|
04-17-2014, 06:02 AM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
|
Wash sale rule
I know you can not sell at a lost, then buy back in less than 30 days, then report the loss.
But what if you buy more first (say in a IRA), then sell the same security in your taxable account the next day?
In other words, does the 30 day window extend backward in time, so really it's a 60 day window?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-17-2014, 06:06 AM
|
#2
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 40,714
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans
In other words, does the 30 day window extend backward in time, so really it's a 60 day window?
|
Sorry, the 30 day window extends both ways.
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 06:15 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelB
Sorry, the 30 day window extends both ways.
|
So why don't we call it a 60 day window? Oh wait this is tax law, never mind.
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 06:28 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,023
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by teejayevans
I know you can not sell at a lost, then buy back in less than 30 days, then report the loss.
But what if you buy more first (say in a IRA), then sell the same security in your taxable account the next day?
In other words, does the 30 day window extend backward in time, so really it's a 60 day window?
|
DANGER!
Do NOT buy the same security in an IRA that you sold for a loss in your taxable account. You lose the tax deduction FOREVER...gone, poof!
You need to be very careful with this. Either wait 31 days before taking the loss in taxable after buying in the IRA or wait 31 days to buy in the IRA after taking the loss in taxable.
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 06:32 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fermion
DANGER!
Do NOT buy the same security in an IRA that you sold for a loss in your taxable account. You lose the tax deduction FOREVER...gone, poof!
You need to be very careful with this. Either wait 31 days before taking the loss in taxable after buying in the IRA or wait 31 days to buy in the IRA after taking the loss in taxable.
|
Thanks, glad I asked
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 06:54 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,894
|
Fairmark has a pretty good page on wash sales
The Wash Sale Rule
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 11:21 AM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 26,889
|
I do understand that transactions in an IRA affect the wash sale rule for your taxable account. But as a practical matter, would the IRS ever detect this? Not that I'm suggesting that anyone test this, but really, how would they find out?
Even in an audit, unless it was a full-blown check every line and research everything for every account, how would it ever come to light? That would be a lot of resources to throw at what is probably a pretty average looking tax return. And would there be a statute of limitations? How long do I need to keep my IRA transactions, since they aren't even reported on my tax forms?
If I realized after-the-fact that I did this, I think I'd let it slide and take my chances, and make sure I never did it again. Even if it was detected, I think the penalties might be easier to take than the work to correct it, even if there was a single digit chance of them catching it, and I think the chances are slight indeed. Unless someone has evidence to the contrary.
-ERD50
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 12:27 PM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 35,712
|
The wash sale rule is indeed difficult to enforce. The law said one could not buy the same equity or a "substantially identical" one. That latter is not well defined. In a sector or industry, there are often several stocks that move in unison. Similarly, there are several MFs or ETFs that move together. So, it is not a clear-cut criterion.
My guess is that unless the buy/sell orders are in the millions of dollars, the IRS does not care to check it. This does not mean one should intentionally violate the law, of course.
__________________
"Old age is the most unexpected of all things that happen to a man" -- Leon Trotsky (1879-1940)
"Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities Can Make You Commit Atrocities" - Voltaire (1694-1778)
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 12:32 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,369
|
I agree that the likelihood of detection is very low. But if they found it and believed it was done intentionally, it is likely they would prosecute to the full extent of the law to set an example. I would not want to be on the end of that stick.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 03:55 PM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,328
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NW-Bound
The wash sale rule is indeed difficult to enforce. The law said one could not buy the same equity or a "substantially identical" one. That latter is not well defined. In a sector or industry, there are often several stocks that move in unison. Similarly, there are several MFs or ETFs that move together. So, it is not a clear-cut criterion.
My guess is that unless the buy/sell orders are in the millions of dollars, the IRS does not care to check it. This does not mean one should intentionally violate the law, of course.
|
I agree. I recall a thread at Bogleheads where they were wringing their hands over selling a Vanguard S&P 500 fund and buying some replacement Vanguard funds that approximate the S&P 500 (or something similar). Of course the FUD mongers were predicting the IRS would swoop down and send the guy to prison for a wash sale.
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#11
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,691
|
I guess they don't ask VG, FIDO, etc to police it and report it, surely they would know IF done under their watch, no way if done across brokerages
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 04:42 PM
|
#12
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Treasure Coast
Posts: 472
|
Wash sale rules are extremely difficult to interpret/enforce. Even many brokerage firms get the basics wrong. I had a corrected 1099 this year that was issued to mark a transaction as a wash sale. It was an error. After pointing this out, and a few other errors that existed in the original 1099, I finally received a correct corrected 1099. This from a very large and well-known full service firm.
|
|
|
04-17-2014, 10:12 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17,239
|
I think there is some case law on this and FWIR, it has to be VERY close to get you caught... IOW, buying another company will not trigger it even if they track each other closely....
I do think that buying the S&P 500 from a different company would...
As mentioned, if done across brokers I do not think anybody would ever find it... I bet that even in the same broker they might not... there is no requirement to keep track of basis in an IRA... (as far as I know)....
Funny thing is that if you have a bond fund, you will always have this problem if you reinvest... they are buying new shares at the end of every month.... I was having this happen to me... the loss kept getting bigger and bigger...
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:22 AM
|
#14
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,369
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Proud
I think there is some case law on this and FWIR, it has to be VERY close to get you caught... IOW, buying another company will not trigger it even if they track each other closely....
I do think that buying the S&P 500 from a different company would...
As mentioned, if done across brokers I do not think anybody would ever find it... I bet that even in the same broker they might not... there is no requirement to keep track of basis in an IRA... (as far as I know)....
Funny thing is that if you have a bond fund, you will always have this problem if you reinvest... they are buying new shares at the end of every month.... I was having this happen to me... the loss kept getting bigger and bigger...
|
+1 to first three. I hadn't thought of the reinvested dividend complication causing a wash sale. Yuk!!!
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|