|
Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 10:43 AM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
|
Hi! a newbie with a twist
Hi All - Jonathan Clements came through for me again with advice to check out E-R.org and FIREcalc. Wonderful to find you all.
I am a 52 year old woman in a civil union with another woman age 61. Our legal relationship is only helpful to us in the state of Vermont. The feds don't recognize us at all. My partner is coming up on her 62nd birthday and we're thinking about whether or not to begin collecting those (reduced) SS checks and investing them. She is currently working part time and earning a little under $12K a year. We have 4 grown children (hers biologically) and 3 grandchildren. Her health is very good, but her parents both died fairly young - dad at 70, mom at 74. We're thinking it would be a good idea to begin collecting earlier rather than later, since there would be no beneficiary payments on her SS account if she died prematurely. So long as she keeps earning under the SS maximum, to avoid taxes on the SS money, do you think it would be a good idea for us to collect and invest? One other question I haven't looked into yet, once collecting SS can an individual still contribute to an IRA, or is that option closed off? (I've been funding her IRA for years, and since my good options 401(k), HSA, non-deductible IRA are already maxed out, I'd like to continue to protect $ in her Roth IRA.)
LEM1955
__________________
"Retirement isn’t really a switch you flip at a certain age anymore," the Schwab report states. "It’s a financial state that allows for the flexibility to make work optional."
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 11:08 AM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boise
Posts: 7,865
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Welcome to the board!
Your first question is interesting but I don't have a good answer for you there. I think the "take SS early" question is primarily driven by life expectancy, whether or not you need the funds, and how you would invest them. There is a calculator on the SS site that will tell you when your "breakeven" point is if you start collecting SS early, on time, or late. However, it doesn't take into account any earnings you would make on the SS money if you took it early and invested in or saved it:
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/quickcalc/when2retire.html
I will point out that in the SS benefit calculations age is calculated on a monthly basis, so your spouse's benefit amount will increase slightly each month beyond age 62. It isn't an "either/or" proposition between 62 and 65.
You can still contribute to either a Roth or Traditional IRA even when collecting SS as long as you meet the other requirements. For example, she would be able to contribute to her Roth IRA as long as she had enough earned income to do so and didn't make "too much" for her filing status. Her SS benefits and your income would not be considered earned income for the purposes of determining her contribution eligibility. However, the contribution could come from your income or assets.
2Cor521
Edit: I stand corrected on my last paragraph above. It makes sense though; because you have to start RMD's at 70.5 from the traditional IRA.
__________________
"At times the world can seem an unfriendly and sinister place, but believe us when we say there is much more good in it than bad. All you have to do is look hard enough, and what might seem to be a series of unfortunate events, may in fact be the first steps of a journey." Violet Baudelaire.
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 11:57 AM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Hello LEM1955,
Yes, you do have an interesting twist.
Normally (pending particular details), a common plan is to withdraw money from your IRA from age 62-70, then take SS at age 70, in order to minimize the size of the RMD from the IRA, as well as to increase your SS payment, and maximize any spousal benefit SS payment.
However, in your case, assuming that her earnings plus SS income keeps her under the limit of the special working SS tax, I would say it sounds like a good move.
To answer your question on IRA contributions (which I had never though to look up until now, and which surprised me a bit on the age limit), here's what the IRS says about contributing to an IRA:
"Age 70½ rule. Contributions cannot be made to your traditional IRA for the year in which you reach age 70½ or for any later year.
You attain age 70½ on the date that is six calendar months after the 70th anniversary of your birth. If you were born on June 30, 1935, the 70th anniversary of your birth is June 30, 2005, and you attained age 70½ on December 30, 2005. If you were born on July 1, 1935, the 70th anniversary of your birth was July 1, 2005, and you attained age 70½ on January 1, 2006."
source: http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch01.html
I scrolled through the IRA document listed above, and as far as I can tell, it doesn't matter if you are collecting SS or not - the only requirement is that your IRA contribution cannot be greater than your total wage earnings for that year, up to $4,000 (plus the over-50 catchup contribution).
Note that the value of her IRA deduction (if contributing to a Traditional IRA) may be limited, based on her wage income, her SS income, and whether she was covered by a retirement plan at work.
__________________
Dryer sheets Schmyer sheets
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 12:06 PM
|
#4
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 673
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
There are lots of threads on delaying social security - use the search function and read some, I think you will find lots of interesting info.
I believe that as long as the two of you are in good health that this is a prime example of when ss should be delayed - since women have longer life expectancies. I realize that the "risk" of not taking it looks big now, the real risk is 2 women living to 100 and outliving their money.
Anyway, Welcome to the board!
__________________
I'm made of atoms, you're made of atoms, and we're all in this together. Ben Lee
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 12:55 PM
|
#5
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Thanks for your responses. I think "search" will keep me busy here a long time. Just to clarify my situation a little more. I'm still working and we have no need to draw on either SS or invested money of any kind. (Current plan is ER in 5.5 years.) It's that no spousal benefit thing I keep trying to weigh against the two of us living 100 years thing. We just celebrated my paternal grandmother's 100th birthday at the beginning of February. So 110 for me, isn't out of the question. OMG, maybe I should work longer....
__________________
"Retirement isn’t really a switch you flip at a certain age anymore," the Schwab report states. "It’s a financial state that allows for the flexibility to make work optional."
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 01:12 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
You might want to look at this thread and the thread Cutthroat linked to in that thread:
http://early-retirement.org/forums/i...?topic=11795.0
__________________
.
No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 01:51 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11,401
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by lem1955
Thanks for your responses. I think "search" will keep me busy here a long time. Just to clarify my situation a little more. I'm still working and we have no need to draw on either SS or invested money of any kind. (Current plan is ER in 5.5 years.) It's that no spousal benefit thing I keep trying to weigh against the two of us living 100 years thing. We just celebrated my paternal grandmother's 100th birthday at the beginning of February. So 110 for me, isn't out of the question. OMG, maybe I should work longer....
|
Or move?
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 03:30 PM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by lem1955
Thanks for your responses. I think "search" will keep me busy here a long time. Just to clarify my situation a little more. I'm still working and we have no need to draw on either SS or invested money of any kind. (Current plan is ER in 5.5 years.) It's that no spousal benefit thing I keep trying to weigh against the two of us living 100 years thing. We just celebrated my paternal grandmother's 100th birthday at the beginning of February. So 110 for me, isn't out of the question. OMG, maybe I should work longer....
|
Well, if longevity is in your family's history, and you don't need to draw SS, then waiting until age 70 to max out SS would probably be a good idea.
If you don't need to draw on invested money or SS, then why are you still working?
What were the causes of death of the father/mother at 70/74? You could always have the lower-valued benefit SS take it before age 65, and have the higher SS benefit taken at age 70, since the penalty $-wise of taking the lower SS early wouldn't be as much as the gain in delaying the higher SS benefit until 70.
__________________
Dryer sheets Schmyer sheets
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 03:53 PM
|
#9
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,105
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
I thought this topic was going to be a new alcoholic drink!
__________________
Sometimes death is not as tragic as not knowing how to live. This man knew how to live--and how to make others glad they were living. - Jack Benny at Nat King Cole's funeral
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 03:56 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Hi and welcome. I'm generally against annuities in any form or fashion but the US government stuck us in one and the question is how to maximize your money out. If you health is bad, take it right away. If your health is good, delay as long as you can afford to. SS goes up about 8.5% plus COLA for every year delayed until age 70. There isn't any "safe" place to invest your money that will give you that kind of return.
Even if her parents and grandparents died in their 60's, I recommend she look at her own health to make the decision. Both of my parents smoked heavily -- my mother died of lung cancer (65) and an abdominal cancer/tumor killed my father (79). Three out of four grandparents made it to 85. You don't know what will happen until you get something serious.
Things might change if the legal union was treated like marriage for SS purposes. Then there are more financial jumbles to consider that don't matter for either of you.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-02-2007, 03:58 PM
|
#11
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lawn chair in Texas
Posts: 14,183
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by dex
I thought this topic was going to be a new alcoholic drink!
|
2 shots Wild Turkey
Ice
Done!
__________________
Have Funds, Will Retire
...not doing anything of true substance...
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-03-2007, 06:50 AM
|
#12
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by MooreBonds
If you don't need to draw on invested money or SS, then why are you still working?
|
We WILL need to draw on SS and invested money, but not until I stop working. We're just regular middle class types trying to put it all together.
Thanks for all your responses. And for those of you who were mislead by my subject heading, try this:
The Mary Pickford:
1 1/2 oz white rum
1 1/2 oz pineapple juice
1/4 oz grenadine
1/4 oz maraschino liqueur
Shake w/ice and strain into a cocktail glass. Add a twist, if desired!
__________________
"Retirement isn’t really a switch you flip at a certain age anymore," the Schwab report states. "It’s a financial state that allows for the flexibility to make work optional."
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-03-2007, 09:13 AM
|
#13
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,337
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by lem1955
We WILL need to draw on SS and invested money, but not until I stop working. We're just regular middle class types trying to put it all together.
|
Here's another couple of twists.
Your partner with biological children probably has an ex-husband in the woodpile (living or dead). If so, she probably has some spousal rights to his social security. She is eligible for either her SS or half of his depending on which is greater. It's worth checking out and seeing if there is any benefits there.
Tax wise you win by the feds not recognizing your union. She can start taking SS whenever she wants and your income won't count against it by raising your joint return taxes. The normal rules apply if she is working and starts taking SS.
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane -- Marcus Aurelius
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-03-2007, 02:45 PM
|
#14
|
Gone but not forgotten
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota,fl.
Posts: 11,447
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Plus if your partner's ex has died she can start collecting a portion of his SS benefits now and let hers grow till 70.
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-04-2007, 07:42 AM
|
#15
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2B
Here's another couple of twists.
Your partner with biological children probably has an ex-husband in the woodpile (living or dead). If so, she probably has some spousal rights to his social security. She is eligible for either her SS or half of his depending on which is greater. It's worth checking out and seeing if there is any benefits there.
|
Yup, she does. He's still living and remarried many years ago. Is my partner still entitled to half his SS benefit, despite his remarriage? Does he have to be cooperative, or can she apply without his knowledge or cooperation?
__________________
"Retirement isn’t really a switch you flip at a certain age anymore," the Schwab report states. "It’s a financial state that allows for the flexibility to make work optional."
|
|
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
03-04-2007, 07:51 AM
|
#16
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 315
|
Re: Hi! a newbie with a twist
Quote:
Originally Posted by lem1955
Yup, she does. He's still living and remarried many years ago. Is my partner still entitled to half his SS benefit, despite his remarriage? Does he have to be cooperative, or can she apply without his knowledge or cooperation?
|
Actually, just found my own answer --- she would have to have been married at least 10 years, and it was only 7 years. (She'd say "only?". It was an eternity, and not the good kind.) Oh well, collecting on his spousal benefits would have been sweet justice, if it had worked for her. Thanks for the tip, anyway.
__________________
"Retirement isn’t really a switch you flip at a certain age anymore," the Schwab report states. "It’s a financial state that allows for the flexibility to make work optional."
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|