Join Early Retirement Today
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-05-2011, 01:22 PM   #101
Gumby's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,220
One need only look at the California system of ballot propositions to see the downside of direct democracy. What a mess.

Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
Gumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 03-05-2011, 01:29 PM   #102
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
clifp's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,427
Originally Posted by Gumby View Post
The tyranny of the majority can occur in both a republic and a democracy.
Better to have tyranny of the majority, than a tyranny of minority. Especially as it so often happens in the Africa and the Middle East, the minority consists of a single tribe, or a few families.

clifp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 01:40 PM   #103
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,895
Originally Posted by clifp View Post
Better to have tyranny of the majority, than a tyranny of minority.
Ranking of tyrannies, hmm. Persecution of Jews in Germany enjoyed popular support. Slavery in US Southern states enjoyed popular support. Most Rwandans are Hutus, and they just went along with popular demand when they killed ten thousand Tutsis each day for months. Majority rules.

I'm not sure that oppression of people is "better" if it is perpetrated by a majority rather than a minority.

When we look back on tyrannies and oppression, the most egregious examples of taking of life, liberty, and property have been conducted by a majority against a minority (poor against rich, majority religion against minority religion, etc). Government power unfettered by strong restrictions is very dangerous whether leaders represent a majority or a minority. That's why elections in these countries, in themselves, mean very little.
"Freedom begins when you tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite." - R. Heinlein
samclem is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 02:52 PM   #104
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
I think that if you took a long term view and plotted the number of countries and the percentage of the world population living under a government with an "equitable balance" between majority rule and minority rights for say the last 2000 years that it would show a very favorable trend and that the trend is no longer unique to countries with a western European, judeo/christian heritage.

Despite the ups and downs I think that the long term trend is in the right direction. Despite the demographic factors that oppose it maybe it is now the Arab worlds turn?
mb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 03:04 PM   #105
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
Originally Posted by 73ss454 View Post
Only thing I can figure is that we support the middle east countries by having to buy their oil. What would they do to support themselves if we used our own oil. So to keep peace in the world we let them rip us off.
Well, since it costs a lot more money to find and produce oil in the US than in the middle east our costs would go way, way up and since the demand for middle east oil would go down the Chinese could but it for a lot, lot cheaper.

So the net is that we pay more while exhausting the reserves that we do have and everyone else pays less.

Is that a favorable scenario?

mb is offline   Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wikileaks Egypt USA dex Other topics 1 01-31-2011 09:34 AM
6 Events That Could Trigger Retirement Midpack FIRE and Money 20 11-15-2010 05:31 AM
What have we/I learned from the recent events? doxeyweb FIRE and Money 46 09-30-2008 08:28 PM
FIRE? Go to sporting events! Berkshire_Bull Young Dreamers 2 10-28-2004 06:43 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.