There are people of all stripes here, even people like me who retired and are now back at w*rk.
In my case, I retired in 2009 and was (and remain) FI. After a year, I took a part time j*b teaching (college adjunct). First one class, then two classes, then three classes. Then a full time slot opened up and for the last 3+ years I've been teaching full time. I'm doing this because I like the mental stimulation, the job hours are flexible (outside of the class time which is three days a week), and I have a child in high school (I didn't want him to see Dad just sitting around or playing all the time).
I am also a individual stock holder, but unlike you have avoided broker recommendations from the early 80's. When I first started investing, I spent a lot of time at a brokerage, and got to know them. What I learned was in general they weren't the sharpest tools in the shed. I also liked (and still like) to make my own investment decisions...as a result I have no one else but myself to blame (or to praise).
Unlike many here, I think it is possible to outperform indexes, but unlike you I believe it is very difficult for large mutual fund companies to outperform the indexes (over a long period of time). Note I didn't say impossible, just difficult (in my opinion). Having said that, I am also aware that I might be wrong.
So, I have about 50% of my assets in low cost mostly passive index funds, and the 50% in individual securities and sector oriented funds. Quite a few of my individual stock holdings are very long term: MAR (1990), AAPL (2000), BAX (1989), EW(1989, Bax spinoff), HON (2003), ADI (1990 via LLTC), and so on...
So don't get discouraged into thinking that is just one school of thought here. But at the same time, remember that we try to be nice to each other here, even when someone disagrees....unlike just about any other Internet forum out there these days.