MRG
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 11,078
I've always thought that schedule 2 controlled substances require you(or your delagate) to physically pick up the prescription at the DRs. office and take them to the pharmacy. I can understand that given the addictive nature of this class of meds.
I sometimes take a schedule 4 controlled substance and my DR. had just called in or electronically submitted the prescription. Yesterday I get a phone call from his nurse saying my prescription is ready and all prescriptions for any controlled substance, schedule 2-5 (this includes cough syrup with codeine), are now required to be picked up at the DRs. office and carried to the pharmacy. She said it was the group that owns the practice new policy.
Sure enough when I get there they have a new bigger file folder for controlled substance prescriptions. I have to give my id and sign that it's me that picked up the prescription. Then drive to the pharmacy to hand it to them. In the age of EMR and rising health care costs, this seems like a giant leap backwards, and a PIA.
I can ask my DR. what's the deal, but I know how much he dislikes the new group that runs the practice. I'm guessing the owner's think there's less liability for them somehow.
Is this the new age of reducing costs? Anybody had this happen?
I sometimes take a schedule 4 controlled substance and my DR. had just called in or electronically submitted the prescription. Yesterday I get a phone call from his nurse saying my prescription is ready and all prescriptions for any controlled substance, schedule 2-5 (this includes cough syrup with codeine), are now required to be picked up at the DRs. office and carried to the pharmacy. She said it was the group that owns the practice new policy.
Sure enough when I get there they have a new bigger file folder for controlled substance prescriptions. I have to give my id and sign that it's me that picked up the prescription. Then drive to the pharmacy to hand it to them. In the age of EMR and rising health care costs, this seems like a giant leap backwards, and a PIA.
I can ask my DR. what's the deal, but I know how much he dislikes the new group that runs the practice. I'm guessing the owner's think there's less liability for them somehow.
Is this the new age of reducing costs? Anybody had this happen?