Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Is it a good time to buy more junk?
Old 01-13-2011, 05:56 AM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
Is it a good time to buy more junk?

I've had about 10% of my portfolio in Vanguard High-Yield Corporate Inv (VWEHX) for a few years.....and it's been a bumpy ride, but last year it came back strongly. However I'm also looking at Pimco PTY CEF which did even better. Income only dividend was 16%.....I believe this is so high because of leverage, but they don't seem to be pumping it up with return of capital. However, the fund is trading at a premium and that gives me pause.

Thoughts, opinions on PTY and VWEHX as a pick for this year
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-13-2011, 06:17 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
I would not buy any CEF at a premium, no matter what it holds. That goes double for one with leverage.

As for junk, the market has really appreciated a lot. Terms and conditions have normalized and I expect that we will see increasingly foolish underwriting in the next couple of years. Spreads have also normalized and are compressing. On the whole, the junk market makes me go a big 'ol limp one. I would not be eager to buy here.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 07:11 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
JPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,610
As junk goes, the Vanguard High Yield is regarded as the premium pick for those who enjoy a less junkier grade of junk. For that reason I wouldn't stray too far away if you like high yield with low (er) risk.
If you believe interest rates will rise, you might want to consider a floating rate fund. The FIDO FFRHX is considered one of the better ones. I recently took a chunk of SPHIX and put it into FFRHX. I'm not tampering with my VWEHX however.
JPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 08:19 AM   #4
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
I guess Ill simply rebalance back into Total Bond Market and stop chasing return. When I see PTY's 16% yield and a 28% NAV increase I think my first thought that it comes with loads of risk is correct and I have enough of that with my equity indexes and VWEHX
__________________
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”

Current AA: 75% Equity Funds / 15% Bonds / 5% Stable Value /2% Cash / 3% TIAA Traditional
Retired Mar 2014 at age 52, target WR: 0.0%,
Income from pension and rent
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 08:54 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
And my last true junk individual bond is now the subject of a tender offer because the issuer is refinancing and wants to both push out maturity and (I assume) lower the coupon. I will happily tender for 105 and change. My only other individual bond is a crossover name (rated BBB/investment grade by one agency, BB/junk by another), which I will hang onto until either a strong bid shows up or maturity in 2015.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 09:12 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
FIRE'd@51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,433
I am concerned about rising interest rates. Hence, I don't think this is a good time to be buying bonds. Having said that, if I were to buy bonds, I would lean toward "junk" for two reasons. First, the higher interest rate on junk means a lower duration, and therefore, less interest-rate sensitivity than higher-grade bonds of the same maturity. Second, junk bonds are more highly correlated with equities than higher-grade bonds, and IMO equities are likely to outperform bonds going forward should the economy recover.

Currently, I also have about 10% of my portfolio in VWEAX and our old friends, ISM and OSM (which are inflation-indexed).
__________________
I'd rather be governed by the first one hundred names in the telephone book than the Harvard faculty - William F. Buckley
FIRE'd@51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 09:33 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
veremchuka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: irradiated - too close to the nuclear furnace
Posts: 1,294
10% is a large allocation to junk imo but if you use it as an equity allocation then maybe not. junk bonds typically do well when the equity markets do well and this year "looks" to be a good year, we'll see. however, the time to buy the vanguard fund was dec 2008 when the nav was down in the low to mid $3 range! i bought some in the mid $4 range, it is just 5% of my total holdings. if it looked like the equity markets were about to crash then getting out may be wise. however, as that nav drops the yield goes up, in 12/08 it was around mid 13% or 14%!
veremchuka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2011, 10:08 PM   #8
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 939
I have bought bonds on the secondary market for several years and only slightly got burned (CIT, and they are making good on it). I never buy bonds at a premium - I find ones that are in some financial distress and are maturing in 1 - 4 years.

I don't trust that I can predict what interest rates are going to do, but I'm willing to tie up some of my money for a few years at 6% or (usually) more. Especially if it's in my roth ira so never taxed. (Yeah, I know, they might change the rules etc.)

The main thing is not to put too much money in any one place - sector, type of company, etc.

I have some money in bond mutual funds too, because I inherited them and so far they are yielding around 6% or a little more. I keep an eye on them.

Diversify, diversify... my mantra...
__________________
I used to be “Thinker25” here. Retired at 62, now 73 (in 2021), no regrets & single again. I love it. I’m in RI.
DeborahB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 01:52 AM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Posts: 1,419
If your financial adviser attempts to reduce your exposure to high-yield bonds, should you shout "Hey man, don't touch my junk" ?
BigNick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 05:53 AM   #10
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 512
I put $450,000 in five year CD'S in October of 2007 yielding 4.89%. My banker tried to discourage me and even called in another person with a coat and tie to talk with me. Maybe because I was in old work clothes I looked dumb I know many here would say that was a stupid move but it sure looks good now
oldtrig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 06:04 AM   #11
Moderator
braumeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPatrick View Post
As junk goes, the Vanguard High Yield is regarded as the premium pick for those who enjoy a less junkier grade of junk. For that reason I wouldn't stray too far away if you like high yield with low (er) risk.
If you believe interest rates will rise, you might want to consider a floating rate fund. The FIDO FFRHX is considered one of the better ones.
I recently got some FFRHX, too. Seems to make sense for me.
Never have invested in junk with the exception of VWEHX, and probably won't. Much prefer individual bonds, but I was awakened rudely a couple of years ago when a supposedly safe muni went into default. Fortunately, they were able to call the bond at par when they got bought out after bankruptcy, but it sure got my attention!
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
braumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 06:04 AM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
I don't think it is ever a good time to buy junk bonds. If you read "Liar's Poker" by Michael Lewis there are a few pages about the junk bond market. It will turn you off from them.

Here is another insight: A junk bond has many characteristics of a stock. Just because the name says "bond", many folks believe it is not like a stock. You want your bonds to pay dividends and not go down in value when stocks go down in value. You don't need your bonds to go up in value because your stocks should go up in value when stocks go up in value. So if you plot the "growth of" your junk bond fund along with a stock index fund and say the total bond index fund, what do you see? You see the junk bond fund going up and down with the stock index fund. Your eyes should tell you that the junk bond fund acts just like a stock fund. I have attached a plot for you.

So when folks say, "Oh, my junk bond fund has done great" I just chuckle. They could have just bought a stock fund instead. Or they could've bought Wellesley. Or a combo of a non-junk bond fund and a stock fund.

Thus nun's question in the thread title is really: "Is now a good time to buy a stock fund?"
Attached Images
File Type: jpg junk.jpg (45.6 KB, 14 views)
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 06:15 AM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by braumeister View Post
I recently got some FFRHX, too. Seems to make sense for me.
Be aware that the loans in this fund are junk as well. Just like junk bonds, "leveraged loans" also got destroyed in the crash.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 06:16 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
I don't think it is ever a good time to buy junk bonds.
I would say that this is an extreme view (which you are welcome to). There are excellent times to buy (and sell) junk; fortunes have been made doing so.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."

- George Orwell

Ezekiel 23:20
brewer12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 07:12 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
I don't think it is ever a good time to buy junk bonds.

.... So if you plot the "growth of" your junk bond fund along with a stock index fund and say the total bond index fund, what do you see? You see the junk bond fund going up and down with the stock index fund. Your eyes should tell you that the junk bond fund acts just like a stock fund. I have attached a plot for you.
LOL - While I agree that a junk fund acts somewhat like a stock fund (I enter mine as 50-50 for AA purposes), that chart appears to be NAV, right? If so it is quite misleading, you need to look at total return. The chart makes VWEHX look like it's down ~ 7% over 5 years, while it is actually up 6.33% (whoops, that isn't just "up" overall, it's annual compounded, see math below) per Vanguard.

Ahhh - here's performance charts from Vanguard:

Final numbers (mouse-over at Vanguard to get them) were $13,591 for junk, $11,562 for Total Stock Market. (1.0633^5=1.359186553)

-ERD50
Attached Images
File Type: png VWHEHX vs VTSMX 5YR-2010.png (22.9 KB, 1 views)
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 07:19 AM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345 View Post
I would say that this is an extreme view (which you are welcome to). There are excellent times to buy (and sell) junk; fortunes have been made doing so.
That's exactly like saying:

There are excellent times to buy (and sell) stocks; fortunes have been made doing so.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 07:25 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
ERD50, thanks for the chart. I'm not writing that VWEHX has 100% stock characteristics. It's a mixed of bond-like and stock-like properties. So rather than buying a a junk bond fund, one could buy a mix of stocks and high-quality bond fund.

Suppose one want an asset allocation fo 60% stock and 40% bonds. Would any junk bond folks advocated a 40% holding in junk bonds to the exclusion of other bonds? The portfolio would certainly not have the same risk characteristic of traditional 60:40 portfolio.

Does a portfolio of 60% stocks, 30% investment-grade bonds, and 10% junk bonds behave like a portfolio of 65% stocks and 35% investment-grade bonds?
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 07:32 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,821
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
I don't think it is ever a good time to buy junk bonds.
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/fun...T#hist=tab%3A1

Mouse over the DEC 2008 area, and tell me that wasn't a good time to buy junk.

Sure, that is cherry-picked and a rear-view mirror look, but you did say 'never'.

And I'm not recommending junk to anyone. I've actually done pretty well with mine, but I did get in at what turned out to be good times, and I probably wouldn't call this a good time, but I know nothing.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 08:02 AM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
nun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by veremchuka View Post
10% is a large allocation to junk imo but if you use it as an equity allocation then maybe not. junk bonds typically do well when the equity markets do well and this year "looks" to be a good year, we'll see. however, the time to buy the vanguard fund was dec 2008 when the nav was down in the low to mid $3 range! i bought some in the mid $4 range, it is just 5% of my total holdings. if it looked like the equity markets were about to crash then getting out may be wise. however, as that nav drops the yield goes up, in 12/08 it was around mid 13% or 14%!
As my junk is Vanguard High Yield I count it as 50/50 equity/bonds. I've been in it through the lows and dollar cost average into it. majority of my bonds are vanguard Total Bond Market and Wellesley, but I'm doing a bit of strategizing (dangerous I know) and want to reduce the Total Bond market %age as I'm not to optimistic about Gov debt. Maybe increasing the investment quality corporate bond allocation with some VFICX would be a good move
nun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2011, 08:15 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/fun...T#hist=tab%3A1

Mouse over the DEC 2008 area, and tell me that wasn't a good time to buy junk.

Sure, that is cherry-picked and a rear-view mirror look, but you did say 'never'.

And I'm not recommending junk to anyone. I've actually done pretty well with mine, but I did get in at what turned out to be good times, and I probably wouldn't call this a good time, but I know nothing.

-ERD50

I am sure LOL will answer.... but from what I read in his earlier post... the junk fund acts like an equity fund and IF you would have bought an equity fund in Dec 2008 you would have done better.... hence, never buy junk....

Sooo, IOW, junk is more like equity... and if you want the benefits of a bond, buy bonds and not junk... if you want the benefits of equity (and he is saying it is equity in a way)... buy better equity...

But that is how I interpret what he posted and I could be wrong...
Texas Proud is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The REIT Time to Buy? charlie Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 29 09-22-2009 03:26 PM
Is now a good time to buy TIPS? OhSoClose FIRE and Money 26 10-29-2008 06:57 PM
Time to put some junk in the trunk? soupcxan FIRE and Money 20 08-01-2008 10:49 AM
Time To Buy Bonds? yakers FIRE and Money 30 05-23-2008 12:39 PM
Buy into pension, is this a good buy? igsoy FIRE and Money 23 10-16-2007 01:46 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.