Portal Forums Links Register FAQ Community Calendar Log in

Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Raising Medicare Age Eligbility?
Old 12-08-2012, 09:18 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,797
Raising Medicare Age Eligbility?

Concerning proposal for those considering ER-

Trade-offs in raising Medicare eligibility age - Yahoo! News

Surprised to read that tho Repubs seem to be main ones pushing idea now, polls suggest public views opposing this are similar across party lines. Personally I think the overall "savings" would be relatively small. Saving would NOT be directly related to decreasing # Medicare recipients. Older folks (67 vs 65) have higher ave care cost-per-person so gov't & individual premiums would have to rise to compensate. And if companies keep their common policy of only offering their HI until 65, there could be a big increase in expensive uninsured population (65-66ers). Many of these folks might then end up on gov't-funded HI anyway (Medicaid).

I've long thought a novel solution to help overall Medicare finances might be to allow younger ER's/unemployed (COBRA'ed or post-COBRA) to buy in to Program at graduated premiums. This should lower cost-per-enrollee by bringing in some younger (prob healthier) folks who pay additional $$$ into the system until reaching current 65 eligibility. If this concept is being discussed by politicians I have not seen it.
ERhoosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 12-08-2012, 10:02 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,305
There's a little fuzzy math in the article, but maybe one day we'll have universal health care in some form and none of this will matter. With PPACA we've taken a small step in that direction, like it or not. Controlling health care costs in the aggregate is the ultimate issue, and we haven't really gotten to that yet - though we'll be forced to eventually.

I'll withhold my comments on the AARP...
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 10:43 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Katsmeow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,308
The idea of raising the age is one that on the surface seems appealing, but in practice is not that appealing. Yes, the government wouldn't have to provide care to those ages 65 and 66. However, it isn't those people that are causing Medicare to have financial problems. Relatively speaking those who are 65 and 66 and relatively healthy. Raising the Medicare eligibility age will decrease the government's cost (perhaps) but it will greatly increase the costs for individuals particularly those who are already retired.

Medicare retirement age: Raising Medicare eligibility age to 67 would cost patients twice as much as it would save the government—don’t do it. - Slate Magazine
Katsmeow is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.