Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Underfunded pensions? Anyone here have their pension payments reduced?
Old 02-06-2012, 08:30 AM   #1
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 129
Underfunded pensions? Anyone here have their pension payments reduced?

This is sad. So much worry to pensioners that should instead be enjoying a worry free retirement.

Newpage pensions severely underfunded - Atlantic Business - Cape Breton Post
Frugalityisthenewblack is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 02-06-2012, 08:39 AM   #2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,202
And Canada no less. Unfortunately we're probably going to see more stories like this in the years ahead. Another reason I took a lump sum 7 months ago instead of a pension, bird in hand. Even though I have neither and I hope my fears are completely unfounded, pensions and annuities may not be quite as bulletproof as people assume in the years ahead. YMMV
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is online now  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:27 AM   #3
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,154
I see a revolution on the horizon.
ripper1 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:13 AM   #4
Recycles dryer sheets
justplainbll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Easten Long Island
Posts: 414
I knew people from NY Dock Company and Franklin National Bank who lost their pensions.
justplainbll is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:57 AM   #5
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 362
Yes. Wisconsin Retirement System is set up quite differently than most others. Those invested in the core funds will see -4 to -4.5% this yr while the variable fund investors will see -8%. We've been thru this for the last couple years so we just reduce our expenses and live with it. Technically it only affects Dh's pension since mine is set up differently.
kz is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 07:06 PM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplainbll View Post
I knew people from NY Dock Company and Franklin National Bank who lost their pensions.

Can you explain this? As I understand it, private pensions are insured by the PBGC, and only 'high income' pensioners will see a reduction (not loss) of their pension.

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 07:27 PM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frugalityisthenewblack View Post
This is sad. So much worry to pensioners that should instead be enjoying a worry free retirement.

Newpage pensions severely underfunded - Atlantic Business - Cape Breton Post
From that article:

Quote:
the disturbing news that their pension funds are underfunded by up to 41 per cent

Hmmmm, does that mean they are at least 59% funded? That would be good news for the Illinois Teachers Retirement fund (~43% funding IIRC)!

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 07:53 PM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
Read "Retirement Heist' which documents how companies were able to drain pension funds and use them for other purposes and then, a few years later, management cried about their pension system being "underfunded'. Oh, for some strange reason, the executive pension systems never had their assets drained off. I wonder why?
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 07:59 PM   #9
Administrator
Alan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Can you explain this? As I understand it, private pensions are insured by the PBGC, and only 'high income' pensioners will see a reduction (not loss) of their pension.

-ERD50
I believe PBGC takes over the fund when it drops to 70% so I don't understand what happened here either.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
Alan is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:06 PM   #10
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
Read "Retirement Heist' which documents how companies were able to drain pension funds and use them for other purposes and then, a few years later, management cried about their pension system being "underfunded'. Oh, for some strange reason, the executive pension systems never had their assets drained off. I wonder why?
They (management) simply diverts the benefits intended for employees into their own pockets.
__________________
May we live in peace and harmony and be free from all human sufferings.
Spanky is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:21 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
Read "Retirement Heist' which documents how companies were able to drain pension funds and use them for other purposes and then, a few years later, management cried about their pension system being "underfunded'. Oh, for some strange reason, the executive pension systems never had their assets drained off. I wonder why?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spanky View Post
They (management) simply diverts the benefits intended for employees into their own pockets.
We discussed that book in a thread a while back. The characterizations you apply do not seem accurate to me.

As I recall from that thread, every one of those employees received their full pension. 100% (possible exception for 'high earners'?). There may have been some accounting tricks to call the fund 'over-funded' so they could move funds from there for other purposes, but they paid the benefits.

In the US, if a private pension becomes underfunded below PBGC limits, actions are taken, which can include being taken over by the PBGC and payments are made from the 'insurance' payments that all US private pension systems pay into. No tax dollars are used (I'm assuming the fees cover admin also, but I don't know that).

Apparently, for public pensions, it was assumed the taxpayer would be the 'insurance'. It's looking like that is not always the case. Ironic that private pensions are required by the government to have insurance, but the government does not require that for govt pensions.

PS - be very careful with sloppy typos, 'pension' and spell-check


-ERD50
ERD50 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 03:13 AM   #12
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 127
When my company was taken over they froze pensions.No they did not have money problems,big company.I lost half my pension because they said it was backended.Did not matter that I put in near 30years and was counting on it in a few years.Luckily for me I invested a lot and lived below my means.Held on a few more years and we got a severance package.Don"T hear much news or pols. talking about this "legal thievery".Read Pension Dumping.You"ll see what I mean.My company did not grandfather anyone in.Like the character 'Fox Mulder" on X- FILES use to say... "Trust No One".
okapi is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 04:32 AM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
obgyn65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: midwestern city
Posts: 4,061
I agree with ERD50. His explanations below are correct IMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
In the US, if a private pension becomes underfunded below PBGC limits, actions are taken, which can include being taken over by the PBGC and payments are made from the 'insurance' payments that all US private pension systems pay into. No tax dollars are used

-ERD50
__________________
Very conservative with investments. Not ER'd yet, 48 years old. Please do not take anything I write or imply as legal, financial or medical advice directed to you. Contact your own financial advisor, healthcare provider, or attorney for financial, medical and legal advice.
obgyn65 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 06:36 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
We discussed that book in a thread a while back. The characterizations you apply do not seem accurate to me.

As I recall from that thread, <snip>

-ERD50
The book is much more authoritative than a thread. I suggest reading the book.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 06:50 AM   #15
Recycles dryer sheets
justplainbll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Easten Long Island
Posts: 414
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
Can you explain this? As I understand it, private pensions are insured by the PBGC, and only 'high income' pensioners will see a reduction (not loss) of their pension.

-ERD50
They got the shaft prior to the establishment of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. I seem to recall correctly some time ago the max pension payout was 25k per person per year. Franklin National bit the dust in either the late 60's or early 70's. NY Dock Company was taken over by the then Port of New York Authority.
justplainbll is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 07:05 AM   #16
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Naples
Posts: 2,179
Interesting thread and posts. I googled General Motors pension fund and found an article from the Detroit News dated 1-12-12 which stated that GM's world wide pension liability is $122B and is underfunded by $22B which equates to 82% funding. The big discussion in the article is that GM's is considering offering buyouts to certain retirees, as this retirement fund debt is killing the company. It will be interesting to see where this discussion leads.
JOHNNIE36 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 07:05 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
.....Oh, for some strange reason, the executive pension systems never had their assets drained off. I wonder why?
Your statement doesn't make much sense.

Most companies' non-qualified pensions, which would include executive pensions above ERISA limits, are unfunded so there are no assets that are dedicated to providing benefits like there are with qualified plans where pension assets are separate from company assets. Rabbi trusts are sometimes used, but even those are subject to creditor claims in bankruptcy.
pb4uski is online now  
Old 02-07-2012, 08:01 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
FinanceDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
As I recall from that thread, every one of those employees received their full pension. 100% (possible exception for 'high earners'?). There may have been some accounting tricks to call the fund 'over-funded' so they could move funds from there for other purposes, but they paid the benefits.
The benefit were guaranteed by buying a policy from the insurer that guaranteed the benefits on an actuarial basis. This freed up the pension money "sitting there" for other purposes......

Quote:
In the US, if a private pension becomes underfunded below PBGC limits, actions are taken, which can include being taken over by the PBGC and payments are made from the 'insurance' payments that all US private pension systems pay into. No tax dollars are used (I'm assuming the fees cover admin also, but I don't know that).
Maybe back in the old days that was true, but PBGC is very underfunded and they do have recourse to the Treasury/taxpayers if they get into trouble, so our tax dollars will be used if need be, much like FDIC........

Quote:
Apparently, for public pensions, it was assumed the taxpayer would be the 'insurance'. It's looking like that is not always the case. Ironic that private pensions are required by the government to have insurance, but the government does not require that for govt pensions.
That's because the govt always has the "fall-back position" of Congress and the Treasury.......
__________________
Consult with your own advisor or representative. My thoughts should not be construed as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results (love that one).......:)


This Thread is USELESS without pics.........:)
FinanceDude is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 08:24 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuckanut View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERD50 View Post
We discussed that book in a thread a while back. The characterizations you apply do not seem accurate to me.

As I recall from that thread,...
The book is much more authoritative than a thread. I suggest reading the book.
No thanks. I've read the facts about the PBGC, and the responses in that thread kept dancing around the fact that those people were paid their pensions. I don't care to waste my time with a sensationalist 'look what that big mean Corp did' designed to play to people who hate 'big mean Corps'. I like facts.



RE: I knew people from NY Dock Company and Franklin National Bank who lost their pensions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by justplainbll View Post
They got the shaft prior to the establishment of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. ... Franklin National bit the dust in either the late 60's or early 70's. NY Dock Company was taken over by the then Port of New York Authority.
OK, thanks for the explanation. Had to look it up, but PBGC went into effect in 1974/75.

Quote:
Originally Posted by okapi View Post
When my company was taken over they froze pensions.No they did not have money problems,big company.I lost half my pension because they said it was backended.Did not matter that I put in near 30years and was counting on it in a few years. ...
Wording is important here. I don't understand how you could have 'lost half your pension' that you put in over 30 years (unless you were a high earner - max PBGC payout is $54,000 a year as of 2011). Perhaps they cut the formula for what you would earn going forward (which would not affect what was already earned)?

I'd sure like to know if my Corp pension is subject to being cut in half. Everything I read tells me that the PBGC would make me 100% whole regardless of company actions.


Quote:
Originally Posted by okapi View Post
Like the character 'Fox Mulder" on X- FILES use to say... "Trust No One".
Good advice.

PS - is your space bar intermittent?

-ERD50
ERD50 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 08:53 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinanceDude View Post
Maybe back in the old days that was true, but PBGC is very underfunded and they do have recourse to the Treasury/taxpayers if they get into trouble, so our tax dollars will be used if need be, much like FDIC...
I skimmed their huge pdf - if I read it right, it looks like they pay out ~ $5.5B/year, take in $2.4B in premiums, and have $70B on hand.

So that's a pretty good cushion, unless of course pensions starting failing at a much higher rate. That's certainly possible, but it seems the PBGC could certainly raise their premiums w/o too much pain ($35/person and 0.9% of the unfunded %). Doubling or tripling wouldn't be a huge hardship. Increasing the underfunded fee would encourage better funding.

Unfortunately, The PBGC appears to be among the worst of the market timers:

Quote:
In 2004, it chose to invest heavily in bonds.[6] Under new leadership, the agency in 2008 shifted a substantial portion of its assets into stocks.[7]



-ERD50
ERD50 is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lump Sum pension and GPO akck FIRE and Money 13 02-18-2017 06:11 PM
California proposal for pension reform MichaelB FIRE and Money 88 11-05-2011 09:42 PM
RE and forgoing pension income Grainiac FIRE and Money 7 08-08-2011 08:46 PM
Most Americans In the Dark About Their Pensions mickeyd FIRE and Money 55 08-02-2011 06:52 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.