Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Pledge to America
Old 09-23-2010, 03:41 PM   #1
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
Pledge to America

I went through the Republican's "Pledge to America", looking for items of particular interest to either younger or older retirees. There were just a few...

People on SS and Medicare seem to get a free ride on their only big spending cut
Quote:
With common-sense exceptions for seniors, veterans, and our troops, we will roll back government spending to prestimulus, pre-bailout levels
I'd guess this means "build public support for cutting SS and Medicare someday by publicizing the 'unfunded liabilities' "
Quote:
We will make the decisions that are necessary to protect our entitlement programs for today’s seniors and future generations. That means requiring a full accounting of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, setting benchmarks for these programs and reviewing them regularly,

And, of course, there is the healthcare bill
Quote:
Repeal the Costly Health Care Takeover of 2010

Independent is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 09-24-2010, 04:06 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
And yet another thread that I hope survives without getting the "Political Boot."
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:10 AM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBoyd View Post
And yet another thread that I hope survives without getting the "Political Boot."
Why?
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:17 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by harley View Post
Why?
Not enough fun in my life?
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:29 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: No fixed abode
Posts: 8,764
Well, the concept of repealing the Health Care plan is just blowing smoke, since even if the repubs take both houses there's no chance they'll have enough votes to override the inevitable veto as long as there's a dem in the white house.

As far as rolling back spending to pre-stimulus levels, as I remember spending under the small gov't bunch was pretty outrageous, too. I don't see anything world shaking there.

I think it would take a lot more cojones than most sitting pols have to offer a plan that would really address the spending problems this country has. Assuming one is of the group that thinks controlling spending is the way to solve our economic woes, it would be nice to see a plan that actually does some of it. Like Paul Ryan's plan, and that one still wouldn't balance the budget until 2063. If you are of the group that follows Paul Krugman's ideas of "live rich to be rich", a true Republican plan would give you something to rally against. But the way things are, you can't tell the players without a scorecard.

Edit: The only aspects of it I personally really like is the concept of certifying each bill as "constitutional" before it is passed, and the requirement to actually read a bill before it is passed. But I flat out think they are lying about those.
__________________
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement." - Anonymous (not Will Rogers or Sam Clemens)
DW and I - FIREd at 50 (7/06), living off assets
harley is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 05:51 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
And speaking of Krugman:

Downhill With the G.O.P.

Quote:
Once upon a time, a Latin American political party promised to help motorists save money on gasoline. How? By building highways that ran only downhill.
Quote:
On Thursday, House Republicans released their “Pledge to America,” supposedly outlining their policy agenda. In essence, what they say is, “Deficits are a terrible thing. Let’s make them much bigger.” The document repeatedly condemns federal debt — 16 times, by my count. But the main substantive policy proposal is to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, which independent estimates say would add about $3.7 trillion to the debt over the next decade — about $700 billion more than the Obama administration’s tax proposals.
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:15 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,317
Neither party is serious about cutting the deficit. If they were they would stay with the original Bush proposed return to the Clinton tax level (with a temporary extension of the middle class tax cuts to let the recovery progress further). Instead the Dems would make the middle class cuts permanent because they are afraid of the truth and the GOP wants to make them all permanent to ensure the super-rich continue pulling away from the rest of us. Neither party is capable of cutting spending to a level that fits the current tax level.

It would seem to go without saying that discussions of taxing, spending, deficits, and deceit are relevant to an ER forum.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:43 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff View Post
Neither party is serious about cutting the deficit.
Yeah, but there are a few individuals that are making stabs at trying. For instance:

Congressional Pay Grows 15 Times Faster Than Social Security Checks

Quote:
Seniors who retired in 1990 with the average Social Security benefit have seen their annual payments increase by just $4,967 over the past 20 years. During the same time period, members of Congress have awarded themselves pay raises totaling $77,400 per year – a whopping 1,458 percent more than seniors.
Congressional Corner: By U. S. Representative Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ)

Quote:
I have dedicated myself to making the voices of the people heard. In addition to pushing my congressional pay cut bill, I voted to stop the automatic congressional pay increase for 2010 and 2011 and have co-sponsored bills to eliminate the automatic raise altogether.

I have also put my money where my mouth is, and I am returning five percent of my pay for this year. I am sending monthly $870 checks to pay down the national debt. I strongly believe that when millions of Americans are tightening their belts, they have the right to expect their elected officials to do the same.
The 27 Individuals.
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 07:31 AM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
Perhaps reducing waxy buildup is just what this country needs...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pledge.jpg (30.0 KB, 292 views)
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire

...not doing anything of true substance...
HFWR is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 07:51 AM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RonBoyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 6,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by HFWR View Post
Perhaps reducing waxy buildup is just what this country needs...
See. Now that's the fun part.
__________________
"It's tough to make predictions, especially when it involves the future." ~Attributed to many
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is." ~(perhaps by) Yogi Berra
"Those who have knowledge, don't predict. Those who predict, don't have knowledge."~ Lau tzu
RonBoyd is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 09:32 AM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
bbbamI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Collin County, TX
Posts: 9,294
Postcards from the Pledge...

Postcards From the Pledge - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 9/23/2010 - Video Clip | Comedy Central
__________________
There's no need to complicate, our time is short..
bbbamI is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 09:32 AM   #12
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Texarkandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,281
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBoyd View Post
And yet another thread that I hope survives without getting the "Political Boot."
Personally I am shocked it's still open.

(The day is young yet, I suppose.)
__________________
Retired 2009!
Texarkandy is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 09:46 AM   #13
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 116
"Neither party is serious about cutting the deficit."

How true.

The last time they were in power, the republicans increase discretionary spending by 48.5% in Bush's first term & 20.6% in the second.* And they can't blame the democrats for the first 6 years as republicans had control of both houses then. And remember the Iraq/Afghanistan wars were off budget.

*first term figure from

Bush is the biggest spender since LBJ | McClatchy


second term calculated from page 5 of

http://http://www.cbo.gov/budget/data/historical.pdf
tjscott0 is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 09:52 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
dex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,105
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independent View Post
I went through the Republican's "Pledge to America", looking for items of particular interest to either younger or older retirees. There were just a few...
The Republicans have very bad marketers in their camp. The mistake they make is that they give people the club with which they get hit over the head.

They do not learn from the Democratic Party that you make
amorphous proclamation that people and groups of people can think talks to/for them.

In the end, neither party will address the deficit, it will just be kicked down the road.
__________________
Sometimes death is not as tragic as not knowing how to live. This man knew how to live--and how to make others glad they were living. - Jack Benny at Nat King Cole's funeral
dex is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 10:19 AM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonBoyd View Post
And yet another thread that I hope survives without getting the "Political Boot."
Odd. I was careful to select only those items with direct impact on retirees. My take is this:

Older retirees get one more assurance that they get a free pass. No politician is willing to cut benefits for people who are already "seniors".

Younger retirees can feel pretty good about SS, at least for quite a while. If the strongest statement the R's can come up with is to "look at some numbers carefully", it's going to be a long while before SS takes a hit.

Younger retirees buying their own individual health insurance (or near retirees thinking about it) have opinions on whether that bill helps or hurts them (may depend on their health status). But I'll agree that as long as we have a D in the Whitehouse, the law won't get completely overturned. Even the R's say later on in the "Pledge" they would require insurer's to "provide coverage" for pre-existing conditions.

(That said, I agree with the multiple comments above that neither party is willing to address the deficit, in spite of many vague claims otherwise.)
Independent is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 10:32 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
Quote:
Seniors who retired in 1990 with the average Social Security benefit have seen their annual payments increase by just $4,967 over the past 20 years. During the same time period, members of Congress have awarded themselves pay raises totaling $77,400 per year – a whopping 1,458 percent more than seniors.
Looks like the Senior Citizen League is a little math challenged. Using the link:

SS retirees got a 75% increase (exactly equal to CPI-W)
House members got 80%
Senators got 77%
Independent is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 11:50 AM   #17
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 886
1) you will know that people are serious about reforming social security when they declare the Spousal Benefit to be welfare
2) you will know that people are serious about the deficit when they target agricultural price supports.
3) you will know they are serious about size of government when they count the TOTAL of government employees and contractors.
4) You will know they are serious about pork barrel politics when they make and keep a "no earmarks" pledge

Until then its just same old same old
Emeritus is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 11:54 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texarkandy View Post
Personally I am shocked it's still open.
Probably because it *is* in the politics section, it is referencing issues related to retirement (particularly Social Security, Medicare and health care reform) and because name-calling and flames haven't erupted yet. As long as that remains the case, it is not against the Community Rules. If it turns nasty or blatantly partisan/ideological, the Pig could make an appearance -- but not yet.

Now carry on and stay civil.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 12:00 PM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,682
Remember, it was the Republicans who let PAYGO and the spending caps of the 1990s expire so they could cut taxes and increase spending at the same time while already running a deficit. There was no fiscal offset to enacting Medicare Part D or to the dividend tax cut, for example.

I saw Jon Stewart's piece on The Daily Show when it replayed this morning. It was great.

I agree that neither party is serious about cutting the deficit. Donheff's post (#7 above) is on the mark.

I always get annoyed when I hear the Republicans say, "Now is not the time to raise taxes....", implying that there is a "right" time to raise taxes. You can be sure that whatever the economic situation is, the Republicans will ALWAYS say, "Now is not the time to raise taxes..." and give some reason to support that statement. This is because their position is to never raise taxes and to then figure out a reason later to justify that preconceived position. This is the opposite of how the reasoning process should take place. [Jon Stewart touched lightly on this the other night on The Daily Show. I wish he had expanded on it.]

Minor point about the degree of Republicans being in charge while Bush was president - He had a total GOP congress for just under 4 1/2 years of his 8 years. That would include his middle 4 years from 2003-2006 and about 4 1/2 months in 2001 (from January 20 until ~June 6) before Senator Jeffords switched parties and gave control of the Senate to the Dems until the GOP recaptured the Senate after the 2002 elections.

This Pledge is basicaly an "I hate Obama and Democrats" platform along with the typical "reduce the deficit but keep cutting taxes" contradiction, a "cut spending but don't touch entitlements, national defense, or interest on the debt" (that's most of the spending!), and a social conservatives wishlist (against same-sex marriage, against abortion, favor religion).

How are these Republicans supposed to be any different and more fiscally responsible than the ones who got us into this mess?
__________________
Retired in late 2008 at age 45. Cashed in company stock, bought a lot of shares in a big bond fund and am living nicely off its dividends. IRA, SS, and a pension await me at age 60 and later. No kids, no debts.

"I want my money working for me instead of me working for my money!"
scrabbler1 is offline  
Old 09-24-2010, 12:04 PM   #20
Moderator Emeritus
Bestwifeever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 17,773
Keeping the discussion focused on how the OP contents would be directly effecting retirees might help keep the thread open. Bashing either political party won't.
__________________
“Would you like an adventure now, or would you like to have your tea first?” J.M. Barrie, Peter Pan
Bestwifeever is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Still Made In America HFWR Other topics 2 06-28-2010 05:06 PM
Why is America not angry? Retire Soon FIRE and Money 105 10-01-2008 09:34 AM
best city in america mn54 Life after FIRE 53 08-10-2008 06:45 AM
Where the money is in America...still NE! Orchidflower Life after FIRE 40 05-08-2008 09:23 AM
Nothing Wrong With America That Can't Be Fixed By What's Right With America Danny Other topics 12 02-17-2007 11:06 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:03 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.