Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-16-2013, 05:53 AM   #81
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
JoeWras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 11,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxfirev5 View Post
While my Megacorp dropping retiree coverage has always been in the back of my mind, the 400% caught me off guard. I'm one of those people who put every available dollar into 401k's, 403b's and any other deferred account available. Now I find that I'll get hit pretty hard if megacorp drops their plan and I need ACA coverage. I don't plan to live on $60k a year after saving my entire worklife. However, I'm struggling with the taxable savings cash flow to make it work. Just when you figure it out they change the rules.
+1

I hear you. Thanks to this discussion, I've finally understood the 400% cliff you all have talked about. I'll be on that border when I ER too. My official plan is ER in 5 years and I hope they've made it a slider instead of a cliff by then. However, if Megacorp offers a buyout, then my ER moves up and I'll be worrying about this.

So many moving parts, so many things to consider...
JoeWras is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-16-2013, 11:44 AM   #82
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Live And Learn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Posts: 1,866
Quote:
Originally Posted by M Paquette View Post
Covered California, the PPACA health exchange for California, has rolled out it's benefit plans and related information.
<snip>
They put together a crude cost estimator, which will give a quote for a "Silver Plan" policy. A typical high deductible policy such as many of us use is more like a "Bronze Plan" policy. Costs look comparable to current Preferred Provider plans from Aetna, Blue Cross, etc for California residents. That is, ouch... But we're used to it. (They probably just loaded in the current prices of plans similar to the Silver Plan benefits.)

Health Insurance Calculator | Covered California
actually a little more than the Berkeley site estimated 1723/month vs 1592/month cost.
__________________
"For the time being no discipline brings joy, but seems grievous and painful; but afterwards it yields a peaceable fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it." ~
Hebrews 12:11

ER'd in June 2015 at age 52. Initial WR 3%. 50/40/10 (Equity/Bond/Short Term) AA.
Live And Learn is offline  
Old 02-16-2013, 10:07 PM   #83
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by obgyn65 View Post
I made a point. You made a point. We disagree on this topic. I just don't want to waste my time arguing with you on this topic, ERD50, and run the risk of getting this thread shut down.

Just remember one thing : while you spend time posting in these forums from the comfort of your home, I am the one who takes care of these patients' cancer and other conditions at free clinics. Until you do that, please don't be so judgmental and self righteous about 'responsible' vs 'non responsible' patients.
IMHO- With all due respect you ARE getting political, and you are not the only one caring for such patients. I know many who work urban charity hospitals & clinics who genuinely fear ACA will be net negative for US health care, inc eventually DEcreased access to care for un/under insured. For example, sharp reductions (up to 75%) in federal Disproportionate Share (DSH) payments to hospitals serving indigent/poor/underinsured patients may severely hurt these urban "safety net" facilities & their ability to continue operating at current levels of service.
http://www.nauh.org/component/option...,115/view,doc/
And CBO estimates for the number of people remaining uninsured under ACA continue to rise by the millions with each successive updated analysis.
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...0Estimates.pdf
http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/fil...eEstimates.pdf

I'm sure we all hope for the best, but no one knows just how this will all play out. Many critical rules & regs for actual implementation have yet to finalized, and the overall effect of ACA on the US economy (inc unemployment) continues to be hotly debated. Only time will tell.
ERhoosier is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 06:53 AM   #84
Recycles dryer sheets
WestLake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 239
M thanks for the California calculator. I'm getting $635 per month for a single between 55-60. Under the 'cliff' a $279 subsidy, 0 over.

Will probably be over the cliff unless I can come up with some neat tricks.

Not hugely 'affordable' for those with mortgages and/or high COL areas but for me, OK and a relief.
WestLake is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 07:10 AM   #85
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,842
Is the income used for calculations current year income or prior year income or some average?
__________________
But then what do I really know?

https://www.early-retirement.org/forums/f44/why-i-believe-we-are-about-to-embark-on-a-historic-bull-market-run-101268.html
Running_Man is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 07:13 AM   #86
Administrator
MichaelB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Running_Man View Post
Is the income used for calculations current year income or prior year income or some average?
From the most recent 1040. For 1/1/2014, that means 2012 income.
MichaelB is online now  
Old 02-17-2013, 07:38 AM   #87
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB View Post
From the most recent 1040. For 1/1/2014, that means 2012 income.
Meaning people who FIRE and suddenly have a large drop in income will feel a lot of pain for a year. Looks like that may be a new budget item for FIRE: paying the "full freight" on a health plan with a much lower income for a year. If you go from $120K in 2013 to $50K in 2014, you would have to pay the full cost based on an assumed $120K salary in 2014 -- meaning you could be paying perhaps 30% of your income to health insurance in that first year.

Hence someone who thinks they can retire on $X may need to figure on needing $X+10000 in the first year.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 07:50 AM   #88
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,842
OK thank you Micael B! This means for 2 years of unsubsidized full freight healthcare expense to plan for then.
__________________
But then what do I really know?

https://www.early-retirement.org/forums/f44/why-i-believe-we-are-about-to-embark-on-a-historic-bull-market-run-101268.html
Running_Man is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 08:26 AM   #89
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 423
Does anyone have an idea how they are going to calculate "income" for the subsidy? Will you collect the subsidy in arrears based on previous year's tax filing? If so, if I retire in middle of year is there any way to change the tax year start and end date? Or, do I need to make sure to retire in December and ensure that I have enough money in Roth and taxable accounts to keep income under $60K (or whatever number for family of 2) until we go on Mediscare?

I will qualify for half employer paid medical at 58 (so my costs would be just $600 month for the two of us) but I have a strong suspicion that will be gone in the remaining 22 months before I turn 58. As we both have many pre-existing conditions and very expensive maintenance drugs medical is the real concern for RE.

thanks,

Marc

edited to add: Sorry, didn't see same question popup just before i started posting.
Marc is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 08:31 AM   #90
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc View Post
Does anyone have an idea how they are going to calculate "income" for the subsidy? Will you collect the subsidy in arrears based on previous year's tax filing? If so, if I retire in middle of year is there any way to change the tax year start and end date? Or, do I need to make sure to retire in December and ensure that I have enough money in Roth and taxable accounts to keep income under $60K (or whatever number for family of 2) until we go on Mediscare?
I think it's the most recent available AGI from a tax filing. I'm not sure about any ability to play games with the "tax year". For most folks, the first year of a major drop in income will cause a spike in expenses for the first year and perhaps the second year in retirement, because you are likely getting little or no subsidy for health insurance.

As far as engineering your income, if you look like you might only barely exceed 400% of the FPL, it might be worth doing but if you are fortunate enough to have retirement income that *easily* exceeds it, I wouldn't impoverish myself just to get any of the subsidy. In other words, manipulating "the cliff" to become eligible for subsidies might be worth it if you expect to have income of (say) 450% of FPL, but not if you had 800% of it.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 09:24 AM   #91
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
So if there's guarantee issue, why not go without insurance until you think you'd need it?

If the cost without subsidies are so high that the premiums exceed the penalty?
explanade is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 09:29 AM   #92
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Mulligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade
So if there's guarantee issue, why not go without insurance until you think you'd need it?

If the cost without subsidies are so high that the premiums exceed the penalty?
I know one fly in the ointment on that strategy is there is a yearly window signup period for those that pass. So you could possibly rack up a big cost in the hospital waiting for the window period to open up.
Mulligan is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 10:44 AM   #93
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Katsmeow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
Meaning people who FIRE and suddenly have a large drop in income will feel a lot of pain for a year. Looks like that may be a new budget item for FIRE: paying the "full freight" on a health plan with a much lower income for a year. If you go from $120K in 2013 to $50K in 2014, you would have to pay the full cost based on an assumed $120K salary in 2014 -- meaning you could be paying perhaps 30% of your income to health insurance in that first year.

Hence someone who thinks they can retire on $X may need to figure on needing $X+10000 in the first year.
If (and I realize it is a big if) then is done like the income based premiums on medicare then in the situation you give above they will give you relief.

When DH went on medicare in late 2012 they initially based premiums for part B and part D on our 2010 tax return. However, if your income was less in 2011 or 2012 for certain reasons such as him reducing his hours of work or me reducing mine or retiring then you could bring in proof and they would modify this. He brought in our 2011 tax return and got it modified somewhat.

What they don't modify for or one time large IRA withdrawals. For example in 2012 we had larger IRA withdrawals in connection with a house purchase. That will cause his medicare premiums to go up in 2014.
Katsmeow is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 10:58 AM   #94
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post

As far as engineering your income, if you look like you might only barely exceed 400% of the FPL, it might be worth doing but if you are fortunate enough to have retirement income that *easily* exceeds it, I wouldn't impoverish myself just to get any of the subsidy. In other words, manipulating "the cliff" to become eligible for subsidies might be worth it if you expect to have income of (say) 450% of FPL, but not if you had 800% of it.
Good point, but it still might be worth using some ($30K?) taxed money to save $10K a year until Medicare arrives. I could envision taking a $50K loan to save $10K for 2-3 years if you needed a few years. "Impoverishment" isn't the only angle, I think.

Regardless of how you get there, I find it interesting that there is a lot of talk on this site about 'engineering income'. It seems that now more than ever it has become better to appear low income than middle class.
__________________
Living well is the best revenge!
Retired @ 52 in 2005
marko is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 11:02 AM   #95
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
Looks like that may be a new budget item for FIRE: paying the "full freight" on a health plan with a much lower income for a year.
Your use of the word "new" in this situation is a bit confusing Zig. Before ACA, an early retiree without employer provided retiree health insurance would have budgeted for the full cost of a private plan until age 65. Now, with ACA, he/she budgets for the full cost of a private plan obtained through the exchange until a possible subsidy lowers that cost later, likely after the first full tax year of RE.

Are you saying "new" because even with a temporay unsubsidized premium, under ACA lower income early retirees will be able to obtain tax payer subsidized health coverage whereas before they would be paying the entire premium until Medicare?
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 11:09 AM   #96
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
Your use of the word "new" in this situation is a bit confusing Zig.....

Are you saying "new" because even with a temporay unsubsidized premium, under ACA lower income early retirees will be able to obtain tax payer subsidized health coverage whereas before they would be the entire premium until Medicare?
"New" as in different rules to learn and manipulate apply for your maximum personal benefit - not "new" as in "new costs that early retirees never faced before."
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 11:27 AM   #97
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
youbet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by ziggy29 View Post
"New" as in different rules to learn and manipulate apply for your maximum personal benefit - not "new" as in "new costs that early retirees never faced before."
Thanks Zig. Yeah, I understand your point now. Originally I was reading "new" to be a "new additional cost."
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
youbet is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 12:03 PM   #98
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by youbet View Post
Thanks Zig. Yeah, I understand your point now. Originally I was reading "new" to be a "new additional cost."
And, it will be an additional cost for those who do lose the insurance provided by their previous employers. That apparently not a trivial number of cases.
samclem is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 12:18 PM   #99
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by samclem View Post
And, it will be an additional cost for those who do lose the insurance provided by their previous employers. That apparently not a trivial number of cases.
+1. But in fairness to ACA, it appears this trend had started some years ago & some employers may be blaming ACA for what they intended to do anyway.

Budget Report: More Employers Than Previously Estimated Will Drop Health Coverage - Kaiser Health News
ERhoosier is offline  
Old 02-17-2013, 12:19 PM   #100
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERhoosier View Post
I'm sure we all hope for the best, but no one knows just how this will all play out.
While I completely agree that no one knows how it will all play out, I'm afraid that there are many in this country who do not hope for the best as far as the PPACA is concerned. (I want to emphasize that I am not referring to anyone in this forum.)
anethum is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.