent alarmist piece based on third hand conversations. It's sad what has happened to the WSJ. I used to subscribe, but the in-depth reporting is not what it used to be.
timo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 01:29 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 414
too bad it is true though
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it.
mickj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 01:38 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by timo2
That's an excellent alarmist piece based on third hand conversations. It's sad what has happened to the WSJ. I used to subscribe, but the in-depth reporting is not what it used to be.
It is certainly conjecture at this point, but I have been noticing more than one of these types of articles. Of course the subsidized individuals won't notice, but the ones paying full freight would. This is just my opinion/concern, but it makes perfect since that the unhealthy ones will jump on this immediately, while the others may be slow to join. I am on a grandfathered individual plan, and I am sure any healthy person already on one of these will not be joining the exchange if they can help it. I have read several articles that are worrying that the influx of healthy and/or young people isn't going to come to help balance the cost out. I guess we will find out in the coming year. One thing is for sure, I hope I am not dragged into the exchange.
Mulligan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 02:13 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
timo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bernalillo, NM
Posts: 2,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulligan View Post
It is certainly conjecture at this point, but I have been noticing more than one of these types of articles. Of course the subsidized individuals won't notice, but the ones paying full freight would. This is just my opinion/concern, but it makes perfect since that the unhealthy ones will jump on this immediately, while the others may be slow to join. I am on a grandfathered individual plan, and I am sure any healthy person already on one of these will not be joining the exchange if they can help it. I have read several articles that are worrying that the influx of healthy and/or young people isn't going to come to help balance the cost out. I guess we will find out in the coming year. One thing is for sure, I hope I am not dragged into the exchange.
I won't have to use an exchange either. What concerns me, since I prefer the private industry approach, is that the companies will misbehave and create a clamor for a government approach to counter them. It's that 'killing the goose that lays the golden eggs' thing
timo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 02:21 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by timo2 View Post
I won't have to use an exchange either. What concerns me, since I prefer the private industry approach, is that the companies will misbehave and create a clamor for a government approach to counter them. It's that 'killing the goose that lays the golden eggs' thing
I would think that the benefits ratio test would prevent any misbehavior. What would be gained by overstating premiums if it would 1) make you less competitive for 2014 and 2) if you overcharge you'll just need to refund the excess in 2015?
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 02:33 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
timo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Bernalillo, NM
Posts: 2,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
I would think that the benefits ratio test would prevent any misbehavior. What would be gained by overstating premiums if it would 1) make you less competitive for 2014 and 2) if you overcharge you'll just need to refund the excess in 2015?

So maybe it is an unfounded fear. won't be the last time for me either .

But I do know two things 1) perception is reality 2) Alarmists are always right, it just depends on which one of the thousands of alarmists that is. So if people get the wrong perception from the right alarmist (what are the odds?)...OK I'll stop.
timo2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 02:49 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
walkinwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,505
There are so many inexpensive but severely limited plans in the individual health insurance market today. Maybe when these go away next year, the average cost will increase.

Every article is so blatantly lopsided in its coverage that it is hard to know what to believe. I decided not to worry about this until about October & then we'll all have a better idea of what's going to happen next year.
walkinwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 02:59 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkinwood View Post
There are so many inexpensive but severely limited plans in the individual health insurance market today. Maybe when these go away next year, the average cost will increase.

Every article is so blatantly lopsided in its coverage that it is hard to know what to believe. I decided not to worry about this until about October & then we'll all have a better idea of what's going to happen next year.
+1.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 07:00 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
I would think that the benefits ratio test would prevent any misbehavior. What would be gained by overstating premiums if it would 1) make you less competitive for 2014 and 2) if you overcharge you'll just need to refund the excess in 2015?
Although the benefits test seems like a good idea to me, I'm not sure how they will prevent accounting games to reduce the amount of profit on paper.
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 07:16 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoguy View Post
Although the benefits test seems like a good idea to me, I'm not sure how they will prevent accounting games to reduce the amount of profit on paper.
Insurance companies are highly regulated and the state regulators go over their books all the time, especially when annual rate increases are applied for. I don't think it will be a problem.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 07:20 PM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Live And Learn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 1,866
Ut oh - the sky is falling again. Watch out for asteroids !
__________________
"For the time being no discipline brings joy, but seems grievous and painful; but afterwards it yields a peaceable fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it." ~
Hebrews 12:11

ER'd in June 2015 at age 52. Initial WR 3%. 50/40/10 (Equity/Bond/Short Term) AA.
Live And Learn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 08:11 PM   #13
Full time employment: Posting here.
fisherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 500
Isn't the WSJ part of the FOX empire? The slant is very similiar.
__________________
Worked the plan and now living the Dream!
fisherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 08:48 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Insurance companies are highly regulated and the state regulators go over their books all the time, especially when annual rate increases are applied for. I don't think it will be a problem.
I hope you are right. I keep thinking of public companies, who financials should be highly reviewed, yet the number of restatements/errors is astounding.
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 09:23 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoguy View Post
I hope you are right. I keep thinking of public companies, who financials should be highly reviewed, yet the number of restatements/errors is astounding.
Insurance operating companies are required to file quarterly and annual financial statements with state insurance regulators. These books are done according to statutory accounting principles (SAP) rather than GAAP. SAP is very close to liquidation accounting (rather than "going concern" accrual basis found in GAAP) which is very conservative and insurers are not permitted anywhere near as much judgement in arriving at their SAP financials as is the case with GAAP. The statutory finanical statements are very detailed. For example, the insurers must disclose every single investment they have on the books down to the individual CUSIP level. Not to say there have not been cases where fudging happens, but it is harder to do when filing insurance regulatory financial statements. The state regulators can then pore over the details if they have reason to believe an insurer has been playing games.

There are lots of issues with the healthcare insurance market, but this is unlikely to be one of them.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2013, 11:09 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by photoguy View Post
Although the benefits test seems like a good idea to me, I'm not sure how they will prevent accounting games to reduce the amount of profit on paper.
There will be specific definitions of what can and cannot be included in the numerator and the denominator. I know that when I retired the industry and regulators were working out the details. I don't think you concern is valid.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 05:05 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,733
It makes sense that rates should rise.
  • The elimination of lifetime caps
  • Not being able to screen people for pre existing conditions
  • limitations of being able to increase rates based on age
  • Substantially increasing the procedure and benefits (e.g. free contraception.)


All of these increase the cost for an insurance company to provide medical insurance. Now the quality of the product is higher so it certainly makes sense for the cost to be.


How much of an increase in premium we will see I have no idea, but they almost certainly will rise.
clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 05:24 AM   #18
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by clifp View Post
It makes sense that rates should rise.
  • The elimination of lifetime caps
  • Not being able to screen people for pre existing conditions
  • limitations of being able to increase rates based on age
  • Substantially increasing the procedure and benefits (e.g. free contraception.)


All of these increase the cost for an insurance company to provide medical insurance. Now the quality of the product is higher so it certainly makes sense for the cost to be.


How much of an increase in premium we will see I have no idea, but they almost certainly will rise.
Given that we are spending 17% of GDP already, premiums don't need to increase. Because there is so much cost shifting and cross product subsidization, they do probably need to reallocate.
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 08:41 AM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
photoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,301
brewer/p4b

Thanks for highlighting the difference in accounting standards. That makes sense to me.
photoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2013, 10:52 AM   #20
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Live And Learn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
Insurance operating companies are required to file quarterly and annual financial statements with state insurance regulators. These books are done according to statutory accounting principles (SAP) rather than GAAP. <snip>
There are lots of issues with the healthcare insurance market, but this is unlikely to be one of them.
Great info ! Thank you for posting this. I'm an accountant and I didn't realize there was a difference in accounting methodologies. I just learned something
__________________
"For the time being no discipline brings joy, but seems grievous and painful; but afterwards it yields a peaceable fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it." ~
Hebrews 12:11

ER'd in June 2015 at age 52. Initial WR 3%. 50/40/10 (Equity/Bond/Short Term) AA.
Live And Learn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
obamacare


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.