Dr Huo hopes to see her test available to physicians in 2-3 years. That would be good news.
Pilot studies found Huo’s technique is significantly more exact. The test determines with 90 to 95 percent confidence that the result is not false-positive. When it comes to false-negatives, there is 50 percent confidence – not ideal, but still significantly higher than the PSA’s 20 percent.
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
It's a poorly written/researched article or a con job. First it says it detects cancer not prostate cancer. Then goes on to imply this method detects only prostate cancer but could be used for other cancers. So, just what is it is does and why would it not lead to unnecessary biopsies?
For their information the PSA test does not detect cancer. It always has a 100% false detection rate. It only measures PSA not cancer. If anyone gets a needless biopsy from it they were conned into it. And PSA's never ever lead to unnecessary treatments as the article says. You don't treat PSA results. If you know how to use the PSA test this new test doesn't really add much because they won't now enough to diagnose or treat until they ..... wait for it.... do a biopsy. More muddy waters here.
This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.