|
10-06-2016, 06:36 PM
|
#1
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 8,327
|
MetLife Spinoff
MET has setup Brighthouse Financial as a separate unit for its retail life insurance business. Now they have filed to make it a separate public company to be 80% owned by current shareholders. This was somewhat driven by their desire to shed SIFI designation but now it seems like they are isolating an underperforming sector and sticking it to existing shareholders. I guess I don't have the skill to evaluate this and that's why I should stick to funds. I have a pretty nice ST again in MET as things stand now.
I'm having a very bad experience with RR Donnelly right now that just did something similar.
Any thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
__________________
...with no reasonable expectation for ER, I'm just here auditing the AP class.Retired 8/1/15.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-06-2016, 06:50 PM
|
#2
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazz4cash
MET has setup Brighthouse Financial as a separate unit for its retail life insurance business. Now they have filed to make it a separate public company to be 80% owned by current shareholders. This was somewhat driven by their desire to shed SIFI designation but now it seems like they are isolating an underperforming sector and sticking it to existing shareholders. I guess I don't have the skill to evaluate this and that's why I should stick to funds. I have a pretty nice ST again in MET as things stand now.
I'm having a very bad experience with RR Donnelly right now that just did something similar.
Any thoughts?
|
I know there are some examples of those stocks that are stellar performers after being spun-off (like Chipotle). But, like you, my experience with Rayonier Timberlands was poor. The one hope I had was that the CEO was actually leaving Rayonier to join the spinoff (RYAM), their materials division. But it has been an abysmal performer. I had a small neutral spinoff from APD recently, but just went through and cleaned house a bit in my portfolio by selling off the piddly positions that were mostly giant losses that had "more than temporary" declines in value. Or the memories of watching Venture stores being spun off from Lord and Taylor (or was it May Stores?), which my grandfather had way back in the 90s. It was given a nearly impossible-to-survive debt load, while leaving the parent company in a bit better shape.
If I were in your shoes, I'd just take the gains, and sell it. I don't see anything particularly glorious about this new spunoff division, as you note.
__________________
Dryer sheets Schmyer sheets
|
|
|
10-07-2016, 02:13 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 9,343
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MooreBonds
I know there are some examples of those stocks that are stellar performers after being spun-off (like Chipotle). But, like you, my experience with Rayonier Timberlands was poor. The one hope I had was that the CEO was actually leaving Rayonier to join the spinoff (RYAM), their materials division. But it has been an abysmal performer. I had a small neutral spinoff from APD recently, but just went through and cleaned house a bit in my portfolio by selling off the piddly positions that were mostly giant losses that had "more than temporary" declines in value. Or the memories of watching Venture stores being spun off from Lord and Taylor (or was it May Stores?), which my grandfather had way back in the 90s. It was given a nearly impossible-to-survive debt load, while leaving the parent company in a bit better shape.
If I were in your shoes, I'd just take the gains, and sell it. I don't see anything particularly glorious about this new spunoff division, as you note.
|
Venture? I still have some Venture store brand band aides in my bathroom cabinet. I guess I dont cut myself much anymore since the box is still about full.
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 09:50 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 7,591
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazz4cash
MET has setup Brighthouse Financial as a separate unit for its retail life insurance business. Now they have filed to make it a separate public company to be 80% owned by current shareholders. This was somewhat driven by their desire to shed SIFI designation but now it seems like they are isolating an underperforming sector and sticking it to existing shareholders. I guess I don't have the skill to evaluate this and that's why I should stick to funds. I have a pretty nice ST again in MET as things stand now.
I'm having a very bad experience with RR Donnelly right now that just did something similar.
Any thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Early Retirement Forum
|
Spinoffs usually trade down for a time as people unload the spinoff shares. I would not rush to do so.
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 03:54 PM
|
#5
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MooreBonds
But, like you, my experience with Rayonier Timberlands was poor. The one hope I had was that the CEO was actually leaving Rayonier to join the spinoff (RYAM), their materials division. But it has been an abysmal performer.
|
I followed this one too. I think the main issue is that a boyscout was brought in as CEO of RYN (the timber company), and the guy who went with the specialty fluff manufacturing business(RYAM) was the guy who was behind the over- harvesting of NW timber-lands under his leadership. Also, I am not sure that a specialty pulp mainly used in cigarette filters is necessarily a red hot business. I owned boyscout's previous firm under his stewardship for 10 years and feel that he (Nunes) is an extremely competent CEO and also a completely honest one.
Ha
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|