Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Merriman "Ultimate Buy & Hold" Strategy
Old 01-27-2019, 05:26 AM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 900
Merriman "Ultimate Buy & Hold" Strategy

I stumbled into Paul Merriman when he was a guest on another podcast which led me to his podcasts and web site. I found his research very interesting and as a guy who likes numbers, his "tables" pretty informative. His Ultimate Buy & Hold Strategy really caught my attention, especially how he illustrates moving in small steps from 100% S&P 500 to his suggested ideal portfolio. Any of you fans of his or subscribe to his approach? A little more involved mind you with some additional funds to buy and rebalance, but pretty compelling.
DawgMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-27-2019, 07:16 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
His strategy is so 2001 and has been supplanted by a simplified version:
https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38374

But he first got me on to a small-cap and value-tilted portfolio way way back when. You can see this in the very first post of LOL!'s market timing newsletter back in 2011 and even earlier in the Asset Allocation Tutorial back in 2007:
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ial-31324.html (see post #37)

Just be sure to use tax-efficient asset locations.

Also note that now that a couple of decades have passed since this kind of thing has been around, everybody knows about it and the "premiums" are not as high as they were when Merriman first publicized all this. In fact, small caps and value have had some pretty rough years. That has caused some people to abandon the strategy.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 08:28 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
VanWinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tellico Village
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
His strategy is so 2001 and has been supplanted by a simplified version:
https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=38374

But he first got me on to a small-cap and value-tilted portfolio way way back when. You can see this in the very first post of LOL!'s market timing newsletter back in 2011 and even earlier in the Asset Allocation Tutorial back in 2007:
http://www.early-retirement.org/foru...ial-31324.html (see post #37)

Just be sure to use tax-efficient asset locations.

Also note that now that a couple of decades have passed since this kind of thing has been around, everybody knows about it and the "premiums" are not as high as they were when Merriman first publicized all this. In fact, small caps and value have had some pretty rough years. That has caused some people to abandon the strategy.
I believe that from 1976 to 1983, small cap was on a tear. If you remove those 7 years from the returns, they are no better than owning the market as a whole. Will those 7 years occur again, nobody knows nuthin. If you tilted to small cap in 1984, you would have done a lot of extra re-balancing
for no additional return. 35 years is a long time to wait.
__________________
Retired May 13th(Friday) 2016 at age 61.
VanWinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 10:45 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Tampa
Posts: 11,198
Well so far this Jan, Small Cap is outperforming the SP500 by around 3%, but the year is young. haha
__________________
TGIM
Dtail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 10:57 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
... Also note that now that a couple of decades have passed since this kind of thing has been around, everybody knows about it and the "premiums" are not as high as they were when Merriman first publicized all this. In fact, small caps and value have had some pretty rough years. That has caused some people to abandon the strategy.
Yes. The Fama/French three-factor model still argues that small-cap and value characteristics are part of asset pricing. Dimensional Fund Advisors (where they are on the board) is a real believer in portfolio tilts; primarily buying the whole market but with little extra doses of these. Their wide variety of funds basically comprises a DIY tilt kit.

But I'm with you. (Fama isn't.) Any market mis-pricing is ultimately damped out by people trying to take advantage of it.

Nevertheless I did move a Roth to a DFA-blessed advisor as an experiment and I will be watching for a couple of years to see how it looks. Fama got the Nobel. I didn't.
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 11:51 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
mickeyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: South Texas~29N/98W Just West of Woman Hollering Creek
Posts: 6,668
Quote:
moving in small steps from 100% S&P 500 to his suggested ideal portfolio

Is he really suggesting that we should be invested 100% this way? I prefer a more balanced portfolio, 50/50.
__________________
Part-Owner of Texas

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. Groucho Marx

In dire need of: faster horses, younger woman, older whiskey, more money.
mickeyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 12:04 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeyd View Post
Is he really suggesting that we should be invested 100% this way? I prefer a more balanced portfolio, 50/50.
No. He has had a table for years showing the risk/return for asset allocations of equities to bonds from 100:0 to 0:100. He has shown total return, max drawdown, longest losing stretch, etc. Investors then choose where they want to be on the risk spectrum.
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 01:43 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,366
I was roughly following Ultimate Buy & Hold for maybe 15 years. Now I'm converting over to a simple 4 fund portfolio. Hard to say if it gained me anything, but it was wasn't bad either. I'm just not willing to futz with it anymore. And DW may have to take over at some point in the future, so simpler is better now.
Animorph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 02:41 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,669
I followed link from BH article to here:
https://www.marketwatch.com/lazyportfolio?siteId

Second Grade Starter (3-fund) beats others on 10-year anniversary returns.
target2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 02:43 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
VanWinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tellico Village
Posts: 2,596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Animorph View Post
I was roughly following Ultimate Buy & Hold for maybe 15 years. Now I'm converting over to a simple 4 fund portfolio. Hard to say if it gained me anything, but it was wasn't bad either. I'm just not willing to futz with it anymore. And DW may have to take over at some point in the future, so simpler is better now.
+1 Sometimes simple is better. Especially for the surviving spouse and let's face it, no one is getting out of this alive.
__________________
Retired May 13th(Friday) 2016 at age 61.
VanWinkle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2019, 03:30 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
samclem's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 14,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
Nevertheless I did move a Roth to a DFA-blessed advisor as an experiment and I will be watching for a couple of years to see how it looks.
Do you think you can learn anything useful from a sample period this short? There's a long history out there, and if we accept it all (not excluding certain periods for reasons unknown) then it looks like the small and value premiums continue.


Perhaps the markets. as would be predicted by EMH, will eventually get rid of the small/value premium, but it's been known for decades and so far, it persists. I think we'll find the explanation for the persistent small/value premiums in behavioral economics and human processing quirks, and not among the "econs."


ETA: I have a small/value tilt to our holdings, but not a huge one.
samclem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2019, 12:45 PM   #12
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
No. He has had a table for years showing the risk/return for asset allocations of equities to bonds from 100:0 to 0:100. He has shown total return, max drawdown, longest losing stretch, etc. Investors then choose where they want to be on the risk spectrum.

Got the link to this table?
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2019, 04:57 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongleur View Post
Got the link to this table?
When this thread was active, I readily found it via
Google so I will let you repeat my work and post it here. Thanks!
LOL! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2019, 06:09 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongleur View Post
Got the link to this table?
All the variations are right here.

https://paulmerriman.com/distributions-2018/
COcheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 09:02 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcheesehead View Post
All the variations are right here.

https://paulmerriman.com/distributions-2018/
Very nice data.

My WR last year was below 3%, and his tables only go as low as 3% WR. And my WR was without any SS.

Looking at this, I guess I need to "blow some dough", else I would have money coming out the wazoo.

I wonder what my wife would say if I told her I needed more lithium battery for my energy storage shed.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 11:09 AM   #16
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by LOL! View Post
When this thread was active, I readily found it via
Google so I will let you repeat my work and post it here. Thanks!

I use StartPage, which masks me so g** does not insert web beacons into my browser & track me everywhere & monitize my private behavior.


Startpage did not find the particular page using the search terms I can think of.
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 11:18 AM   #17
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcheesehead View Post
All the variations are right here.

https://paulmerriman.com/distributions-2018/



This seems to be the one. Why does he start with odd amounts of money instead of a round $1M? Even accounting for the fact that the first number is the END of year, after the distribution... the odd few thousands would be gains, but that still is a non-round starting number:
Fixed distribution strategy 2018

Retirement Distribution Tables (S&P 500)
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 11:22 AM   #18
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 538
Does he have one with "flexible" schedule (ie a %) with columns for 10% changes in equity:bond ratio (as he does for fixed dollar amount)?
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 11:30 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
NW-Bound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongleur View Post
This seems to be the one. Why does he start with odd amounts of money instead of a round $1M? Even accounting for the fact that the first number is the END of year, after the distribution... the odd few thousands would be gains, but that still is a non-round starting number:
Fixed distribution strategy 2018

Retirement Distribution Tables (S&P 500)
The tables does start out with exactly $1M in Jan 1st, 1970, which is not shown.

You then withdraw $30K, and invest the remaining $970K. On Dec 31st, 1970, the portfolio balance is shown on the first row of the table. This is before withdrawal for 1971.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)

"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
NW-Bound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 12:18 PM   #20
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 538
Darn, I cannot paste these tables from his PDF into Excel. I would like to create a column showing "number of years distributions remaining" so after a year like 2007 you could see "if I bailed out into TIPS I would still have enough for my remaining lifespan."
Bongleur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noticed more people holding signs "need work or food" rayinpenn Other topics 3 05-03-2015 02:51 PM
Paul Merriman: Bonds - buy, sell, or hold? REWahoo FIRE and Money 3 03-26-2014 02:15 PM
Picking Individual Assets for "Ultimate Buy & Hold" studbucket Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 12 07-30-2011 07:40 AM
"Buy & Hold" Asset Allocation article ladelfina FIRE and Money 7 06-09-2007 12:25 PM
Merriman - Sound Investing TK FIRE and Money 8 07-04-2005 03:03 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:36 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.