FinallyRetired
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2002
- Messages
- 1,322
I'm not sure how many vets are on this forum, but I wonder what experiences or opinions we have of the quality of the military health care system? There's been some front page stories recently about the problems at Walter Reed, and periodically there are negative stories about VA hospitals. But, as with most press stories, that's what sells newspapers, and the truth is somewhere in the middile.
My own experiences include 20+ years of only using military health facilities for myself and family, and 20 some years of using mixed civilian and military facilities. I've had one surgery at a VA hospital, one at a military hospital, and one at a civilian hospital. We've also had three deliveries and a number of other procedures in the military system. I've not been treated for anything serious yet (knock on wood), but have had the usual run of tests, diagnoses, referrals, etc. As I get older my needs and interest in quality of care increases.
Based on my personal and limited experience, I've seen no difference in quality or results between military and civilian hospitals. I think military hospitals and doctors are quicker to run advanced tests and offer more procedures, since insurance and costs are not a major driver. On the other hand, the civilian doctors I've seen tend to be more focused, get the problem fixed and move on to the next patient, but are also more experienced in the specific problem. One advantage of the civilian system is that the patient can choose a doctor (except for some insurance plans) and research the background and experience of specific doctors. In the military system, you pretty much get the doctor you're assigned to, there may only be one specialist, and there is little to go on for background.
The civilian facilities themselves also tend to be more up to date and cleaner, though the equipment seems about the same. The VA hospital was the worst as far as cleanliness. Air Force hospitals are the cleanest, and I dare say that applies to Air Force facilities as a whole as compared with sister services (not that I'm prejudiced).
There are obvious problems with specific portions of the military health system, as in the stories of continuing care at Walter Reed for those returning from Iraq. Having been treated at WR, I see this as a problem, but not one of medical quality, it's a problem of not having money or facilities to house those soldiers for extended periods. Not an excuse, it's consistent with the lack of post- Saddam planning by DoD.
The above is just my limited experience, and I wonder if there are others with similar or contradictory experience.
My own experiences include 20+ years of only using military health facilities for myself and family, and 20 some years of using mixed civilian and military facilities. I've had one surgery at a VA hospital, one at a military hospital, and one at a civilian hospital. We've also had three deliveries and a number of other procedures in the military system. I've not been treated for anything serious yet (knock on wood), but have had the usual run of tests, diagnoses, referrals, etc. As I get older my needs and interest in quality of care increases.
Based on my personal and limited experience, I've seen no difference in quality or results between military and civilian hospitals. I think military hospitals and doctors are quicker to run advanced tests and offer more procedures, since insurance and costs are not a major driver. On the other hand, the civilian doctors I've seen tend to be more focused, get the problem fixed and move on to the next patient, but are also more experienced in the specific problem. One advantage of the civilian system is that the patient can choose a doctor (except for some insurance plans) and research the background and experience of specific doctors. In the military system, you pretty much get the doctor you're assigned to, there may only be one specialist, and there is little to go on for background.
The civilian facilities themselves also tend to be more up to date and cleaner, though the equipment seems about the same. The VA hospital was the worst as far as cleanliness. Air Force hospitals are the cleanest, and I dare say that applies to Air Force facilities as a whole as compared with sister services (not that I'm prejudiced).
There are obvious problems with specific portions of the military health system, as in the stories of continuing care at Walter Reed for those returning from Iraq. Having been treated at WR, I see this as a problem, but not one of medical quality, it's a problem of not having money or facilities to house those soldiers for extended periods. Not an excuse, it's consistent with the lack of post- Saddam planning by DoD.
The above is just my limited experience, and I wonder if there are others with similar or contradictory experience.