Alex said:Yep, my california real estate has been horrible! I only made a 615,000% return.
So what did you buy at what price and what's it worth now? How did you get a 615000% return?
Alex said:Yep, my california real estate has been horrible! I only made a 615,000% return.
Alex said:I bought my first home in California with $1.00 down thanks to the VA. Do the math.
well, math is math. So if you have ZERO invested in an investment, you have made infinite returns as soon as you make a penny! - bravo to you. In my case, owning california real estate has made me very lucrative returns that are nothing to scoff at. There is more than one road to wealth.justin said:Oh, that kind of math!!! So using this system of mathematics, I've made 10000000000000000000000% returns before where my basis was zero. Example - the cisco stock I bought in 1999 on margin and then had it double. I paid zero down for it, and then it made me 10000000000000000000000%+ return on my initial investment. Or the time I made $5000 in a year from arbitraging 0% interest credit card balance transfer money. Zero invested, $5000 returns = 10000000000000000000000%+ rate of return.
Seriously, I thought maybe you had bought a teardown in a declining neighborhood for, say, $1000 30-40 years ago and then sold it recently for $6.15 million (mostly land value). Say, if some big luxury development wanted to build and your property happened to be within their desired building footprint and they bought you out.
I am confused are you telling me that you didn't put any additional payments on this house? Just $1?Alex said:well, math is math. So if you have ZERO invested in an investment, you have made infinite returns as soon as you make a penny! - bravo to you. In my case, owning california real estate has made me very lucrative returns that are nothing to scoff at. There is more than one road to wealth.
perinova said:I am confused are you telling me that you didn't put any additional payments on this house? Just $1?
What you made as of today is really [today's value - all previous payments - remaining loan], not [today's value - downpayment].
But of course I think you know that.
You have to live somewhere, don't you? I figure that if I paid rent for an equivalent house over all these years it would have worked out to a wash at the worst case. It may have been slightly more expensive in the first few years, but over twenty years rent has increased dramatically. By contrast, my real estate taxes and mortgage payment are fixed. Maintenance has been very very minor. Oh, Did I mention I have been writing off the mortgage interest on my loan all of these years? I think that oughta more than cover the maintenance and insurance. . So yeah, I put a buck in the house.justin said:As Alex says, "Well, math is math." As computer users know, garbage in, garbage out.
Alex also has a maintenance free house and a property tax exemption and never paid any insurance bills on this house. I've always heard California was nice, but I never knew it was this nice.
macdaddy said:Once prices hit 2003 levels they were snatched up. Maybe this is a bottom?
macdaddy said:An update... it took me by complete surprise but everything I have been following in Boston seems to have sold in the last two weeks. Even some less than perfect units in "bad" locations (in an overall nice area). Once prices hit 2003 levels they were snatched up. Maybe this is a bottom?
I also noticed limited amount of for-sale signs.newguy888 said:many of those homes were taken off the market and have not sold. That has happened here in NJ.
perinova said:I also noticed limited amount of for-sale signs.
IYHO why do you think this is?
I can just think of those possible reasons:
- A holiday reprieve?
- Will be rental Units?
- Did they refi?
- People will stay put?
- Do they think (wrongly or not) that the market will pick up steam?
tryan said:At the risk of repeating myself, it'll take a deep recession to find a real bottom. We've got time.
2B said:I'll chime in here with my experience in a couple of real estate collapses. When the market "slows," people won't sell if they don't have to move and people will do alot to avoid moving if it means eating a big home loss. The market is then made up of divorces and repos. As long as the jobs hold up, the amount of repos is small and only the froth comes out of the market. When job losses mount, it's time to watch the toilet flush. In my experience a market "readjustmet" takes about 2 to 3 years to be fully felt and then the new real estate base is formed for prices to start to move up. Full recovery may take a decade or more.
Right now we are in a boom economy despite what various political factions want to say. Employment is high and if someone gets strapped there are second jobs available to make a little extra. We'll see the bubble burst when the economy shifts. We haven't seen anything yet.
We are now thinking about buying the condo and wait a year or so before attempting to sell the house to get maximum value.
Corporateburnout said:Do you think it will take 3 years for the RE market to get back to 2005 levels?
newguy888 said:many of those homes were taken off the market and have not sold. That has happened here in NJ.
SteveR said:Areas like Park City are going up even faster. The develpment there has been out of control and shows no stopping. Prices are still going up 10-15% a month in some favored areas there.
dex said:What I don't understand is: Where are all these people coming from?