First Post - Financial plan sanity check

\Again on SPIA's - you looked, you considered, you made a decision, based upon current "factors". Those previous factors have now changed, and you changed your direction. No problem with that, IMHO.

Thanks - - I think a lot of ER forum members MEAN that each person has a different situation and should weigh the pros and cons, but they don't always say that because they see that for themselves, and so many others (especially our younger members), a fixed lifetime annuity wouldn't work. (Or, they see the inexperienced being taken advantage of with variable annuities - - some people lump these together, when they are really very different products.) So, a lot of ER forum members seem to diss annuities a bit.

In my opinion fixed lifetime annuities are an option that bears consideraton. Even if they they are not appropriate at the present time for many/most of us, circumstances change and some day an annuity might be perfectly appropriate.

(I know, you guys, I know, "or pigs may fly" :2funny:)

I will definitely revisit the idea, since it is my nature to check and double-check my financial plan from time to time. I might get one in my 70's, or ideally around 85 if the idea of more money fires me up at that age.
 
Last edited:
Heard on the radio (must be true) that some insurers are not charging enough in fees to stockpile for the upcoming, long-lived boomers collecting their payouts til age 90.

Personally I am not so sure that we will live quite as long as "they" say. My guess is that we'll live a year or two longer, but hopefully with better quality of life in the final years, followed by a rapid decline and demise. If my guess is right, it could be worse.
 
Heard on the radio (must be true) that some insurers are not charging enough in fees to stockpile for the upcoming, long-lived boomers collecting their payouts til age 90.

Personally I am not so sure that we will live quite as long as "they" say. My guess is that we'll live a year or two longer, but hopefully with better quality of life in the final years, followed by a rapid decline and demise. If my guess is right, it could be worse.

That is so true!! Probably it could be worse, but I guess we will find out as the years pass. At least, some of us will. :2funny:

The other thing is, who's to say that the next industry to experience mass failures and failure to meet shareholders' and other obligaions might not by the insurance industry? I can see it now - - huge government bail-outs for every insurance company except the one that holds my annuity, which goes bankrupt with the executives departing with multi-bazillion dollar parachutes and annuities paid at pennies on the dollar... (shudder). I would feel that less likely if my planned ER was for only 10 years, rather than 35 years or so which is my present timeframe.
 
Thanks - - I think a lot of ER forum members MEAN that each person has a different situation and should weigh the pros and cons, but they don't always say that because they see that for themselves

Meaning "the filters of their own lives". Yes, unless you understand that concept, you may not be "comfortable" with other peoples concepts/decisons.

- Ron
 
I can see it now - - huge government bail-outs for every insurance company except the one that holds my annuity,

Most states have an insurance guaranty fund that insurance/annuity companies pay into, but seldom tell you about. Your state department of insurance will have all of the details.
 
I wouldn't go so far as saying everyone here hates annuities, but many of us think there are much better ways to manage your retirement funds.

As to what makes sense, that varies greatly by individual. When it comes to annuities, zero is the right number for me but that isn't the case for everyone. I suggest a balanced, diversified approach and would strongly advise against placing a large chunk of your nest egg in any one basket.

For Gary K,

If you do go with an annuity, be very careful about expenses. Most annuities have ridiculously high ones. Look at TIAA-CREF, Vanguard and Fidelity (where you would buy them directly rather than though a highly compensated salesperson.)

The following web site was started by some teachers who were getting screwed over because their 403B plans were tied up in annuities. I recall that it had an awful lot of good annuity info (they even published a study I put together to try to convince my daughter's employer to use TIAA-CREF rather than the provider they had). Even though it's primarily focused on public-employee 403B plans, it had a lot of good annuity info. (I haven't visited it for ages).
 
The following web site was started by some teachers who were getting screwed over because their 403B plans were tied up in annuities. I recall that it had an awful lot of good annuity info (they even published a study I put together to try to convince my daughter's employer to use TIAA-CREF rather than the provider they had). Even though it's primarily focused on public-employee 403B plans, it had a lot of good annuity info. (I haven't visited it for ages).

Here's another good site, IMHO on the subject of SPIA's:

Immediate Annuities in Retirement

Bob has done a good job in putting together a lot of the pro/con's this subject is sure to generate and let's you look at the option to see if it fits your "future needs".

- Ron
 
For Gary K,



The following web site was started by some teachers who were getting screwed over because their 403B plans were tied up in annuities. I recall that it had an awful lot of good annuity info (they even published a study I put together to try to convince my daughter's employer to use TIAA-CREF rather than the provider they had). Even though it's primarily focused on public-employee 403B plans, it had a lot of good annuity info. (I haven't visited it for ages).

That site, which I left out of my earlier post, is 403(b)wise . The Leading Source of 403(b) Information on the Web
 
Back
Top Bottom