Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Implications of ACA for low-budget ER
Old 07-22-2012, 08:28 AM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
Implications of ACA for low-budget ER

Like many here my wife and I have been following the ongoing saga of the Affordable Care Act AKA Obamacare with much interest. Reading these forums I feel like we're part of a small minority not only in not having group health insurance from a megacorp but also in living on considerably less than many seem to spend on health insurance premiums alone.

We've been very fortunate in having no major medical stuff so far and have gotten by with ultra high-deductible (10K per person) plans costing us ~$220-300 total per month (I'm 55, DW is 49). Since we live off of assets only and are frugal our taxable income each year is way below federal poverty guidelines, making us elibigible for Medicaid coverage in 2014 according to ACA.

So as things stand now (realizing the upcoming elections could change everything) this is the way I read things: we pay the premiums for our current bare bones/catastrohpic coverage through 2013, are then able to use Medicaid as our catastrophic coverarage starting in 2014, but once we hit age 65 we need to budget for Medicare and Medigap premiums as "normal" Medicaid has means/asset tests which we'd clearly fail. This all sounds too crazy and complicated to be true, but based on a careful reading of the info put out by Kaiser Foundation and others this is what I'm thinking is the case. Comments?
kevink is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-22-2012, 09:27 AM   #2
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,590
kevink, the medicaid expansion is by state and is voluntary. So far not every state has committed to it and some have indicated they will not participate. This depends on your state and how it determines eligibility. See here for a KFF overview of the medicaid expansion.

Edit: here's a link from the PPACA thread to a USA Today story that summarizes the implementation efforts by state http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...tes/55889922/1
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 09:29 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
I think you should read the whole thread that was recently made a sticky thread on this topic. It should address your concerns and, if not, you should ask there so your expansion will be added to the sticky.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 09:58 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,746
I have the same question about medicare for those age 65 and over and how it is impacted by the Obamacare. I am helping my father in law get set up with an appropriate medicare plan since he is turning 65 soon. They are very low income and have no assets outside of a couple thousand in bank account, a few old vehicles, and limited personal property. It seems like my MIL who will still be under age 65 in 2014 will get heavily subsidized health insurance from the exchanges or free medicaid, but upon turning 65 she will have to deal with medicare, medigap, and Part D coverage or a medicare advantage plan? Looks like premiums for those options are 4-5x what they might pay for the subsidized exchange HI at age 64, but I am not certain that incongruous treatment is what will actually happen.
__________________
Retired in 2013 at age 33. Keeping busy reading, blogging, relaxing, gaming, and enjoying the outdoors with my wife and 3 kids (8, 13, and 15).
FUEGO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 10:42 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
John Galt III's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,782
kevink, I will be 59 when 1/1/2014 rolls around. From what I have read, I will be able to then enroll in Medicaid (for free, I think), under the ACA. I have assets, but will have income below $10,000 per year then, if I quit my job. I live in Pa. We are participating in the exchanges, and if I want non-medicaid coverage (supposedly better) from the exchange, I will need to get a part time job to increase my income above whatever the threshold is. The non-medicaid coverage would be heavily subsidized. I would only pay about $50 a month.
John Galt III is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 10:57 AM   #6
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,590
Here's a link (not verified) dated 7/5 that summarizes each state's current status just on the Medicaid expansion. Where each state stands on ACA's Medicaid expansion - The Advisory Board Daily Briefing

It shows:

Participating California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Vermont, Washington

Will not participateFlorida, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina,Texas

Leaning toward not participatingIowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey

Leaning toward participating Arkansas, Oregon, Rhode Island


The rest are undecided.
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 01:43 PM   #7
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
Thanks all for the feedback. I have been keeping up with the ongoing story of the individual State's decisions, and have found the Kaiser Foundation site to be the single most useful resource on this topic and on ACA in general:

http://healthreform.kff.org/the-states.aspx


We wouldn't consider living anyplace that didn't participate in the program. New Mexico is our most likely long-term destination and they already have more doctors and clinics that accept Medicaid than any other place we've lived (large % of the population living on very little and a dyed-in-the-wool "blue" state their current Republican governor notwithstanding.

Clearly one is rolling the dice to some extent no matter what as the health care system and costs will remain in crisis regardless.

donheff I don't see a sticky on this topic but have read as much as I can find on it in this forum. Would welcome any more info.
kevink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 04:04 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
teejayevans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Galt III View Post
kevink, I will be 59 when 1/1/2014 rolls around. From what I have read, I will be able to then enroll in Medicaid (for free, I think), under the ACA. I have assets, but will have income below $10,000 per year then, if I quit my job. I live in Pa. We are participating in the exchanges, and if I want non-medicaid coverage (supposedly better) from the exchange, I will need to get a part time job to increase my income above whatever the threshold is. The non-medicaid coverage would be heavily subsidized. I would only pay about $50 a month.
I believe the medicaid/exchanges are only for those who can't get coverage through their employer (or COBRA), so if you quit your job, you'll be on COBRA for 18 months, then if your insurance company doesn't offer to convert the policy to an individual policy, only then does the ACA affect you.
TJ
teejayevans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 04:28 PM   #9
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 807
We've been ER'd for some time and never had COBRA, so in our case the exchanges would be a viable option. Where I see this as a game-changer is for people like ourselves needing to make it on the kind of modest incomes that would otherwise necessitate either going without coverage and risking ruin or moving to a place like Mexico or Thailand with affordable out-of-pocket costs until reaching age 65. Given what's happened with employment, retirement account balances post-crash and housing values I would think the number of boomers in this boat, though small, is probably growing.
kevink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2012, 08:44 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
John Galt III's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans View Post
I believe the medicaid/exchanges are only for those who can't get coverage through their employer (or COBRA), so if you quit your job, you'll be on COBRA for 18 months, then if your insurance company doesn't offer to convert the policy to an individual policy, only then does the ACA affect you.
TJ
In my particular case, if I were to quit, I would probably go on COBRA since it would only be $385 a month. However, I could refuse COBRA, as far as I know, go without health ins, or buy my own individual policy, until 1/1/2014, then sign up for medicaid / subsidized exchange.I don't think you are forced too keep your existing health ins if you want to go onto ACA 1/1/2014.
John Galt III is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 05:24 AM   #11
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,590
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevink View Post

donheff I don't see a sticky on this topic but have read as much as I can find on it in this forum. Would welcome any more info.
We recently had a long discussion which was moved to the FAQ section. You can read it here: http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...act-61961.html
MichaelB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 07:17 AM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
teejayevans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Galt III View Post
In my particular case, if I were to quit, I would probably go on COBRA since it would only be $385 a month. However, I could refuse COBRA, as far as I know, go without health ins, or buy my own individual policy, until 1/1/2014, then sign up for medicaid / subsidized exchange.I don't think you are forced too keep your existing health ins if you want to go onto ACA 1/1/2014.
If you refused COBRA, you will also lose out on eligibility for HIPAA insurance (insurance for those who can't get insurance because of pre-existing conditions, kicks in after COBRA). I would only refuse COBRA if I had already applied and been accepted for individual insurance.
Also remember that the individual policy you will have will not be the same as the policy you will get in the exchanges (so called Silver plans), you may want to stay with your plan because of better coverage or better network of doctors, etc
TJ
teejayevans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.