Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Rebalancing suggestions?
Old 02-21-2017, 08:59 PM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Augusta
Posts: 348
Rebalancing suggestions?

I want to balance my portfolio. Currently I have a lot of individual stocks (inherited) in an inherited IRA and also a brokerage account.

In my roth I have mutual funds, indiv stocks, and index fund. I am not happy with it's performance and pricey funds and plan to move it and redo everything. But bonds? I had the idea a roth should be more aggressively invested. Don't know why!

In my traditional deferred account I have a target date fund and an index fund. This can be rolled over from my former employer as well and reallocated if needed. It's pretty affordable where it is now tho as I worked for a local govt.

In another brokerage account I have index funds, a small amount of a target date fund, and a good bit of cash - 12% of my total assets still in cash.

So, about 51% of my assets are in taxable brokerage accounts. Because of my self employed status I probably will not be able to change that ratio, it may very well increase even if I put $6500/yr in the roth. I will not have a large earned income for at least a few years so can't dump tons into deferred iras.

The inherited IRA will have some growth but the rmds will nibble at it. I am happy with it's performance.

I was thinking of one of the balanced funds at vanguard to add some bonds to my portfolio. However, I read that bonds should be held in IRAs, not taxable accounts for tax reasons. I would have to allocate my entire rollover ira to bonds and then some to achieve the recommended balanced portfolio and still keep bonds in an ira! Really, it's not doable.

Am I over thinking this since I am not high income? Is there a tax friendly fund with bonds at vanguard that would be ok in a taxable account?
What about the target date funds at vanguard? Ok to have in a brokerage account?

Or I can just keep sitting on the cash!
Yarnstormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-21-2017, 09:55 PM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
You need to do two things. First, decide what you want your overall AA to be. Second, spreadsheet out where you are and moves that you can make towards that end.

I have a situation very similar to yours... when I retired I was 44/53/3 taxable/tax-deferred/tax free. Since I was 60/40 when I was working my tax-deferred accounts were mostly bonds, and my taxable and tax-free accounts were all equities.

Within tax deferred it is simple... sell equities and buy fixed income.. since there are no tax implications of those trades it is easy. Ditto for tax-free. Taxable is trickier in that you want to avoid your rebalancing resulting in NET taxable gains.

It is doable... and probably easily doable if you really want to do it... the only tricky part is th taxable account.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 01:26 PM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Augusta
Posts: 348
So yes? Important to have bonds in tax deferred vs taxable?
Tough with taxable like you say. I can sell some losers I think.
Yarnstormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 01:59 PM   #4
Full time employment: Posting here.
Whisper66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Houston
Posts: 957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yarnstormer View Post
Is there a tax friendly fund with bonds at vanguard that would be ok in a taxable account?
What about the target date funds at vanguard? Ok to have in a brokerage account? Or I can just keep sitting on the cash!
For tax friendly bond funds, go to this link and apply a filter for "bonds" and "tax exempt" and "tax managed". For our tax managed account, we have some bonds in the VMLUX and VWIUX funds, both are tax exempt municiple funds.

The Vanguard Target Date funds are comprised of a mixture of index funds so I would think would be fine in a taxable account. Even better would be to buy the index funds directly for the taxable account.

Sitting on cash - it's up to your risk tolerance on how much cash to sit on.
Whisper66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 04:15 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yarnstormer View Post
So yes? Important to have bonds in tax deferred vs taxable?
Tough with taxable like you say. I can sell some losers I think.
It all depends on how tax efficient you want to be... if you want to be tax efficient then either bonds in tax-deferred or tax-exempt in taxable. This presumes that you are in a tax bracket where tax-efficiency is worth the effort.

Also, if you sell a loser in your taxable be careful not to negate it by buying the same security in your tax deferred portfolio (wash sale).
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 07:31 PM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Augusta
Posts: 348
Thank you so much for your replies. I will explore the tax exempt and tax managed funds..... At present my need for tax efficiency is not extreme, but as the portfolio grows it might become more important, particularly as I already have taxable rmds that I MUST take that I won't be able to control.

I am sitting on too much cash at present but I figure being so invested in equities it balances out until I add some bonds.
Yarnstormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 08:52 PM   #7
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,622
As one input to your decision into setting your asset allocation, you could look look at one of the gone fishing calculators on this page. You can pick a Vanguard, a Schwab, or a non-affiliated calculator, put in your age and your assets and it will give you a reasonable AA target.

Then, you can use a spreadsheet or you might be able to use MorningStar Instant X-Ray to type in your existing portfolio, or a proposed new portfolio (simulate removal of some existing stuff and acquiring other stuff).

I posted an asset allocation and rebalancing spreadsheet a long time ago, which, apparently, nobody cared about (or at least nobody commented upon). You probably would need to be a spreadsheet "expert" to make it work. I talk about it here, and the link to it is here.
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 09:29 PM   #8
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Augusta
Posts: 348
Hey that's pretty cool!
I have the suggested allocation re Vanguard to go by. Vanguard also allows you to input outside investments so I did that except for the work ira ones that were not available to input. So, I get a reasonable idea of my current situation using that method.

It's very impressive how carefully some of you track your percentages and adjust accordingly. I'll download the spreadsheet and have a look. Thanks for sharing!
Yarnstormer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2017, 10:23 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Another tool you may find useful is Vanguard's Portfolio Tester... you can put in projected trades and see how it changes your AA.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2017, 03:06 PM   #10
Moderator
sengsational's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yarnstormer View Post
Vanguard also allows you to input outside investments so I did that except for the work ira ones that were not available to input.
Just to put a little finer point on it, what you could do for the work IRA assets is use a similar publicly traded fund. It won't be 100% accurate, but it probably will be very close.

So for instance, say you're invested in a "Total US Equities" as a company investment offering. If you search "Vanguard Total US Equities, you see ETF called "VTI". So you'd add enough shares of VTI in whatever you use to measure your allocation to match your IRA balance. Occasionally you might need to adjust the number of shares to realign the balance, but these things tend to track fairly closely to each other. By the way, I didn't even know Vanguard had it, but it does have "My Accounts > Portfolio Watch > Asset Allocation". Unfortunately, it looks like hard assets are not really managed the way I like. For instance, metals/mining is shown as "other" and REIT is put with US Mid/Small Equities. Seems like "hard assets" would be a reasonable additional category, but that's just me.

As to how detailed to be about it, it doesn't have to be super precise. What matters more is consistency. So if the method you use to measure your allocation is consistent, it doesn't matter too much if it is off by a few percent. Picking an AA target and sticking with it, that's the most important thing. Even if your method of measuring against it isn't perfect, as long as it's consistent, that's the important thing.
sengsational is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rebalancing within a fund cc FIRE and Money 0 02-24-2005 08:51 AM
Accumulation phase and rebalancing Cal FIRE and Money 5 10-13-2004 12:33 PM
Rebalancing Approaches WilliamG FIRE and Money 2 04-30-2004 11:14 AM
Value added by continuous rebalancing? charlie FIRE and Money 14 02-21-2004 02:31 PM
Rebalancing? dory36 FIRE and Money 2 10-02-2002 03:50 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.