|
Pension options - income leveling
10-26-2017, 02:04 PM
|
#1
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
|
Pension options - income leveling
Hi All,
58 yr old female retiring at end of year after 31 years. Spouse is 65 and working part-time. We've never lived an extravagant lifestyle.
We have no debt. House paid for, all kids educated, grown and gone. (However, there are house projects/updates that need to be done, i.e. 40 yr old kitchen, basement remodel, refinishing floors.) Our health is excellent. Any inheritance is unknown.
We don't have a large retirement portfolio.
My pension will be $3000/mo. and my health insurance is paid for.
I have small IRA of $100,000. My SS statement indicates I can collect SS @ 62 of $1530 or @ 65 of $1818 or @67 of $2200.
Spouse has 401K of $350,000 and will begin drawing full SS in 6 months of $2,400/mo. Spouse and I plan on working part-time for a few years so we don't have to touch either IRA/401K for as along as possible.
My Q is about pension options I have. I have 3 choices:
Regular pension of $3,000 /mo with 3% COLA
Income leveling pension based on SS @ 62: $4,000/mo with 3% COLA, then reduced by $1530/mo starting at 62
Income leveling pension based on SS @ 67: $3,930/mo with 3% COLA, then reduced by $2200/mo starting at 67.
I've run numbers and break even scenarios and it seems the straight Pension w/o leveling is the better choice long term.
The extra $$ provided by the leveling options is enticing as it would let us take care of some house projects earlier; however, the pension $$ given up over the long run seems to make these options a bad deal.
Any thoughts on these options?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
10-26-2017, 02:48 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
|
Off the cuff I would concur that straight pension sounds most attractive.... largest ultimate benefit so those 3% COLAs accrue on a larger amount. You may have already done this but it would be fairly easy to schedule out the cash flows and the PV assuming living to specific ages.
Does the pension provide for joint annuity benefits?
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 02:59 PM
|
#3
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
|
I was curious...... looks like beyond age 74 you are ahead with the straight pension. How lucky do you feel?
| Cash flows with 3% COLA | | | | PV at 7% | | | Age | Straight | Level 62 | Level 67 | | Straight | Level 62 | Level 67 | 59 | 3,000 | 4,000 | 3,930 | | 2,804 | 3,738 | 3,673 | 60 | 3,090 | 4,120 | 4,048 | | 5,503 | 7,337 | 7,208 | 61 | 3,183 | 4,244 | 4,169 | | 8,101 | 10,801 | 10,612 | 62 | 3,278 | 2,633 | 4,294 | | 10,602 | 12,810 | 13,888 | 63 | 3,377 | 2,712 | 4,423 | | 13,009 | 14,744 | 17,042 | 64 | 3,478 | 2,794 | 4,556 | | 15,326 | 16,606 | 20,078 | 65 | 3,582 | 2,878 | 4,693 | | 17,557 | 18,398 | 23,000 | 66 | 3,690 | 2,964 | 4,833 | | 19,705 | 20,123 | 25,813 | 67 | 3,800 | 3,053 | 2,192 | | 21,772 | 21,783 | 27,005 | 68 | 3,914 | 3,145 | 2,257 | | 23,762 | 23,382 | 28,153 | 69 | 4,032 | 3,239 | 2,325 | | 25,677 | 24,921 | 29,257 | 70 | 4,153 | 3,336 | 2,395 | | 27,521 | 26,402 | 30,320 | 71 | 4,277 | 3,436 | 2,467 | | 29,296 | 27,828 | 31,344 | 72 | 4,406 | 3,539 | 2,541 | | 31,004 | 29,200 | 32,329 | 73 | 4,538 | 3,645 | 2,617 | | 32,649 | 30,521 | 33,278 | 74 | 4,674 | 3,755 | 2,695 | | 34,232 | 31,793 | 34,191 | 75 | 4,814 | 3,867 | 2,776 | | 35,756 | 33,018 | 35,070 | 76 | 4,959 | 3,983 | 2,859 | | 37,223 | 34,196 | 35,916 | 77 | 5,107 | 4,103 | 2,945 | | 38,636 | 35,331 | 36,730 | 78 | 5,261 | 4,226 | 3,034 | | 39,995 | 36,423 | 37,514 | 79 | 5,418 | 4,353 | 3,125 | | 41,304 | 37,474 | 38,268 |
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.
Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 03:16 PM
|
#4
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
|
My pension provides for survivor benefits.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 03:20 PM
|
#5
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski
I was curious...... looks like beyond age 74 you are ahead with the straight pension. How lucky do you feel?
Cash flows with 3% COLA PV at 7% | Age Straight Level 62 Level 67 Straight Level 62 Level 67 | 59 3,000 4,000 3,930 2,804 3,738 3,673 | 60 3,090 4,120 4,048 5,503 7,337 7,208 | 61 3,183 4,244 4,169 8,101 10,801 10,612 | 62 3,278 2,633 4,294 10,602 12,810 13,888 | 63 3,377 2,712 4,423 13,009 14,744 17,042 | 64 3,478 2,794 4,556 15,326 16,606 20,078 | 65 3,582 2,878 4,693 17,557 18,398 23,000 | 66 3,690 2,964 4,833 19,705 20,123 25,813 | 67 3,800 3,053 2,192 21,772 21,783 27,005 | 68 3,914 3,145 2,257 23,762 23,382 28,153 | 69 4,032 3,239 2,325 25,677 24,921 29,257 | 70 4,153 3,336 2,395 27,521 26,402 30,320 | 71 4,277 3,436 2,467 29,296 27,828 31,344 | 72 4,406 3,539 2,541 31,004 29,200 32,329 | 73 4,538 3,645 2,617 32,649 30,521 33,278 | 74 4,674 3,755 2,695 34,232 31,793 34,191 | 75 4,814 3,867 2,776 35,756 33,018 35,070 | 76 4,959 3,983 2,859 37,223 34,196 35,916 | 77 5,107 4,103 2,945 38,636 35,331 36,730 | 78 5,261 4,226 3,034 39,995 36,423 37,514 | 79 5,418 4,353 3,125 41,304 37,474 38,268 |
|
SS indicates my life expectancy is 86.6....so just going on stats, seems like more $$ is needed as you age.
|
|
|
10-26-2017, 03:33 PM
|
#6
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Flyover country
Posts: 25,197
|
Inflation is likely to be higher in the future IMHO than it has been recently, so that COLA is a nice benefit. I believe I would go for the straight pension.
__________________
I thought growing old would take longer.
|
|
|
10-31-2017, 10:41 AM
|
#7
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 138
|
I question the numbers in the OP, as the SS statement assumes that one works until the date the SS benefit is claimed.
Retiring @ 58, after 31 years of SS contributions would result in lesser SS benefits than those listed here.
Then it is unclear whether the "leveling" of the pension would take into account these reduced SS benefits, or is still based on the numbers shown in the current SS statement.
Due diligence demands double-checking and a good understanding of these aspects.
|
|
|
10-31-2017, 11:14 AM
|
#8
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 17,008
|
OP needs to use the SS calculator at the SS website (where you enter in your actual values from statement) and then reduced or zero for future years until retirement. To get a real true set of SS numbers.
The SS statement assumes you work until 62 at a minimum.
|
|
|
10-31-2017, 01:44 PM
|
#9
|
Confused about dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
|
I have 31 years of employment with my current employer only. I have actually been working full time since age 17, when I graduated as a junior, so I have more than 31 years of SS contributions.
As for the SS calculator, it was used as well and it was set at 0 for future years, even though I will continue working my part-time job. My pension system had me do this in order to get a clearer picture of
Didn't know I needed to put in all these details in order to get responses....
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|