As stated in other posts, I am a young officer in the USAF. The more I am in, the more I am looking at staying to try and reach 20 years (both because I enjoy the service and the obvious benefits).
I hear a lot of people on here talking about maxing the TSP and then going to ROTHs. I would like to at least be able to fully retire after 20-22 years. If I want to continue to work in the civilian side, so be it, if not, no worries. Doesn't investing in the TSP and IRA kind of tie your hands. If DW and I could amass a couple million $ over the course of a 20 year career, I would prefer for it to not be locked up until I am 59.5.
I am aware of the 72(t) however that still somewhat ties your hands. It restricts how much you can take out. I am considering investing in taxable accounts only and only creating taxable events such as buying and selling when absolutely necessary to reduce my tax burden. In the end, however, at age 42 or so, if my cards are played right, I could be fully retired living the FIRE life with a large lump sum of cash not tied up in a tax advantaged account that could be earning me tax free income from a t-bill.
I'd like to get the input from others since I feel like this idea goes against conventional wisdom I consistently hear on this forum. Is there something I'm missing, or is it just a choice? Most of us plan to retire before that 59.5 age so why use a vehicle made for those planning to retire at or after that age?
Thanks!
I hear a lot of people on here talking about maxing the TSP and then going to ROTHs. I would like to at least be able to fully retire after 20-22 years. If I want to continue to work in the civilian side, so be it, if not, no worries. Doesn't investing in the TSP and IRA kind of tie your hands. If DW and I could amass a couple million $ over the course of a 20 year career, I would prefer for it to not be locked up until I am 59.5.
I am aware of the 72(t) however that still somewhat ties your hands. It restricts how much you can take out. I am considering investing in taxable accounts only and only creating taxable events such as buying and selling when absolutely necessary to reduce my tax burden. In the end, however, at age 42 or so, if my cards are played right, I could be fully retired living the FIRE life with a large lump sum of cash not tied up in a tax advantaged account that could be earning me tax free income from a t-bill.
I'd like to get the input from others since I feel like this idea goes against conventional wisdom I consistently hear on this forum. Is there something I'm missing, or is it just a choice? Most of us plan to retire before that 59.5 age so why use a vehicle made for those planning to retire at or after that age?
Thanks!