I recently trialed Personal Capital as an alternative for consolidated views of our financial data, and I find it quite good. Thanks to the poster that led me there.
I have not bought into their advisory services, but I am curious if anyone has experience using their advisory services, or approach on their own. Their pitch proclaims that their method of sector re balancing has proven improved performance with lower risk than a straight S&P Indexed investment either ETF or Funds. They limit duration and maturity on the bond side to <5 years. Obviously at the cost of yield, but for a reduced interest rate risk.
Their data is compelling, leading to whether one should pay them their fee for maintaining the investments (re-balancing quite often to maintain a 10% per sector allocation), or consider trying to do so oneself.
Their advantage is in buying a large cross section of individual stocks and ETFs for small and foreign, rather than M funds, and managing the allocation to a type of index model in line with MPT.
First of all, it sounds more like they are acting as a mutual fund with an expense ratio of something like 0.8%, or similar to some account managers I have had in the past. They claim their approach is not stock picking, but using individual stocks, <200 seams to be more at risk than buying the S&P index but still enough to spread risk. Yet, their reduction in weighting on key sectors, and maintenance of allocation evenly across all sectors is their way of reducing market correlation risks. Example, my Health Care allocation is >17%, they would manage it to 10%, same with Tech and Financials, managed to 10% of US equity exposure. In the other view, they would increase small and mid cap allocations well beyond the overall market weighting within those sectors.
Does anyone have experience to support their data, net of fee, that they beat the S&P with a lower Std Deviation etc.? Its a bold statement that they support with data from 1990 on.
My current allocation is lagging due to the bond side duration, and I do not see this improving holding VWIAX and VWENX for a majority of my bond allocation. With a basic 60/40 split, my YTD is only 52% of the S&P due to the pull down in bonds.
I have not bought into their advisory services, but I am curious if anyone has experience using their advisory services, or approach on their own. Their pitch proclaims that their method of sector re balancing has proven improved performance with lower risk than a straight S&P Indexed investment either ETF or Funds. They limit duration and maturity on the bond side to <5 years. Obviously at the cost of yield, but for a reduced interest rate risk.
Their data is compelling, leading to whether one should pay them their fee for maintaining the investments (re-balancing quite often to maintain a 10% per sector allocation), or consider trying to do so oneself.
Their advantage is in buying a large cross section of individual stocks and ETFs for small and foreign, rather than M funds, and managing the allocation to a type of index model in line with MPT.
First of all, it sounds more like they are acting as a mutual fund with an expense ratio of something like 0.8%, or similar to some account managers I have had in the past. They claim their approach is not stock picking, but using individual stocks, <200 seams to be more at risk than buying the S&P index but still enough to spread risk. Yet, their reduction in weighting on key sectors, and maintenance of allocation evenly across all sectors is their way of reducing market correlation risks. Example, my Health Care allocation is >17%, they would manage it to 10%, same with Tech and Financials, managed to 10% of US equity exposure. In the other view, they would increase small and mid cap allocations well beyond the overall market weighting within those sectors.
Does anyone have experience to support their data, net of fee, that they beat the S&P with a lower Std Deviation etc.? Its a bold statement that they support with data from 1990 on.
My current allocation is lagging due to the bond side duration, and I do not see this improving holding VWIAX and VWENX for a majority of my bond allocation. With a basic 60/40 split, my YTD is only 52% of the S&P due to the pull down in bonds.