|
|
01-03-2018, 08:02 AM
|
#181
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTFan
And that solid majority is getting heavily-subsidized, employer-provided insurance which buries the real cost of care. So why do they want change?
Good summation of the problems and fixes btw.
|
What's just as bad is how the subsidies in the employer-based health care work. There are two of them (maybe more). The first is the subsidy based on family type and size. Those employees who are single subsidize those who are married because the employer subsidy is worth more for the latter than for the former. Those employees who have no kids subsidize those who have kids in the same way. So, if you are single AND childfree, you get hurt both ways.
The next way is that the employer subsidy rewards those more who have higher incomes at the expense of those with lower incomes because the tax benefit is greater. Similarly, the employee share of their premiums is paid using pretax dollars, so employees with higher incomes benefit more.
The way to undo these inequities is to (a) tax the employer subsidy as ordinary wage income, and (b) allow those in individual plans to deduct their premiums even if they don't itemize, like with tIRA deductions. I'm not holding my breath on either one of these happening any time soon.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.
"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
01-03-2018, 08:05 AM
|
#182
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptTom
I question the use of the word "heavily."
Every MegaCorp I know has been on a years-long program of reducing the percentage of the health insurance that they pay. The end goal is to pay nothing, but simply offer some sort of group-purchasing power (if anything) to their employees.
The companies I know are approaching that goal at a pretty good clip. Many would see this as a good thing. When everyone pays their own way, maybe there will be some motivation (and political pressure) to do something about the costs.
The whole idea of putting the responsibility for health care on employers seems out of whack.
|
+ 10000 we had group BCBS for our small business for over 25 years..Finally couldn't afford to pay for it and switched over to an ACA policy from a company that I consider to be inferior in all ways to BCBS...we're a family owned C corp and can control our personal income so it hits ACA subsidy level.
Our insurance agent who is a relative, lost her commission and the multi-city agency she works for has started charging them more and more for her share of HI..They said they just can't afford the expense any more. Even the selling agencies are finding the cost too high.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:08 AM
|
#183
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrabbler1
What's just as bad is how the subsidies in the employer-based health care work. There are two of them (maybe more). The first is the subsidy based on family type and size. Those employees who are single subsidize those who are married because the employer subsidy is worth more for the latter than for the former. Those employees who have no kids subsidize those who have kids in the same way. So, if you are single AND childfree, you get hurt both ways.
The next way is that the employer subsidy rewards those more who have higher incomes at the expense of those with lower incomes because the tax benefit is greater. Similarly, the employee share of their premiums is paid using pretax dollars, so employees with higher incomes benefit more.
The way to undo these inequities is to (a) tax the employer subsidy as ordinary wage income, and (b) allow those in individual plans to deduct their premiums even if they don't itemize, like with tIRA deductions. I'm not holding my breath on either one of these happening any time soon.
|
You have this backwards, the more you earn the less the subsidy from the company is, they figure you have more money to give the insurance company. You are correct on the pre/ post tax..
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:16 AM
|
#184
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,698
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan
You have this backwards, the more you earn the less the subsidy from the company is, they figure you have more money to give the insurance company. You are correct on the pre/ post tax..
|
Backwards? Not at my old company. They paid 75% of our HI premiums for full-time employees and it didn't matter what your income was or what our family size/status was. For single/childfree employees (like me), I'd get a $3k or $4k subsidy. Married/childed employees would get at least twice that, regardless of salary.
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.
"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:17 AM
|
#185
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,974
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeachOrCity
-- Tort controls
|
This often comes up, and I think it's an issue that has largely been dealt with on the state level. Thirty-three states have imposed caps on damage awards for medical malpractice, including most of the biggest ones.
In my state, the "pain and suffering" cap was $750,000. That limit was recently set aside in the case of a woman who lost all four of her limbs because doctors let a strep infection go untreated. The jury awarded her $25 million. Was that excessive? She's going to need round-the-clock care for the rest of her life, and as we know, that kind of care is expensive.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:19 AM
|
#186
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrabbler1
Backwards? Not at my old company. They paid 75% of our HI premiums for full-time employees and it didn't matter what your income was or what our family size/status was. For single/childfree employees (like me), I'd get a $3k or $4k subsidy. Married/childed employees would get at least twice that, regardless of salary.
|
It's the new reality, my SIL works for WF....its been that way for at least 5 years..
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:20 AM
|
#187
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,192
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan
You have this backward, the more you earn the less the subsidy from the company is, they figure you have more money to give the insurance company. You are correct on the pre/ post tax..
|
I don't think one has anything to do with the other. How much a company pays is based on industry competition and company policy. HR sees the "competition" lower it to 60% premium co-pay that's what you're going to get. Our industry benefited from some foreign buy-outs which paid 90%, so all of a "sudden" our company was like, we love you guys and want to do the very best as the costs are so expensive we will up our contributions... which is the exact opposite comment they made the year before. Its a game of HR balancing out pay and benefits to get the optimum employees.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:43 AM
|
#188
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by karen1972
I don't think one has anything to do with the other. How much a company pays is based on industry competition and company policy. HR sees the "competition" lower it to 60% premium co-pay that's what you're going to get. Our industry benefited from some foreign buy-outs which paid 90%, so all of a "sudden" our company was like, we love you guys and want to do the very best as the costs are so expensive we will up our contributions... which is the exact opposite comment they made the year before. Its a game of HR balancing out pay and benefits to get the optimum employees.
|
You would know more about the motives then I would....but in this case higher earning employees get less subsidy money period...
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:46 AM
|
#189
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: https://www.google.com
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut
IMHO, we are all fussing over insurance costs, when we should be questioning the cost of medical care itself and why it is so much higher here than in other countries with similar lifespans.
|
+1 Absolutely correct
Read:
Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us
How outrageous pricing and egregious profits are destroying our health care
Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us - TIME
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:10 AM
|
#190
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Greenville
Posts: 653
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrabbler1
Backwards? Not at my old company. They paid 75% of our HI premiums for full-time employees and it didn't matter what your income was or what our family size/status was. For single/childfree employees (like me), I'd get a $3k or $4k subsidy. Married/childed employees would get at least twice that, regardless of salary.
|
Not sure how long you have been RE, but the past 15 years (2 companies) that I have worked for is exactly opposite of what you are talking about.
Also, a LOT of companies are self insured, and pay for administration of the HC program. I love how some lambast that employees have company sponsored HC, but work as hard as possible to game the ACA system.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:11 AM
|
#191
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivinsfan
No... people will just stop training to be doctors if the pay is not acceptable...doctors are smart people, they can do many things besides train to practice medicine. Careful what you wish for, all the good doctors will move on to other things and quantity doesn't equal quality.
|
Some will, many people will still go into the profession. Especially if the training was free, and we could offer living in the USA as a bonus. Medical professionals will still be paid more than most people, just not as much as now. I suppose the US could even draft doctors, and pay them the equivalent in military wages if we really needed them.
Outsourcing and H1Bs worked to worked to lower IT wages, and we still have plenty of IT workers.
I work with a lot of smart people. Whether a person is in medical school for 8 years, or working as a plumber for 8 years is no difference. It's still 8 years. Pilots put in a lot more time training, have a greater responsibility, and get paid a lot less.
Giving up the salary for 8 years is the major sacrifice, not the 8 years. Paying people while they are in medical school would solve that. A salary of $30K while in school, and a guaranteed $75K once you got out would still bring in many people to be a doctor. Once you remove the malpractice issue, it's easily do-able.
There is nothing special about doctors, any more than IT people, teachers, pilots, bankers, or even mechanics. All categories of people are smart enough to be Doctors. There are even people that went into business for themselves that would/could have been a doctor, but decided against it because of the limited availability of medical school.
Open up medical school to many more people, forgive student loans to those that commit to working for the government or government pricing, and providing disincentives to doctors that do not want to work with the payment plans.
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:14 AM
|
#192
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida's First Coast
Posts: 7,723
|
I disagree with some of these comments. It IS an insurance problem, or at least a funding problem. Non profit, large client base.... Medicare, VA, Medicaid and the Individual market WILL control costs, or at least what the providers will charge the Single Payer.
Employers will still get gouged as usual.
__________________
"Never Argue With a Fool, Onlookers May Not Be Able To Tell the Difference." - Mark Twain
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:19 AM
|
#193
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,266
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teacher Terry
I know someone with ACA insurance that needs a dangerous surgery that no one in their state can perform. It is a situation of life/death to not have the surgery. The ACA will not pay a dime for this out of network. That's how people go bankrupt.
|
Interesting and sad. I thought this was the kind of thing ACA was supposed to put an end to.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy
The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:41 AM
|
#194
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Champaign
Posts: 4,729
|
I feel fortunate my ACA offered plans that were POS (point of service) so if we go out of state or to out of network doctors they cover 50%. We have a high deductible with HSA. I'm kind of scared to go to Florida this month, but my HI said go to ER if you have any issues. They are really nice at customer service. ER is covered no matter where you go in U.S.
ShokWaveRider, I agree with you. We are a wealthy country. Canada and Europe, Japan and other places are not as wealthy and give citizens the right to healthcare.
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:47 AM
|
#195
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Champaign
Posts: 4,729
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot2013
Not sure how long you have been RE, but the past 15 years (2 companies) that I have worked for is exactly opposite of what you are talking about.
Also, a LOT of companies are self insured, and pay for administration of the HC program. I love how some lambast that employees have company sponsored HC, but work as hard as possible to game the ACA system.
|
Are you talking about Megacorp? Of course they are self insured. Not all companies can afford to do that. Really? One heart attack would put many smaller companies out of business.
Sorry, the super wealthy game the system in so many ways, I cannot even begin to talk about it. Research the true gamers, they have advisors and CPA's that would knock our socks off.
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:52 AM
|
#196
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator
Some will, many people will still go into the profession. Especially if the training was free, and we could offer living in the USA as a bonus. Medical professionals will still be paid more than most people, just not as much as now. I suppose the US could even draft doctors, and pay them the equivalent in military wages if we really needed them.
Outsourcing and H1Bs worked to worked to lower IT wages, and we still have plenty of IT workers.
I work with a lot of smart people. Whether a person is in medical school for 8 years, or working as a plumber for 8 years is no difference. It's still 8 years. Pilots put in a lot more time training, have a greater responsibility, and get paid a lot less.
Giving up the salary for 8 years is the major sacrifice, not the 8 years. Paying people while they are in medical school would solve that. A salary of $30K while in school, and a guaranteed $75K once you got out would still bring in many people to be a doctor. Once you remove the malpractice issue, it's easily do-able.
There is nothing special about doctors, any more than IT people, teachers, pilots, bankers, or even mechanics. All categories of people are smart enough to be Doctors. There are even people that went into business for themselves that would/could have been a doctor, but decided against it because of the limited availability of medical school.
Open up medical school to many more people, forgive student loans to those that commit to working for the government or government pricing, and providing disincentives to doctors that do not want to work with the payment plans.
|
I can see you have put a lot of thought into some of these ideas,so have you ever seen in the print the actual % of medical spending that goes to doctors?
And this would be a seismic shift in medical care, in fact if a DR makes 75K, what do your propose an RN would make? How about all the lab techs and other medical professionals?
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:55 AM
|
#197
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Williston, FL
Posts: 3,925
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rianne
ShokWaveRider, I agree with you. We are a wealthy country. Canada and Europe, Japan and other places are not as wealthy and give citizens the right to healthcare.
|
I would be curious to what level the healthcare salaries are in those countries compared to the USA.
Do Doctors get paid just as much in Canada as the USA?
__________________
FIRE no later than 7/5/2016 at 56 (done), securing '16 401K match (done), getting '15 401K match (done), LTI Bonus (done), Perf bonus (done), maxing out 401K (done), picking up 1,000 hours to get another year of pension (done), July 1st benefits (vacation day, healthcare) (done), July 4th holiday. 0 days left. (done) OFFICIALLY RETIRED 7/5/2016!!
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 10:00 AM
|
#198
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Champaign
Posts: 4,729
|
My knowledge of Italy, they do not. But Drs. and veterinarians go into those fields for different reasons. My niece is a veterinarian in Italy. Her passion for animals is incredible. I think she would do it for free. They make a nice salary but don't do it to become rich. How much do you need to be happy or comfortable?
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
Ralph Waldo Emerson
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 10:21 AM
|
#200
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida's First Coast
Posts: 7,723
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meadbh
|
However the services they provide are just as good.
__________________
"Never Argue With a Fool, Onlookers May Not Be Able To Tell the Difference." - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|