Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:29 PM   #21
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 851
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

I know at the doctors office I go to, 30-35% of the patients seen there are on Masshealth (massachusetts "free" health care for poor folks). They come in, see the same doctors as me(sometimes better since my plan doesn't cover dental and Masshealth does), have pretty much the same choices I have, and presumably get the same care, and the same experience as I do....this is a "government run" health care system on a small scale.

I just don't see the problem from a quality of care point of view.





farmerEd is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:30 PM   #22
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
haha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

My FIL and MIL have TriCare and coujld and have gone elsewhere, but for the most pat they go to Walter Reed. W.R. must be doing something right- FIL is 93!

Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
haha is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:44 PM   #23
Full time employment: Posting here.
perinova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 528
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

To me Universal Health care just means everyone covered. so: YES.

Nothing to do with quality of care. This question is a health insurance issue.
perinova is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:47 PM   #24
Recycles dryer sheets
tomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 251
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

A: Yes
B: As Martha says, Walter Reed is an army hospital, not a VA hospital. The VA hospital system is highly respected by medical professionals. The article in G below mentions this.
C: 51% of our healthcare expenditure of $1.7 trillion (as of 2003) was taxpayer money, but is not spent in a rational manner.
D. 45+ million people in this country have no health insurance. We ration, but it is economic rationing not anything rational.
E. We spend way more per capita than any other industrial nation on healthcare.
F. GM spends roughly $1400 per car on healthcare. Their profit per car is $178. Toyota's profit per car is $1742. Japan has national health insurance.
G. There is a difference between national health insurance and socialized medicine. England has socialized medicine. Germany, France, Holland and lots of others have national health insurance. Read The Health of Nations by Ezra Klein for an overview of health insurance in other countries.
H. 20% of the patients consume 80% of the dollars spent.
I. I think the Postal service does a pretty good job.

Read Money Driven Medicine by Maggie Mahar, which is the source for most of these facts.
tomz is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:50 PM   #25
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 140
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Is the Mass. health care program considered a "mandatory private health care" system? Does that mean you pick your health care program like you would choose a car insurance company?

I was fortunate because the doctor I chose accepted my insurance but didn't accept many other plans. Therefore, (for example) under a mandatory private program, then, I could chose what I currently have.

janeeyre is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:52 PM   #26
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 718
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Not if its done like Europe or Canada.
Mwsinron is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:59 PM   #27
Full time employment: Posting here.
perinova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 528
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwsinron
Not if its done like Europe or Canada.
I guess that would me No.
perinova is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 06:59 PM   #28
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 140
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

I have heard horror stories about VA hospitals since I was a kid.



I'm sure like anything else there are quality ones and then....

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...cidal-vet.html

I guess any dramatic story can mask reality.
janeeyre is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 07:40 PM   #29
Recycles dryer sheets
VoyT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 445
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by janeeyre
I don't want governmental policies to dictate my options.
As opposed to having an insurer's polices dictate your options?
__________________
"Coffee: the finest organic suspension ever devised." -- Kathryn Janeway
VoyT is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 08:11 PM   #30
Moderator Emeritus
Rich_by_the_Bay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 8,827
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Saw a patient today who seriously needed daily injections of a powerful blood thinner to prevent potentially fatal pulmonary blood clots. For various reasons, she was not a candidate for the usual pill form of blood thinner (warfarin or 'coumadin').

This will be a 6 month course, possibly lifelong. The injections cost around $70 per day. Insurance covers 15 days. They can't afford it on their own, period.

We are now faced with putting her on warfarin against medical recommendations, having her simply not accept treatment (50% mortality risk), or having them go $12,000 in debt every 5-6 months at a minimum through a home equity loan they can ill afford. She wants the pills and I am torn since I know it will expose her to serious excess risk.

I face these daily. It is very painful and often futile to fix. Regardless of its ultimate structure, a system which covers legitimate, evidence-based treatment within reasonable boundaries is morally necessary.

This is a 55 year old woman, worked and paid for health insurance (plus employer payments) for decades, and basically played by the rules. She's screwed.

The system needs to protect such people. A safety net at $10K or obliging insurers to pay for the legitimate and accepted medical duration of treatment, whatever. This is what it has come to, and your turn may well arise.

Personally, I favor a tax-supported, Medicare-like system covering all Americans with catastrophic coverage over $10K adjusted for inflation, and private or out-of-pocket coverage for the first $10k/y per person, perhaps adjusted for means.

The winners in the current scenario: pharma, insurers. Everyone else loses.
__________________
Rich
San Francisco Area
ESR'd March 2010. FIRE'd January 2011.

As if you didn't know..If the above message contains medical content, it's NOT intended as advice, and may not be accurate, applicable or sufficient. Don't rely on it for any purpose. Consult your own doctor for all medical advice.
Rich_by_the_Bay is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 08:17 PM   #31
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa
Posts: 3,588
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by janeeyre
. . . I do not believe I would have the same opportunities under a Universal Plan. . .
If your concern is about having opportunities, then why not simply keep your eye on the various proposals and make sure you only back those that preserve those opportunities? I don't see anything fundamental to the concept of Universal Health Care that requires elimination of options.
sgeeeee is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 08:56 PM   #32
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

I don't know what the answer is, but the current system of getting insurance through your employer is a broken one.

As far as I am from the socialist side of the scale, I would like to see some form of catastrophic coverage for all, and some basic preventative coverage for all at minimal rates. Catastrophic coverage just seems like the right thing to do, preventative/proactive care might actually provide a cost savings overall. Maybe tie in an incentive - take steps to stay healthy and premiums are lower?

I think people may be confusing having 'options' with having competition. I think it could be possible to have a system where the govt is administering, but people have a choice of which doctor to see.

I'm skeptical though.

-ERD50



ERD50 is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-02-2007, 10:57 PM   #33
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 145
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

I think there are a lot of good ideas for solving the healthcare crisis. I think that we probably need to adopt some combination of several. Here are some I've seen that I think have some merit:

1) Simplify. The medical community complains that a typical doctor spends some 40% of his or her time and resources just filling out all the paperwork for insurance companies, Medicare/Medicaid, etc. Let's get to work and come up with one uniform, simple set of forms that can be used for all purposes.

Ditto the FDA. It currently costs $900 million to get the average drug past all the FDA's requirements and on the shelves - even if the drug has already been approved in other countries and even if it's been used for ages overseas. Obviously, the bureaucratic bloat goes a long way to explain why drugs here are so much more expensive.

2) Healthy choices: Safeway says they dropped their health insurance rates by 15% simply by offering lower premiums to employees who enrolled in programs that helped them make healthy lifestyle changes, e.g. keeping up with preventative care and screenings, quitting smoking, losing weight, etc.

3) Cafeteria insurance. It used to be that insurance was only for catastrophic care. People expected to pay out of pocket for routine care, seeing the doctor for annual physicals, etc. Obviously, even routine care is more costly today, since we're advised to have regular screenings that cost good money. But most insurance plans today cover just everything - including things that most patients will never use, like acupuncture, chiropractic, etc. Maybe we should offer a basic plan for routine care and catastrophic coverage, then allow people to opt in for supplements that cover all the various options they personally would use.

4) Universal catastrophic and preventative coverage for those who can't afford insurance. Just the basics.

5) Malpractice reform. Doctors and hospitals make mistakes, and sometimes the mistakes hurt people. It's one thing to require that they pay to make the person whole (or as whole as possible). It's another to require them to make the patient a millionaire. We need to decide just how deep our doctors' pockets have to be, so that they can stop paying so much for malpractice insurance.
LKH is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 05:12 AM   #34
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,317
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

We need some sort of universal coverage. I would prefer single payer but expect I will have to settle for something inferior that retains the existing bureaucracy of insurers. What we have today is a travesty.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 05:50 AM   #35
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
teejayevans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by LKH
I think there are a lot of good ideas for solving the healthcare crisis. I think that we probably need to adopt some combination of several. Here are some I've seen that I think have some merit:

1) Simplify. The medical community complains that a typical doctor spends some 40% of his or her time and resources just filling out all the paperwork for insurance companies,
Ditto the FDA.

2) Healthy choices: Safeway says they dropped their health insurance rates by 15% simply by offering lower premiums to employees who enrolled in programs that helped them make healthy lifestyle changes, e.g. keeping up with preventative care and screenings, quitting smoking, losing weight, etc.

3) Cafeteria insurance. Maybe we should offer a basic plan for routine care and catastrophic coverage, then allow people to opt in for supplements that cover all the various options they personally would use.

4) Universal catastrophic and preventative coverage for those who can't afford insurance. Just the basics.

5) Malpractice reform.
1. doctors don't do it, their assistants do it, I think that number if overblown in this age
of computers.
2. agreed, I think insurance should be based on your fitness level, I don't want
to pay for the smokers, drinkers, drug users, for people a 1/2lb cheeseburger with
bacon and mayo is health food.
3/4. how about routine care, and basic medical care that covers 99% of the population,
then allow people to opt for catastrophic insurance in case of transplants, AIDS, etc
Also everybody has a deductible of some sort, with the exception of preventive
treatments (exams, flu shots, etc).
5. Agreed, if drug gets FDA approval and there is no fraud, the drug companies are not
liable. Tort reform is badly needed, no question, but since most of the politicians are
lawyers....here is a scary thought: President John Edwards, yikes!
6. Remove all advertising of prescription drugs, I'm tired of seeing the "ask your doctor
if you need our-overpriced-drug today!"

TJ
teejayevans is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 06:29 AM   #36
Moderator Emeritus
Martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_in_Tampa

This will be a 6 month course, possibly lifelong. The injections cost around $70 per day. Insurance covers 15 days. They can't afford it on their own, period.
How many of us here know if our insurance policies would cover this? Shopping is impossible and "choice" is meaningless to this person. I brought up the changes in the VA in part because they are now doing things that can reduce cost and yet provide better care. So they follow up with the patients who have chronic problems to help them do what they need to do to address the problems. Because patients are with them for life, the VA has a vested interest in keeping them healthy. They also practice evidence based medicine that Rich often mentions. Right now we are doing a lot wrong and the reasons are in part systematic.

I favor a Medicare type system rather than a for profit insurance company based system.

__________________
.


No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA

Martha is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 07:25 AM   #37
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

So is MKLD dead? Hard to believe she would not chime in here at length by now...
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 07:26 AM   #38
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 145
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans
1. doctors don't do it, their assistants do it, I think that number if overblown in this age of computers.
One reason some doctors won't take Medicare patients si because the bureaucracy costs them more money than they make. And if they can shovel it off to assistants, great, but WE pay for those assistants. Simplify the paperwork, and it will cost less.

Quote:
3/4. how about routine care, and basic medical care that covers 99% of the population, then allow people to opt for catastrophic insurance in case of transplants, AIDS, etc Also everybody has a deductible of some sort, with the exception of preventive treatments (exams, flu shots, etc).
There was a time when insurance was simply catastrophic care. What you want is coverage for the occasions when healthcare gets too expensive to afford. You need insurance to assure you that if you get cancer or something, you won't be bankrupted trying to get healthy again. So I wouldn't agree to an "opt-in" for catastrophic care. I think CC should be universal, as should preventative care. If you want to pay out of pocket for sick visits and other non-routine but typically less expensive care, then that makes sense. Same for mental health care, physical therapy, etc. (though I think there's a risk there. YOu don't opt in for physical therapy, and then you have an injury and they deny coverage when you try to opt in because it's a pre-existing condition).

Quote:
5. Agreed, if drug gets FDA approval and there is no fraud, the drug companies are not liable. Tort reform is badly needed, no question, but since most of the politicians are lawyers....here is a scary thought: President John Edwards, yikes!
Careful. You'll give me nightmares. Still, better than President Hillary. I think I could live with President Obama if I had to.

Actually, I'm not so sure about tort reform for drugs. If we cut out the FDA process, then the idea of crazy lawsuits would at least motivate pharmaceutical companies to make sure they test their product adequately. And unlike doctors, who usually have $100k student loans to pay off and other expenses that mean they don't net as much as you'd think, pharmaceutical companies DO have deep pockets. I'd be all for curtailing frivolous lawsuits, and also refusing suits where the patient was informed of a potential side effect and chose to assume the risk. But I wouldn't limit damages for drug companies when a drug caused harm and it can be shown that the company failed to adequately test it, or failed to make public some known side effects.

Quote:
6. Remove all advertising of prescription drugs, I'm tired of seeing the "ask your doctor if you need our-overpriced-drug today!"
Good point!
LKH is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 08:04 AM   #39
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 860
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich_in_Tampa
Saw a patient today who seriously needed daily injections of a powerful blood thinner to prevent potentially fatal pulmonary blood clots. For various reasons, she was not a candidate for the usual pill form of blood thinner (warfarin or 'coumadin').

This will be a 6 month course, possibly lifelong. The injections cost around $70 per day. Insurance covers 15 days. They can't afford it on their own, period.

We are now faced with putting her on warfarin against medical recommendations, having her simply not accept treatment (50% mortality risk), or having them go $12,000 in debt every 5-6 months at a minimum through a home equity loan they can ill afford. She wants the pills and I am torn since I know it will expose her to serious excess risk.

I face these daily. It is very painful and often futile to fix. Regardless of its ultimate structure, a system which covers legitimate, evidence-based treatment within reasonable boundaries is morally necessary.

This is a 55 year old woman, worked and paid for health insurance (plus employer payments) for decades, and basically played by the rules. She's screwed.
This is a very unfortunate situation. Having spent a lot of time appealing claims for clients, I would be willing to bet that this person's injection claims could be appealed and authorized, and perhaps even approved for the lifetime injections. A simple letter written by the doctor and sent into the insurance carrier through THE PROPER CHANNELS, would be the way to begin the appeal process....(I would not try to call customer service in a case like this other than to ask for the proper address for filing a FORMAL appeal.) If the person has a broker that can assist her, that would be even better, because a lot of times, brokers have contacts that can walk these things through the process in a quicker fashion. This just happens to be a unique situation that can't always be defined in a contract. Also, to move the claim through appeals in a timely manner, it is extremely important that the MEMBER, write a cover note, requesting the appeal based on her doctor's synopsis as attached. If the request is not signed by the member, it will be ignored, due to PRIVACY regulations.

A lot of times, insurance carriers put limits on things like blood thinners and other potentially dangerous drugs such as narcotics, to protect people from potential danger. A formal appeal in this situation and others like it is well worth it, and you, as her doctor could be of great assistance by providing a well-written letter explaining the situation in detail for her to use in the appeal process.

mykidslovedogs is offline  
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????
Old 05-03-2007, 09:13 AM   #40
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
teejayevans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
Re: Is Univeral Health Care the answer?????

Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans
. Tort reform is badly needed, no question
Speaking of tort reform being needed: Washington DC JUDGE is suing a
dry cleaners for losing his pants, for ....drum roll please...
$65,000,000.
It goes to trial next month, in my world he would be in order:
1. disbarred
2. pay all fees of the cleaners plus $650,000 (my 1% rule)
3. be prevented from being a party of any lawsuit for rest of his life.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...502763_pf.html
TJ
teejayevans is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll: How do you cover health care expenses in ER? chinaco Life after FIRE 48 04-24-2007 09:45 AM
Health Care provided after retirment runnerr FIRE and Money 9 09-05-2006 03:57 PM
Health Care Costs BigMike Life after FIRE 39 05-21-2006 02:37 PM
Vanguard Health Care distibution LOL! FIRE and Money 2 03-11-2006 06:01 PM
Health Care Lovecraft Young Dreamers 3 02-20-2004 08:28 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.