Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Adjustable pension plan design begins to gain converts
Old 05-01-2013, 09:50 AM   #1
Full time employment: Posting here.
SumDay's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 738
Adjustable pension plan design begins to gain converts

Very interesting article on a "new" plan design:

The plan design shares the investment risk between employees and employers while providing more retirement income security than a typical defined contribution plan.
Not really a cash balance, which was my first thought as I started reading it:

What differentiates the adjustable plan from a cash balance plan is that the cash balance plan benefit is determined by a benchmark such as 10-year Treasuries; the adjustable plan's benefit depends on actual investment performance of the plan.

SumDay is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 05-01-2013, 10:13 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 10,663
Interesting idea that falls between conventional DB and DC. The proposal goes a long way to addressing the education-saving discipline-personal responsibility issues that have plagued 401k's and seemingly eliminates the uncertainty-risk issues that led companies to drop DB plans.

However, I'd hate to see (the indiv tax benefits of) 401k plans go away. And companies that adopt APP plans would presumably end 401k matching and (fairly IMO) put those contributions toward the APP plans instead. I don't see them contributing to both DC matching and adding APP on top of that.

I'd like to see how the APP benefits fluctuate though, the article really didn't seem to shed any light on that...

No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 60% equity funds / 35% bond funds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 2.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2013, 09:10 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,636
I see a traditional DB plan with "more conservative" investment assumptions. The conservative assumptions lead to lower guaranteed benefits. If the pooled investments can beat the assumptions, the excess is used to increase the benefits.

Employers have less risk than DB plans simply because they are guaranteeing lower numbers. Workers have less risk than DC because there is a floor benefit. Workers have much less flexibility/control than with a DC plan. Some people think that's a good thing.

IMO, one of the biggest problems with US DB pensions is that the benefits are based on some limited "highest consecutive months" salary. In most cases, this backloads the benefit accruals. Workers take a lot of employment risk - losing your job sometime in your 50's can substantially cut your pension.

Years ago, when I was studying for pensions for a financial certificate, I thought I came up with a better plan. Like this Adjustable Pension idea, there was a guaranteed benefit with the potential of using investment results to boost the guarantee. Unlike this idea, guaranteed benefits were based on career average salaries. But, the assumed interest rate was much lower (2.5-3.0%), which made investment gains much more likely.
Independent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2013, 10:16 AM   #4
ziggy29's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,419
Originally Posted by Independent View Post
IMO, one of the biggest problems with US DB pensions is that the benefits are based on some limited "highest consecutive months" salary. In most cases, this backloads the benefit accruals. Workers take a lot of employment risk - losing your job sometime in your 50's can substantially cut your pension.
Yes, this is often true. In theory, someone working 40 years at one company will probably get a much higher total pension than someone with four pensions with 10 years of service each, assuming identical salaries along the way.

But the biggest problem with DB pensions as we know them is what has made them turn out to feel unsustainable: a guaranteed level of benefits regardless of what happens to life expectancies and the underlying investments of the pension fund. This requires a certain level of funding (which employers often neglect) AND a certain assumed ROI of the pension fund (many of them have expected 8% or more which is IMO not realistic in the long term if the fund has a prudent asset allocation).
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:25 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.