I'm not sure this is political as much as social, but while reading the "too young to retire" thread, it came to mind again "Walden Two" (was that the name of the book I'm thinking of?) and the idea that as mechanization made work easier, people would not need to work as much. Ha! What is now here is a society in which the majority of people work jobs at a pace that is killing them, while at the same time a significant section of the population has no work at all. I understand that this gives benefits to investors (of which I am of course one) but seems to be a malignancy in society. Go into virtually any workplace, and you will see so many pale, unhappy looking people dragging themselves through work that, if they weren't doing it 70 hours each week, they might actually like.
The specter of medical care hangs over all of this--people could work less, with the work more equitably apportioned, if they weren't required to work like dogs to have medical care at all. For this, I have to say that the failure of the single-payer option seems tragic.
Okay, so shoot me, I'm a liberal.
The specter of medical care hangs over all of this--people could work less, with the work more equitably apportioned, if they weren't required to work like dogs to have medical care at all. For this, I have to say that the failure of the single-payer option seems tragic.
Okay, so shoot me, I'm a liberal.