I hate it when I couldn't stand something no more
, and bailed out at the bottom.
What if this sector comes around, now that I am out?
OK, OK, I lied to you.
I did not sell all the shipping stocks I had. I still keep NM, which I have read is the strongest of the bunch (and its relative price strength reflects that). In fact, I still have 28% gain on my lot of NM, as I started to accumulate it from 11/2008 to 3/2010. The other stocks, bought at roughly in the same time frame, gave me a loss.
I first dabbled in shipping stocks in 2007 with DRYS. I bought 150 shares in 6/2007, paying $37. Just 5 months later, the stock reached bubble territory with the price of $130 when the day rate reached $300K. People on CNBC started talking about it. So, I sold 50 shares at $126 to recover my original cost of the entire lot.
The stock started to unravel soon after that, but I did not sell the remaining 100 shares until 7/2008 at $71. In all, I netted near $8K out of this trade on DRYS, or more than doubling my investment.
I did not buy shipping stock again until the end of 2008, but decided that the days of DRYS were over, and started to accumulate other stocks. And as I have told the story earlier, none made me money but NM. But when the earlier gain on DRYS was added, I still have a net gain on this dabble into a sector I still know little about.
When I play with risky individual stocks like this, I keep my involvement to just a fraction of 1% of portfolio in each position. Therefore, when it works out, I do not strike it rich, but do not lose my shirt otherwise. I do not have more than 2% in any single stock. Larger positions are usually in ETFs for diversity.
It's just a thing I do for fun. I fancy myself being my own MF manager, and yet I still have only around 100 stocks. Wellesley has something like near 700 positions, if I remember correctly.