Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-20-2016, 04:19 AM   #41
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,933
the problem is for those who have enough in assets to worry about this stuff odds are once ss kicks in tax free 100% will not be the case . you can see that from the poll they did here .

i know in our case just both our ss , a small 20k pension and the little bits of non qualified dividends and interest we get leave very little room left in the tax free 15% bracket . this will get worse once rmd's kick in .

distributions from our funds can range from 29k to 69k a year . so our real life scenario is we would have been better off reversing things .

to late now .

mathjak107 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-20-2016, 05:06 AM   #42
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Gone4Good's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,383
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
if you can get them tax free that trumps all . other wise fund dividends being taxable and fund turnover are key . even a 1% dividend over a typical accumulation period of 30-40 years will destroy tax savings .

owning index funds may not matter either as they too can have turnover .

kitces did an excellent article on the fact we may have been told wrong .
I'd have to spend a lot more time working through the math to see how this works but at first blush it just doesn't seem right.

Here are the initial assumptions . . .

The stocks are assumed to grow at a long-term return of 10%, and the bonds at 5%. The IRA is taxed (at 25% ordinary income rates) at the end upon liquidation, the stocks in the taxable account are also taxed at the end upon liquidation but at 15% long-term capital gains rates, and the bonds in the taxable account are simply taxed annually (also at 25% ordinary income rates).
So bonds return 5% and are taxed at 25%. Equity is assumed to be taxed at 15%. He then changes the scenario as follows . . .

For instance, if the long-term appreciation for equities is only 5% (which on top of a 2% dividend would lead to a total return of “just” 7%), there is still a benefit to holding equities inside an IRA in the long run, but not as much:
So he's claiming that paying 25% every year on 100% of your 5% bond income plus paying 25% on your 7% capital gains & dividends instead of 15% is better because by putting your stocks in an IRA you avoid delay the annual 15% hit on a fraction of your 7% qualified dividends and gains?

I'd need to walk through the numbers before I believe that. By putting stocks in the IRA I pay more taxes every year and I pay more taxes at liquidation. How can that be better?

My guess is that he's not stepping up the stock basis as he increases the fund turnover percentage and therefore is taxing that twice at 15% each.

My second guess is that he's not rebalancing the portfolio so whatever tax drag hits the equity account compounds forever instead of getting reallocated across both the equity and fixed income positions.

Fix those two things and my third guess is that this issue goes away entirely.

Retired early, traveling perpetually.
Gone4Good is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 05:49 AM   #43
MichaelB's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On the road again
Posts: 21,155
The Kitces analysis assumes the tax rate on the IRA withdrawal final portfolio value is equal in all scenarios. This cannot be - if the final portfolio value is higher for equities vs FI, the IRA marginal tax rate must also be higher.
MichaelB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2016, 07:01 AM   #44
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,933
not always . brackets are pretty wide as well as increase yearly with more and more money going through in lower brackets over time . pretty soon `100k will be in the 15% bracket .

mathjak107 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Equity dividend investing vs equity index investing galeno FIRE and Money 16 01-01-2015 03:51 AM
Suggested growth rate for portfolio growth estimates? doneat58 FIRE and Money 35 10-01-2013 11:03 PM
Emerging and Developing GDP Growth exceeds GDP Growth in Advanced Economies bUU Other topics 3 06-28-2013 11:42 AM
Here Is A Pretty Good Brief In Favor Of Dividend Growth Investing haha FIRE and Money 21 02-09-2012 05:56 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:03 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.