Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Preventive cardiac care >65 years of age: statins?
Old 08-10-2016, 06:23 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,635
Preventive cardiac care >65 years of age: statins?

The speaker at our old guys' breakfast group today was an MD. He said that we all had 2 risk factors for heart disease/stroke (sex and age). This did not surprise me as I've heard that before. What did surprise me is that he said those risk factors are enough to have us all on daily low-dose aspirin AND a low-moderate dose of a statin regardless of our cholesterol numbers. I know there is a difference of opinion on the value of low-dose aspirin after a certain age. But the statin recommendation caught me off-guard. I did a bit of web research and found that this is indeed consistent with current guidelines. I have slightly elevated cholesterol but my docs have never suggested statins. I'm curious if any older guys with "normal" cholesterol have been prescribed statins.
__________________
friar1610
friar1610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 08-10-2016, 06:49 PM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 2,962
I was 41 with cholesterol of 225. One second of data for a lifetime of drugs. Life nearly destroyed by statins. Adverse reactions blithely ignored. Further destruction. Stopped unilaterally. Took 10 years to recover 80% the rest will never go away. One MD wanted to put a stent in my aorta. Kept telling me my statins symptoms (all clearly listed in the paperwork) were because my aorta was blocked. Went on Atkins diet. Cholesterol soared but I felt better than I had in years. Just turned 59. Still waiting to have that heart attack.

Had heart scanned a few yrs back. Minor plaque burden. Obviously put there back when I smoked ciggies 1980-1991. Nearly zero risk for strokes, carotids clear as baby's.

Doctors still bug me about cholesterol. I ask: So, what's my risk? they can never tell me. They actually tell me a fat guy who smokes and gets no exercise has lower risk if his cholesterol is low. So I ask, what's the fat guy's risk? He can't tell me. Rolls eyes like a child who's not getting his/her way.

Trade theoretical risk of a heart attack some day for a real risk of getting killed tomorrow. Like that's a good bet.
razztazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2016, 06:57 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 235
Research the dangers of statins with dr. Google. Then look up the benefit of diet for heart health. Fuhrman and Esselstyn come to mind. Dr. Fuhrman has a great book that came out this year - The End of Heart Disease. LOTS of great new info in it.
CountryGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2016, 07:29 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dawg52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central MS/Orange Beach, AL
Posts: 9,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountryGal View Post
Research the dangers of statins with dr. Google. .
Research the dangers of any drug and you will find plenty.

I've been on a low dose statin for 10 years or so. When my doc recommended one, my overall number was not horrible but my bad cholesterol was border line high. I tried a better diet for a few months, but the bad number actually went up a bit. After going on the drug all my numbers have been great. But there are always new reports coming out contradicting the benefits of certain drugs and health practices so who knows.............

I plan to stay with it until advised different by the doc.
__________________
Retired 3/31/2007@52
Investing style: Full time wuss.
Dawg52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 06:58 AM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
mpeirce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 3,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg52 View Post
Research the dangers of any drug and you will find plenty.
Definitely look at a variety of sources.

Talk it over with your doctor, but also educate yourself.

This book by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is worth reading:

The Great Cholesterol Con: The Truth About What Really Causes Heart Disease and How to Avoid It
mpeirce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 07:23 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,495
Good friend had similar experience to Razztazz except problems subsided after a year or so. Just in general, I'm a big skeptic of prescription drugs unless there's a specific symptom and lots of evidence that it will have a largely positive impact. I guess I figure anything that is advertised so much has an awful lot of profit motive that may not be in my best interest.

My bad cholesterol was getting high, doctor basically was "meh. may want to watch diet." I did (primarily cut back on meat) and it dropped 40 points in about six months. IIRC his lack of concern was because there's no history of problems in my family. Meanwhile I'm not paying that much attention to it. Exercise regularly, weight almost nudges overweight BMI, but I'm more about enjoying life.

Just remembered that back in my 40's I did the phoresis platelet donation about once a month. They'd send a postcard with total cholesterol afterwards. I could always just about predict what it was going to be based on how much I'd been running.
H2ODude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 07:46 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by razztazz View Post
I was 41 with cholesterol of 225. One second of data for a lifetime of drugs. Life nearly destroyed by statins. Adverse reactions blithely ignored. Further destruction. Stopped unilaterally. Took 10 years to recover 80% the rest will never go away. One MD wanted to put a stent in my aorta. Kept telling me my statins symptoms (all clearly listed in the paperwork) were because my aorta was blocked. Went on Atkins diet. Cholesterol soared but I felt better than I had in years. Just turned 59. Still waiting to have that heart attack.

Had heart scanned a few yrs back. Minor plaque burden. Obviously put there back when I smoked ciggies 1980-1991. Nearly zero risk for strokes, carotids clear as baby's.

Doctors still bug me about cholesterol. I ask: So, what's my risk? they can never tell me. They actually tell me a fat guy who smokes and gets no exercise has lower risk if his cholesterol is low. So I ask, what's the fat guy's risk? He can't tell me. Rolls eyes like a child who's not getting his/her way.

Trade theoretical risk of a heart attack some day for a real risk of getting killed tomorrow. Like that's a good bet.
This is what it all comes down to. I've never found a doctor who can give a meaningful risk assessment for heart disease, at least not until after a heart attack. I too had adverse reactions to statins that were poo-pooed by my doctor. After reading a fair amount of books and research on both sides of the argument, I haven't been able to find anything other than weak correlation but no causation regarding cholesterol and heart disease. So, personally I wouldn't (and don't) take them. But to each his own.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Take a look at psyllium husks
Old 08-11-2016, 08:17 AM   #8
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Victoria
Posts: 106
Take a look at psyllium husks

I was diagnosed with AFIB a little over a year ago. One of the appointments before surgery was a CAT scan of my chest. Although my Cholesterol was normal, they did find a minor build up of plaque in one of my arteries. The Cardiologist suggested statins. When I mentioned this to my GP, she suggested psyllium husks. Said they have been proven to lower cholesterol and remove plaque from arteries but don't get the advertising that statins do. I put it in my cereal in the mornings and in a snack at night. Seems to help and the only side affect is regularity in my morning constitutional.
justlikebike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:33 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
athena53's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,326
I was put on statins about 5 years ago and got bad tendonitis. Like, unable to lift a spoon to my mouth without searing pain, bad. Anti-inflammatories helped only a little. I was starting to feel similar pains around my knee joints. I realized that the onset of all this had been about 6 months before when I started statins, and after some research I threw them out. I am convinced I'd be an invalid by know if I'd been stupid enough to keep taking them. One great podcast I listened to noted that high cholesterol is an abnormal lab result and statins can reverse that. Period. That's not necessarily a reason to take them.


I still have to watch my triglycerides because I can go overboard on sugar, but I'm 63 and still doing sprint triathlons and 35-mile charity bike rides. My weight is the same as it was when I graduated from HS. I'll take my chances.
athena53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:39 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Amethyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,598
Since reading about it in this forum, I've been taking Cholestoff (plant sterols) for about 8 months. Possibly due to the Cholestoff (since my exercise and diet did not change) my total cholesterol dropped from 211 to 183. Unfortunately, my LDL hardly dropped at all, while my HDL went from 88 to 60 - the wrong direction! And my fasting blood sugar went from 88 to 94. So I don't know what to think. Maybe I can't have PBJ sandwiches any more.

With my family history, I'm more afraid of stroke than heart attack.

Amethyst

Quote:
Originally Posted by justlikebike View Post
I was diagnosed with AFIB a little over a year ago. One of the appointments before surgery was a CAT scan of my chest. Although my Cholesterol was normal, they did find a minor build up of plaque in one of my arteries. The Cardiologist suggested statins. When I mentioned this to my GP, she suggested psyllium husks. Said they have been proven to lower cholesterol and remove plaque from arteries but don't get the advertising that statins do. I put it in my cereal in the mornings and in a snack at night. Seems to help and the only side affect is regularity in my morning constitutional.
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
Amethyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:46 AM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
It's really not an issue of finding something besides statins to lower cholesterol. If you read and accept the theories put forth by people like Drs. Kendrick, Sinatra, Graveline, etc., they are saying cholesterol is not a problem for most people (btw, if you're looking for the problem, it's inflammation caused by sugar). So the question becomes do you need to lower your cholesterol or not. If you choose yes, and statins don't cause side effects, drive on. If you choose yes but have bad reactions to statins, I guess things like psyllium husks and fat control are the best option. But if you choose no, the question becomes moot. (Moot, not mute!). Sadly, for me at least, sugar control is much harder than popping a pill. But at least it doesn't cause muscle pain and weakness. I get that bad enough just from being 60.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 08:59 AM   #12
Moderator
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by justlikebike View Post
When I mentioned this to my GP, she suggested psyllium husks. Said they have been proven to lower cholesterol and remove plaque from arteries but don't get the advertising that statins do. I put it in my cereal in the mornings and in a snack at night. Seems to help and the only side affect is regularity in my morning constitutional.
Metamucil (I think they recently renamed it to just Meta) is essentially just psyllium husks mixed with maltodextrin, so your diet should definitely keep you regular. The effect on cholesterol is likely very small, though.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 09:38 AM   #13
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 235
After over 30 years of high Cholesterol (no statins), I was surprisingly able to drop it 70 points with a clean mostly plant based diet. I don't believe I have a statin deficiency and when they did further testing (at my insistence) my LDLs were actually the large kind (good) and not the small dense kind that cause issues.

For years I did Atkins and Paleo type diets, but was unable to drop the numbers. YMMV

If you do some research you will find a large percentage of folks with High Cholesterol have heart attacks, so the level is not the only data point we should look at. Look up the book "The Great Cholesterol Myth".
CountryGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:04 AM   #14
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Vienna
Posts: 58
The website thennt.com tackles both of your questions. The aspirin question is answered here and the statin question is answered here. Spoiler alert, the answer is any potential benefit is offset by the potential side effects. However, the answer changes if you have had a prior heart attack or have known heart disease.

BTW, I take both a statin and an aspirin daily. So far, I've not had any of the potential negative side effects from either the aspirin or the statin and my cholesterol has been lowered.
MildlyEccentric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:30 AM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,320
thennt.com site is quite good. Some would say on the conservative side but consistent with the 'first do no harm' approach. It is very well referenced and gives lots of extra 'high quality' resources for those looking to look further.
6miths is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:46 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountryGal View Post
Research the dangers of statins with dr. Google. Then look up the benefit of diet for heart health. Fuhrman and Esselstyn come to mind. Dr. Fuhrman has a great book that came out this year - The End of Heart Disease. LOTS of great new info in it.
+1
My cholesterol was average. Then I significantly elevated my good cholesterol while lowering bad cholesterol last year through diet alone. My primary care physician who is a cardiologist had previously recommended statins solely as a preventative measure. After reviewing my improved blood results trending over a period of time he withdrew his preventative statin recommendation.
Options is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 11:50 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Teacher Terry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7,002
I find it so ridiculous to recommend that everyone go on statins. I know a doc that recommends no one ever go on them. No proven benefits and lots of bad reactions.
Teacher Terry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 12:27 PM   #18
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,635
OP here. Some excellent responses and web sites to check out. A couple of people asked about a real risk assessment for cardiac problems. This web site was referenced in the doc's talk:

ACC/AHA ASCVD Risk Calculator

It's supposed to assess cardiovascular risk based on American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. I did the assessment using my actual data and it said I had a 10 year 23% risk for heart disease or stroke. (I am 71 now.) It also said there was insufficient evidence that starting a low-dose aspirin would help but recommended a moderate to high intensity statin.

I was a little bothered by the high percentage since I consider myself to be in pretty good shape for an old guy. I then played around with the variables that I can presumably control (like cholesterol) and found very small decreases (like from 23% to 21%) in my risk if I get my cholesterol down to ideal levels. So I concluded that at my age the benefit would be modest indeed if I were to start a statin AND if it were to have the desired effect. My biggest risk factors are apparently my sex and age which I can't do much about.

I also noted that the calculator didn't ask anything about physical/aerobic exercise (which I do a lot of) although I suppose that could indirectly be factored into the blood pressure number. Nor did it ask about weight/BMI.

I've had several primary care docs over the past 25 years and have always had cholesterol on the high side. Since none of them have recommended a statin I guess I should trust their collective judgment more than an on-line calculator or a speaker's breakfast talk.
__________________
friar1610
friar1610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 12:32 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
The problem with the calculator (as with all calculators) is the assumptions it makes. It assumes high cholesterol increases the risk of heart disease, although there is a lot of evidence it doesn't. It doesn't ask many meaningful questions at all. So I certainly wouldn't base a medication regime off of it.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2016, 12:48 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
Here's an interesting discussion on statins:

Show 1044: The Truth about Statins and Heart Disease - The People's Pharmacy

Quote:
We speak with two experts on statins and heart disease to get to the heart of the matter. They have different perspectives on the value of statins, but their views on what else we should be doing to protect our hearts are not as divergent as you might imagine.
IIRC, what the experts agreed on was a "Mediterranean diet" - more fish, legumes, veggies, fruits and less processed meat, smaller amounts of dairy'. And, of course, the other magic bullet - exercise.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cardiac CT Scan for Calcium tangomonster Health and Early Retirement 97 07-22-2016 08:25 AM
Preventive full body scan anyone? Lisa99 Health and Early Retirement 26 08-12-2014 08:46 PM
my father is in the cardiac care unit simple girl Other topics 7 05-15-2008 07:54 AM
preventive care Khan Health and Early Retirement 17 12-23-2006 07:46 PM
Who takes statins? Which ones? BUM Other topics 51 06-04-2005 11:58 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.