Originally Posted by Gone4Good
My comment wasn't meant as a criticism but rather a description. ...
So defensive at the top and aggressive at the bottom. Definitely a simple rule that yields a contrarian portfolio.
OK. I guess I read it as a bit of both. Thanks for the explanation.
Yes, it does seem to provide an interesting approach, and I am giving some consideration to some kind of rebalancing a fund like that with some others, maybe some non-correlation can work for me?