Lakewood90712
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 2,223
The speakers words that got me (paraphrase) :
" At the end of your life, what would you pay to get those hours spent working back "
Early in my career, a close friend left his "serious", "professional" j*b in the nation's capital and instead took a job as a waiter at an upscale hotel in Bermuda. It paid much less, but he was young, single and healthy so he didn't need much. He earned enough to rent a small apartment and stock the fridge with beer. Most of his meals were comped, and he could walk or moped anywhere he needed to go on the island.
He may have been only waiting tables, but he was waiting tables in a tropical paradise. And loving it.
I, by comparison, was trudging along on the corporate treadmill and struggling to provide for a wife and growing family. Despite some envy at my buddy's freedom and easy lifestyle, I thought it unsustainable. So I asked him, "It may be all beaches and cream now when you're 25, but you're not building any security for the future. What will you do when you're 50?"
He smiled and said "I'll be a waiter in paradise. And loving it." It blew my mind, and proved to be a invaluable lesson about stretching one's paradigms.
As living on a boat, I only did that for three months. I'm seriously considering some longer cruises, but haven't made the leap to full-time live-aboard yet.
Up to a point I see his point......
As part of my LBYM thinking I often asked myself before a purchase - Would I rather have an extra NN hours to do as I please or would I rather have this thing?
OTOH, he glosses over the fact that during our working years we are not working all our waking hours. His example assumes we do nothing but sleep and work for 45 years. Yet most of us have time during those years to spend with friends, read a book, take a walk in the park, spend a day at a museum, travel etc. etc. etc.
Still, I agree with the premise that pursuing material goods takes a lot of our very valuable time.