View Single Post
Old 06-29-2009, 10:33 PM   #65
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 5,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixonge View Post
I'll leave it to the market makers to arbitrage those things, I just put in a limit order for a price that meets my minimal demands and let the order fill as the prices move toward my position. I've gone 2-3 days working on that price before,...
I also do that often - but it is separate from what determines that price, which is the market's measure of the risk/reward of the position.
Quote:
Let me propose a theoretical trade scenario. For me to sell a July 780/790 bull put credit spread someone somewhere else has to be willing to *buy* a 780/790 put debit spread. (I think I have that right).
I'm not exactly certain of the mechanics of how it gets filled on the floor, but I always assumed they just fill your sale of the 790 put and your buy of the 780 put. So they just need to match each leg up with a buyer and a seller - not specifically another person looking for that complimentary spread (which I think would be a Bear Put Debit Spread, but I'd have to check).


Quote:
However, long before expiration day the other side could sell for a profit. Say they bought when the S&P was at 920 and it falls to 850. They sell, take their profit. In the meantime the S&P levels out and my spread expires worthless with the S&P at 840. I keep my credit, the other side keeps their profit. The market makers and brokers keep their money. I don't see where this requires a winner vs. a loser or a pro trader vs. a sucker.
You are mixing things up here. If the other side closed their complimentary spread position at a profit before expiration, then you need to compare them to a credit spread position that was opened/closed at the same time, and that would be closed at a loss - netting zero (disregarding spread/comm/fees). The position you hold to expiration can only be compared to it's complimentary spread held to expiration. If you had a gain, they had a loss.

Quote:
This reminds me of when I first started exploring options. Most of the textbook explanations seem to assume that one will always hold an option to expiration....
Sure, the books usually deal with expiration to make it clear how these things work. You can close earlier to lock in a profit or limit a loss, but.... at that point you are guessing on the future moves of the market. Locking in a gain means giving up some of the total gain you might have if held to expiry (but relieving you of further risk of loss). Limiting a loss means you give up on the chance that the position returns to profitability at expiration, which it might do.

It becomes market timing - good luck!

Quote:
FYI, I'm quite enjoying this discussion btw. If I can't somewhat defend my strategy in the public forum I'd have no business doing it, right?
That's the same reason I'm engaging in it from my end. It's been a while since I talked myself through these - good to challenge my thinking and make sure I don't get stale!


-ERD50
ERD50 is offline   Reply With Quote