Guys, I appreciate the advice and as strange as it sounds, I really want holes blown in what I’m contemplating. Naturally I'm plan on leaving the funds in the IRA until properties present themselves; sorry if I mislead otherwise. Similarly, the figures on my current properties’ return were excepting mortgage costs, which I actually DO currently have. That said, I can see why you are all recommending a more conservative approach; I’ll try to clarify my thoughts further below. I apologize for the lengthy post.
As to carrying mortgage balances.... last year (well on my 2010 tax return anyhow) I paid ~$21k in mortgage interest.... Paying that off alone will account for HALF of what I would get in a monthly stipend from the traditional pension. I also live in a cottage (as well as have a 1000sf workshop) on the back lot of one of the properties; my thought process on paying that off is that even if the rental market dried up completely, I would still have somewhere to live for only taxes and maintenance costs for the rest of my life. In addition, there is a duplex on the front of the property that currently generates $1200/mo income. Add that to the $1000/month in mortgage interest for that property, I’m looking at $2200 month in savings and income PLUS a free home and shop... in ONE property!
The 43% “hit” represents 33% income tax plus a 10% ER penalty (figures from my accountant). The funds in the account are 100% pre-tax; I contributed nothing to it with after tax dollars. So in my simplistic view 25-28% of the money would have gone to Uncle anyhow if it were a post-tax contribution. The 10% penalty amortized over the next 7.5 years (until I am 59.5) amounts ~$7K year.....OR about the rental income from ONE unit.
As a retiring firefighter with 25 years, I could collect the monthly stipend with no penalty at all right now, BUT aside from what I mentioned earlier about the doubts I have of the continued viability of the fund, were I to die prematurely the stipend ends and the principle is retained by the State.... NOTHING goes to my heirs! As bad as that sounds, I have no children and I could take care of my S/O with a life insurance policy, BUT the thought of the State keeping “my” money just irks me!
So, IF I left the money in an IRA and paid all the interest on my current properties, the interest alone would just about negate the 43%... AND I would be forced to postpone retirement for 7.5 years! Am I looking at this wrong?