Montecfo
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I think you misunderstood what I said. It is simply a risk-reward analysis I did at the time.Opportunity cost, huh? If someone convinces themselves that every last dollar they have invested must be in the absolute top yielding or fastest growing asset, we know they are setting themselves up for a wild ride. Most people don’t choose to do that. So once you back off from maximizing long term return overriding every other consideration, you can’t sweat the opportunity cost so much.
I honestly don’t worry about only getting 2.3% to 2.5% on my short term cash type investments compared to longer term or lower credit quality bonds or equities.
I have so much invested in equities that I feel I can “afford” to have plenty of conservative investments as well.
I am not 100% stocks at present. But there was a time in my accumulation stage when I was. And it made financial sense compared to keeping a large low-return emergency fund, in my opinion. Insurance is not free.
But people can assess the risks and decide differently. I am ok with that.
I also have heard people insist on keeping an emergency fund while maintaining credit card debt they could use their emergency fund to pay off. These good ideas (emergency fund) can be taken too far in my view.
I certainly have never "convinced myself" to only invest in the fastest growing assets as you suggest.