RetiredAndFree
Recycles dryer sheets
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 281
You are right, and it's how the source of the calories affects how the calories are processed that is often the problem.
Let me give an example I heard from a professor of medicine who has done research into obesity. Mr Jones requires 2000 calories a day to be energy balanced. He eats 800 of those calories as sugar and other foods that greatly stimulate his insulin production. As a result of the insulin surge, his body stores 150 of the calories as fat very quickly. So now he only has 1850 calories to burn when he needs 2000. So he eats more to make up the difference. Sure, he could wait for his body to convert the those 150 recent fat calories to fuel, but he gets very hungry before that happens, so he eats instead. If he ate foods that did not trigger excess insulin Mr. Jones would not feel the need to eat the extra 150 calories.
There are, of course, other factors. Some foods do not trigger the chemicals that tell our brain we are satiated, so we eat more.
And, yes, this is very over simplified for the layperson.
Yes, yes, yes, I agree on all points.
I just get testy when I hear comments that imply weight is not a byproduct of the way in which we choose to balance the calories we take in vs the calories we put out. Because, of course, it is.
And as I said in my initial post here, I likewise moderate my non-complex (i.e., simple) carb intake because of the subsequent blood sugar spike/crash cycle.