Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Hi From Waxhaw, N.C. Looking for Advice on Dividend Investments
Old 07-28-2022, 07:30 PM   #1
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Hi From Waxhaw, N.C. Looking for Advice on Dividend Investments

Hey there. I have been reading this newsletter for several years now, but have never really asked any questions nor answered any as I do not consider myself knowledgeable enough.
I am 48 years old and was hoping to retire at 55 if possible. I have investments totaling 1.1 million which consists of 90% stocks and 10% bonds. The stocks are mostly index funds. I chose Vanguard because of their low fees.
I recently have read some things talking about buying stocks that produce dividends to create an income stream in retirement without having to sell off funds. From what I have seen, most dividends are in the range of 2-4%, which wouldn't seem to create a high enough income stream unless I had 3-4 million saved. It also seems that anything offering a higher dividend doesn't historically offer a great return otherwise, so it seems I would sacrifice long-term gains for a dividend, but I could be completely wrong.
I guess I was wondering if at this point it is too late to hope to generate a large dividend income by age 55 or even 60. The reason I started thinking about this is because I didn't want to have to sell off my investments when I retire, but try to leave it to grow and pass onto my children if possible.
To give a little more information, I am able to save between $40-50K a year and was wondering if moving forward it would be wise to only invest in dividend producing investments in order to have a decent income stream when I retire.
Any advice is welcomed and feel free to ask for any additional information. I'm a newbie
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 07-28-2022, 07:36 PM   #2
Full time employment: Posting here.
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 860
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennyandgragg1 View Post
From what I have seen, most dividends are in the range of 2-4%, which wouldn't seem to create a high enough income stream unless I had 3-4 million saved. It also seems that anything offering a higher dividend doesn't historically offer a great return otherwise, so it seems I would sacrifice long-term gains for a dividend....
Give yourself credit for "seeing and seeming" well!

Selling some shares in retirement is very common, and is assumed to occur in the discussion of Safe withdrawal rates.
SevenUp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 03:50 AM   #3
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hartford
Posts: 358
Hi Lenny,

Kudos to you for living below your means and planning ahead!

Let me tell you what we are doing. It's not necessarily the best but it lets us sleep at night.

We broke our portfolio into two buckets. On is an equity bucket that mirrors the S&P 500 approx. The other is an income producing bucket.

We plan to live off part of the income from the income bucket and leave the equity bucket for our kids. We also will reinvest a portion of the income back into the income bucket so it grows at the inflation rate. (Probably can't grow at 8% but we hope the inflation rate will come down in the future......)

In the income bucket we have some bonds, some private placement debt, and some income producing equity funds. Right now these are JEPI and DIVO.

Because of the income bucket our portfolio volatility - and growth potential - is less than an S&P index fund. But our income is more or less predictable so we are comforted by this when the market goes down.

It's also possible to create income by selling covered calls and other options. We don't do that but there's lots of info on the Active Investors thread about this. JEPI has people who do this but we pay a .35% expense ratio for them to manage it rather than us.

If you study income producing investments you will find a variety of instruments with higher interest rates than standard dividend mutual funds. Each comes with it's own risk....

Your post and questions are good ones and you will get lots of info from this group.
ImThinkin2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 04:26 AM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennyandgragg1 View Post
... From what I have seen, most dividends are in the range of 2-4%, which wouldn't seem to create a high enough income stream unless I had 3-4 million saved. It also seems that anything offering a higher dividend doesn't historically offer a great return otherwise, so it seems I would sacrifice long-term gains for a dividend...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SevenUp View Post
Give yourself credit for "seeing and seeming" well!

Selling some shares in retirement is very common, and is assumed to occur in the discussion of Safe withdrawal rates.
+1 Welcome lennyandgragg1. You seem to well understand the fallacy of the high dividend stocks... that dividend money has to come from somewhere and when dividends are paid they result in a 1:1 reduction in the share price so the value of your holdings go down so it isn't any different from having sold shares to get that money. Or think of it another way... let's say that in the long run that your stocks return 7% with 5% being price appreciation and 2% dividends and that you have a 4% withdrawal rate... on average your portfolio will still grow by 3% annually...the 7% growth less the 4% withdrawal and that 3% annual growth would occur if the stocks had 7% return with 6% price appreciation and 1% dividends or 7% return with 7% price appreciation and 0% dividends. Now to be clear, there will be years where total return is less than 4% (like 2022) so 4% withdrawals will cause a further decline and years where total return is more than 7% so portfolio growth will be more than 3% after 4% withdrawals.

In fact, for most periods, a broad based portfolio will outperform a dividend focused portfolio... play around comparing a $1 million portfolio with $40,000 annual withdrawals adjusted for inflation between VTSMX (Total Stock) and VDIGX (Dividend Growth) in Portfolio Visualizer... for most 20 year periods VTSMX comes out ahead. So in a nutshell, think total return and don't fret about dividends.

You may also find this paper from Vanguard on the subject interesting. https://investor.vanguard.com/invest...come-investors

Quote:
In the current low-yield environment, income-oriented investors may be tempted to search for higher-yielding assets to support their spending requirements. However, according to a recently updated paper by Vanguard Investment Strategy Group (ISG), Total Return Investing: A Smart Response to Shrinking Yields, many investors seeking income would be better served if they adopted a total return strategy that spends through capital returns in addition to portfolio income yield. ...
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 06:28 AM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Midpack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 21,204
^^^ Outstanding post!
__________________
No one agrees with other people's opinions; they merely agree with their own opinions -- expressed by somebody else. Sydney Tremayne
Retired Jun 2011 at age 57

Target AA: 50% equity funds / 45% bonds / 5% cash
Target WR: Approx 1.5% Approx 20% SI (secure income, SS only)
Midpack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 06:54 AM   #6
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
^^^ Outstanding post!
+1
finnski1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 08:16 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
... In fact, for most periods, a broad based portfolio will outperform a dividend focused portfolio. ...
@lennyandgragg1, an easy to understand explanation for this is that by selecting for dividends you are selecting for older less dynamic companies and companies who don't feel that they have good internal growth opportunities for investments. Another factor, especially recently, is the trend away from dividends and towards stock buybacks. By selecting for dividends, one eliminates companies who are choosing to return money to shareholders via buybacks. (Lots of debate on that practice, but out of scope for this thread.)

Here's a pretty good video on the subject: Dr. Kenneth French on Dividends: https://famafrench.dimensional.com/v...dividends.aspx
__________________
Ignoramus et ignorabimus
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 03:45 PM   #8
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by SevenUp View Post
Give yourself credit for "seeing and seeming" well!

Selling some shares in retirement is very common, and is assumed to occur in the discussion of Safe withdrawal rates.
I appreciate it.
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 03:46 PM   #9
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Thanks.
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 04:09 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Dash man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Limerick
Posts: 5,638
Vanguard has a very good dividend appreciation ETF symbol VIG. In the comparison below with VUG, their growth ETF, you’ll notice year to date and over the past years, VIG didn’t go down as much as VUG, even though over five years VUG did better. VIG invests in companies whose dividends grow each year, for extended periods of time, usually at least 25 years. If you invest for dividends that’s the kind of companies you want. Chasing high dividends can be dangerous. Dividend growing companies will be less volatile than pure growth stocks.

IMG_4218.jpg
Dash man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:44 PM   #11
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Thank you.
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 09:55 PM   #12
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Great article. Thanks for sharing.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
+1 Welcome lennyandgragg1. You seem to well understand the fallacy of the high dividend stocks... that dividend money has to come from somewhere and when dividends are paid they result in a 1:1 reduction in the share price so the value of your holdings go down so it isn't any different from having sold shares to get that money. Or think of it another way... let's say that in the long run that your stocks return 7% with 5% being price appreciation and 2% dividends and that you have a 4% withdrawal rate... on average your portfolio will still grow by 3% annually...the 7% growth less the 4% withdrawal and that 3% annual growth would occur if the stocks had 7% return with 6% price appreciation and 1% dividends or 7% return with 7% price appreciation and 0% dividends. Now to be clear, there will be years where total return is less than 4% (like 2022) so 4% withdrawals will cause a further decline and years where total return is more than 7% so portfolio growth will be more than 3% after 4% withdrawals.

In fact, for most periods, a broad based portfolio will outperform a dividend focused portfolio... play around comparing a $1 million portfolio with $40,000 annual withdrawals adjusted for inflation between VTSMX (Total Stock) and VDIGX (Dividend Growth) in Portfolio Visualizer... for most 20 year periods VTSMX comes out ahead. So in a nutshell, think total return and don't fret about dividends.

You may also find this paper from Vanguard on the subject interesting. https://investor.vanguard.com/invest...come-investors
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2022, 10:11 PM   #13
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
@Old Shooter....Great interview. It explained things very clearly. Is there an ideal situation where one could get the best of both worlds with dividends capital gains or does the stock price usually go down if one is given a dividend?



Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
@lennyandgragg1, an easy to understand explanation for this is that by selecting for dividends you are selecting for older less dynamic companies and companies who don't feel that they have good internal growth opportunities for investments. Another factor, especially recently, is the trend away from dividends and towards stock buybacks. By selecting for dividends, one eliminates companies who are choosing to return money to shareholders via buybacks. (Lots of debate on that practice, but out of scope for this thread.)

Here's a pretty good video on the subject: Dr. Kenneth French on Dividends: https://famafrench.dimensional.com/v...dividends.aspx
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 09:13 AM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
target2019's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: On a hill in the Pine Barrens
Posts: 9,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennyandgragg1 View Post
Hey there. I have been reading this newsletter for several years now, but have never really asked any questions nor answered any as I do not consider myself knowledgeable enough.
I am 48 years old and was hoping to retire at 55 if possible. I have investments totaling 1.1 million which consists of 90% stocks and 10% bonds. The stocks are mostly index funds. I chose Vanguard because of their low fees.
I recently have read some things talking about buying stocks that produce dividends to create an income stream in retirement without having to sell off funds. From what I have seen, most dividends are in the range of 2-4%, which wouldn't seem to create a high enough income stream unless I had 3-4 million saved. It also seems that anything offering a higher dividend doesn't historically offer a great return otherwise, so it seems I would sacrifice long-term gains for a dividend, but I could be completely wrong.
I guess I was wondering if at this point it is too late to hope to generate a large dividend income by age 55 or even 60. The reason I started thinking about this is because I didn't want to have to sell off my investments when I retire, but try to leave it to grow and pass onto my children if possible.
To give a little more information, I am able to save between $40-50K a year and was wondering if moving forward it would be wise to only invest in dividend producing investments in order to have a decent income stream when I retire.
Any advice is welcomed and feel free to ask for any additional information. I'm a newbie
We use the ETF from Schwab with a ticker of SCHD (D for dividends) for automatic distribution of dividends each quarter. So a portion of our portfolio is invested that way, rather than buying individual company stocks. However, when you mention growth and passing some to your children, this suggests SCHG (Growth).

That explains the two main components of the broad U.S. stock market (SCHB). In order to make a reasonable judgment, it's most important to understand these components and what happens over time with risk levels.
target2019 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 10:43 AM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennyandgragg1 View Post
@Old Shooter....Great interview. It explained things very clearly. Is there an ideal situation where one could get the best of both worlds with dividends capital gains or does the stock price usually go down if one is given a dividend?
Sadly, there is no free lunch out there, though we've all hoped to find one.

From a logical POV, consider a reductio ad absurdum example: A company that had no business and whose only asset was $1K in cash, which had issued only one share of stock, and the stock price was $1K. OK? Now consider what happens to the stock price after it distributes that $1K to its shareholder. It has to go to zero because there is no more value in the company. The shareholder is fine; he has the same portfolio value as before. But no speculator is likely bid the stock price above zero.

Another way to analyze the hypothesis is to observe that if your idea worked, it would be the equivalent of a free lunch. Free lunches have very short lives in the market. As soon as they are noticed they are arbitraged away. With well over 10,000 funds and institutions watching maybe 6,000 US stocks, any free lunches get noticed very quickly.

That said, beginning the day after a dividend is paid, the employees of any company will still be working away to add value, so one can expect that the stock price will rise appropriately. But that dividend money is gone from the company forever; simple arithmetic tells you that the value of the company must have been reduced accordingly.

None of this says that a dividend strategy is a bad one for any particular individual. Dr. French's idea of it being a forced spending curb might be just the right thing for some. But a dividend strategy is demonstrably not financially optimum for a long term investor. Stock prices are "noisy" in a statistical sense, so the day-after price may not be exactly reduced by the dividend, but any variance will be the result of non-dividend factors.
__________________
Ignoramus et ignorabimus
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 10:54 AM   #16
Dryer sheet wannabe
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Waxhaw
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldShooter View Post
Sadly, there is no free lunch out there, though we've all hoped to find one.

From a logical POV, consider a reductio ad absurdum example: A company that had no business and whose only asset was $1K in cash, which had issued only one share of stock, and the stock price was $1K. OK? Now consider what happens to the stock price after it distributes that $1K to its shareholder. It has to go to zero because there is no more value in the company. The shareholder is fine; he has the same portfolio value as before. But no speculator is likely bid the stock price above zero.

Another way to analyze the hypothesis is to observe that if your idea worked, it would be the equivalent of a free lunch. Free lunches have very short lives in the market. As soon as they are noticed they are arbitraged away. With well over 10,000 funds and institutions watching maybe 6,000 US stocks, any free lunches get noticed very quickly.

That said, beginning the day after a dividend is paid, the employees of any company will still be working away to add value, so one can expect that the stock price will rise appropriately. But that dividend money is gone from the company forever; simple arithmetic tells you that the value of the company must have been reduced accordingly.

None of this says that a dividend strategy is a bad one for any particular individual. Dr. French's idea of it being a forced spending curb might be just the right thing for some. But a dividend strategy is demonstrably not financially optimum for a long term investor. Stock prices are "noisy" in a statistical sense, so the day-after price may not be exactly reduced by the dividend, but any variance will be the result of non-dividend factors.
@Old Shooter. Thanks for the detailed explanation. I guess I wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing something before it was too late in my working career. I agree that there is no free lunch!
lennyandgragg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 10:58 AM   #17
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 246
Moderation and Balance is key to most things in life. So is with Dividend and Growth.

SCHD is the sweet spot.
yhoomajor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 11:07 AM   #18
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 246
Also, I see lot of naive assumptions on this forum about dividend vs non-dividend paying companies.

Lately, more and more Tech companies are included in heavier index (S&P500, Dow 30 and so on). Many (not all) of these companies that are newish, keep paying their employees and C-Suite executives high salaries (cash) as well as RSUs - aka newly printed shares. i.e. share dilution. So big chunk of that earning is funneled to executives who make hundreds of millions per year. They can afford to spend like drunk sailors, after all they don't have to budget or plan for dividends. It works while they are in hyper growth mode (buying revenues - NFLX, PYPL, SQ, Uber, TWTR, SNAP, Lyft, FB, RIVN, PLTR, SNOW, WDAY and so on). Eventually they hit the ceiling on growth front and then stock meets the reality.

Dividends bring discipline to companies's expense structure and plans. There are two kind of dividend paying companies:
- ones that have shrinking revenues (ex: tobacco companies, IBM)
- ones that are growing revenues

You want to stick with latter. Or just buy SCHD for income-focused portion of your portfolio.
yhoomajor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2022, 11:31 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
OldShooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: City
Posts: 10,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennyandgragg1 View Post
@Old Shooter. Thanks for the detailed explanation. I guess I wanted to make sure I wasn’t missing something before it was too late in my working career. I agree that there is no free lunch!
I think we all started our serious investing careers looking for those free lunches. In my case I tried to use Fourier analysis of historical price series to predict prices. Failed, of course.

Here is what I now tell my adult-ed investing classes: "Investing is boring. If you're not bored, you're not doing it right."
__________________
Ignoramus et ignorabimus
OldShooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VDIGX or VQNPX? Looking for a Dividend Fund Stillwater007 FIRE and Money 2 03-02-2021 11:54 PM
Looking for a Vanguard Dividend Fund for long term into retirement Stillwater007 FIRE and Money 8 02-19-2021 11:01 AM
Dividend ETF vs Individual Dividend Stocks JackJester FIRE and Money 33 11-13-2018 04:06 PM
Dividend Growth / Dividend Income Investing for RE CabinLifeAt50 Active Investing, Market Strategies & Alternative Assets 43 05-20-2016 07:01 AM
Ultimate Dividend Playbook; Dividend Harvest Portfolio FUEGO FIRE and Money 22 08-12-2008 11:16 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.