Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question about ACA premium credit eligibility
Old 05-26-2017, 09:14 AM   #1
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 255
Question about ACA premium credit eligibility

My wife is considering taking a part time job next year, doing something which she enjoys but does not pay well. The job offers health insurance. For just herself, the premium would be $600 per month, though she gets a $665/month 'allowance' for insurance, so it would basically cost her nothing. For our entire family, the premium would be $1865/mo, minus the allowance, so a net of $1200 per month. I expect our AGI for the year to be under $70K.

If I understand the rules regarding the ACA premium tax credit correctly, if my wife takes this job, we would no longer be eligible for the tax credit? I believe the rule states that no credit/subsidy is allowed if insurance is available to the family (it is), and if the plan is "affordable" - meaning the cost of the employee's contribution, for the employee's coverage only, is less than 9.69% of AGI (or MAGI? Let's assume they're the same).

By my definition, this insurance is not affordable - it would cost us $14,400 per year, or 21% of our income. Even the normal price for my wife alone would be greater than 9.69% of AGI. But because my wife gets an 'allowance', making her cost effectively $0, it becomes by definition 'affordable', regardless of what it will actually cost my family? This seems like a rigged way of determining affordability - the insurance would ALWAYS be considered 'affordable', regardless of how little our income is or how high the cost of the family policy. Am I interpreting the law correctly?

At this point, it looks as though my wife will turn down this job, because after losing the subsidy and paying for this insurance the net pay for the job goes down to almost nothing. Law of unintended consequences at play here?
Curmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-26-2017, 09:24 AM   #2
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,622
I can't answer your question, but I can tell you what I'd do to get another data point...

Open your tax software (yes, it's designed to work for 2016 tax year, but let's pretend all the rules stay the same). Go through the Q&A answering questions as if your wife's W2 income in there and that you have access to health insurance. See what it says on the 8962.
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 10:48 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
What the OP outlined in the OP sounds right... albeit a bizarre result. Best thing would be to call your exchange or healthcare.gov and see if they can confirm or refute the interpretation.

Perhaps OP's DW can take on the role as a consultant rather than as an employee and avoid the issue.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 11:03 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,940
Are you comparing apples to apples on this insurance. The work insurance might have a bigger network and lower co-pays?

Another way to look at is, it will guarantee your family insurance at a set price and you wouldn't be subjected to changes,(and some changes are definitely coming) in the ACA program..
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 02:35 PM   #5
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curmudgeon View Post
Am I interpreting the law correctly?
Yes, this is known as the ACA "Family Glitch". The article below includes a background section on how this came to be but I will avoid quoting that section.

Quote:
The problem is that the definition of "affordable"--for both an individual employee and a family--is based only on the worker contribution of individual-only coverage and does not take into consideration the often significantly higher cost of a family plan.

Defining eligibility in this way ignores the cost of a family plan, which is frequently much more expensive than self-only coverage.

In 2013 the average worker contribution for self-only, employer-sponsored coverage was $999 annually, while the average contribution for family coverage was $4,565, although there is considerable variation in both single and family plans. Therefore, the employer-sponsored coverage would be considered affordable for a family of four with a household income of $33,000 (just over 140 percent of the federal poverty level), even though buying a plan for the entire family would cost 13.8 percent of their household income.

Full article: Health Policy Briefs
MBSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2017, 11:26 PM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
What the OP outlined in the OP sounds right... albeit a bizarre result. Best thing would be to call your exchange or healthcare.gov and see if they can confirm or refute the interpretation.
Might be better to check with a CPA.
brucethebroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACA Subsidy Eligibility Notice--how to prove income RunningBum Health and Early Retirement 48 12-21-2016 02:15 PM
MAGI for Obamacare premium tax credit question shiody FIRE and Money 3 02-08-2016 06:28 PM
Avoiding Medi-Cal eligibility for children under ACA? skyline Health and Early Retirement 3 10-13-2013 03:03 PM
Medicaid eligibility under ACA kevink Health and Early Retirement 6 05-04-2013 05:54 PM
Medicaid Eligibility in 2014 under ACA kevink Health and Early Retirement 3 01-21-2013 01:56 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.