Join Early Retirement Today
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Does your HOA get to approve your sales/rents?
Old 01-08-2019, 10:42 AM   #1
Moderator
Aerides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 13,846
Does your HOA get to approve your sales/rents?

I live in a "normal" SFH community (not a condo, still cut my own lawn, no gates, no club, but common areas, a small park and dock, are maintained). Low fee, low service kinda normal. Rules are somewhat loose and haven't changed much since the 80's.

Suddenly, our board proposes that they want amendments to require applications for any new rental or sale, with 30 days to approve, and include background checks, credit reports, etc. IOW, when i go to sell, I have to tell a buyer he must wait for a month and submit to a background check, before I can take the offer, potentially making another neighborhood with no wait seem far more attractive... Same for rentals even if the owner does their own checks (as I'm sure many do). And if I owned a rental in the neighborhood I'd look to sell and get rid of it vs. this malarkey.... (selling any time soon for me is not an option, but will be in about 5 years).

I'm concerned this will slow property sales, which hurts sale prices, and sounds like the sort of thing that hurts 100% of people for a potential .01% "catch" of someone with a dodgy past.

Anyone have an HOA with similar rules? I'm going to the board meeting tonight so arm me with good stuff!
Aerides is offline   Reply With Quote
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 01-08-2019, 10:53 AM   #2
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,951
I would think this would be torpedoed by any mortgage lien holders
unless they exempt bank foreclosure sales from the restrictions.


I would think this would also run afoul of fair housing laws.
Spock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:00 AM   #3
Full time employment: Posting here.
MrsHaloFIRE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerides View Post
I live in a "normal" SFH community (not a condo, still cut my own lawn, no gates, no club, but common areas, a small park and dock, are maintained). Low fee, low service kinda normal. Rules are somewhat loose and haven't changed much since the 80's.

Suddenly, our board proposes that they want amendments to require applications for any new rental or sale, with 30 days to approve, and include background checks, credit reports, etc. IOW, when i go to sell, I have to tell a buyer he must wait for a month and submit to a background check, before I can take the offer, potentially making another neighborhood with no wait seem far more attractive... Same for rentals even if the owner does their own checks (as I'm sure many do). And if I owned a rental in the neighborhood I'd look to sell and get rid of it vs. this malarkey.... (selling any time soon for me is not an option, but will be in about 5 years).

I'm concerned this will slow property sales, which hurts sale prices, and sounds like the sort of thing that hurts 100% of people for a potential .01% "catch" of someone with a dodgy past.

Anyone have an HOA with similar rules? I'm going to the board meeting tonight so arm me with good stuff!
Wondering what they are teyong to achieve. Preventing rundown properties? Avoiding registered sex offenders as residents? I would look to the root cause. Sounding more like a condo board approval then a low-key HOA
MrsHaloFIRE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:05 AM   #4
gone traveling
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,586
No, although all sales require a release from the HOA to ensure all association fees have been paid by the seller and are not in arrears. Does your HOA require a majority approval by the members to pass something like that? Can't imagine members supporting such an amendment.
eytonxav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:17 AM   #5
Moderator
Aerides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 13,846
Our HOA requires 70% approval from all members to pass, so I'm hoping if nothing else, it will fail from lack of enough votes and turn out. They weren't even smart enough to provide prepaid postage for the voting forms.

And yup there's another amendment to lower that threshold for future votes to 60% - I'm voting against that one too!

But you know how people get - this is being marketed as "to protect our family neighborhood", and yes.... there is a current owner who is a registered sex offender. But 5 mins of googling shows that was a relatively tame incident 15 years ago, not a pedophile or rapist situation. Seems to me like a major overreaction, and they aren't even specifying what would constitute a denial in the new bylaws (yes they are written by the lawyer, so I presume they might be legal).
Aerides is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:17 AM   #6
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ivinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerides View Post
I live in a "normal" SFH community (not a condo, still cut my own lawn, no gates, no club, but common areas, a small park and dock, are maintained). Low fee, low service kinda normal. Rules are somewhat loose and haven't changed much since the 80's.

Suddenly, our board proposes that they want amendments to require applications for any new rental or sale, with 30 days to approve, and include background checks, credit reports, etc. IOW, when i go to sell, I have to tell a buyer he must wait for a month and submit to a background check, before I can take the offer, potentially making another neighborhood with no wait seem far more attractive... Same for rentals even if the owner does their own checks (as I'm sure many do). And if I owned a rental in the neighborhood I'd look to sell and get rid of it vs. this malarkey.... (selling any time soon for me is not an option, but will be in about 5 years).

I'm concerned this will slow property sales, which hurts sale prices, and sounds like the sort of thing that hurts 100% of people for a potential .01% "catch" of someone with a dodgy past.

Anyone have an HOA with similar rules? I'm going to the board meeting tonight so arm me with good stuff!
Sounds to me like most of the board members don't plan to either rent or sell and want to have total control over everything..I'm not sure its legal as to the selling hold and fair housing laws.
ivinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:29 AM   #7
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
RunningBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 13,184
Spock's point is good. I would ask them if they have buy-in from the lien holders, and insist on this as a condition to pass it. They'll never get it. Nor should they.
RunningBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:37 AM   #8
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,830
No, never heard of such a thing.

We would not consider buying into a HOA that had any restrictions like that.

I would not worry. I think that common sense will prevail over the outlandish wishes/proposals of what is probably a few people on the board.

I wonder if the Board has bothered to get some legal advice on this.
brett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 11:46 AM   #9
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by brett View Post
No, never heard of such a thing.

We would not consider buying into a HOA that had any restrictions like that.

I would not worry. I think that common sense will prevail over the outlandish wishes/proposals of what is probably a few people on the board.

I wonder if the Board has bothered to get some legal advice on this.

Having attended several HOA meetings, I would in no way rely on common sense, either in the board or the residents, to prevail. One person whispers "keep out sex offenders" and all the soccer moms will rally around it.
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups".
- attributed to George Carlin
Spock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 12:40 PM   #10
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,134
Yes, my HOA requires that all rental agreements be long term and approved by the HOA. This was passed by the homeowners years ago to protect themselves from rental units that were filled with people who did not give a dang about the community. Cars illegally parked, illegal modifications to the outside of the building, trash left outside for critters to get into, violations of various rules and CCRs, etc.

We limit rentals to long term (6 month minimum) and no more than 20% of the total units. So no Airbnb rentals. There are exceptions. For example, one can rent ones home to immediate family - children, parents, grandkids.

However, our rules do make it impossible to get FHA financing. So far that has not been a problem.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 12:40 PM   #11
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,314
I remember an HOA meeting at our weekend house where one member was proposing a vigilante committee be deputized to tear down some trees a neighbor had planted that the self help proponent complained obstructed his view.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 12:56 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Chuckanut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 17,134
Our HOA needs to approve rental agreements to make sure they are complaint with HOA rules and the CCRs. We limit rentals to 20% of the units. It has worked well for all involved. In particular all rentals must be a minimum of 6 months. No Airbnb stuff allowed. There are exceptions - anybody can rent to an immediate family member - kids, parents, grand-kids, and it is not counted as part of the 20%.
__________________
Comparison is the thief of joy

The worst decisions are usually made in times of anger and impatience.
Chuckanut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 01:02 PM   #13
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
mpeirce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 3,181
This could affect home your home values.

Both My DM and DB live in coops. The coop boards have this kind of power and use it. It REALLY slows down sales and many potential sales are rejected. Which explains why the coop units are generally cheaper than non coop condos.
mpeirce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 01:15 PM   #14
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,971
One of an HOA's main objectives is to enhance/maintain property value. This rule would not do that.
COcheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 01:18 PM   #15
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,232
I'd suggest going door to door an making sure that everybody effected knows about this. There is a tendency for owners to become complacent, and not participate in the process of understanding and questioning the decisions of those who are in power. Consequently, there is a tendency for those in power to come to consider their constituents as their personal domain. We have seen this in our area. One guy went to the meetings, and he couldn't believe what was being considered. He made sure we all knew, and when we all showed up and voiced our dissension, that was the end of some pretty crazy ideas.
I'd bet that when you explain how these restrictions could effect their property values, most will be eager to get more involved.
HadEnuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 01:26 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,204
Our association documents require both sales and leases be approved by the association. The approval process is routine in my experience... if they ever denied an application they would need to make sure that they are on solid ground to avoid a discrimination lawsuit.

The documents further provide that if the Board disapproves or fails to approve that within 15 days and the Owner intends to close anyway that the Board gets an additional 30 days and the Board or any other owner has a right of first refusal to buy the property under the same terms as the subject sale. It gets more complicated from there.

In our situation, it doesn't impede the sale process.... we agreed everything and went under contract as any other transaction... it is just at the same time that we excuted the P&S we also did the application to purchase a unit. The application is pretty simple... one page... and just has contact info, employer, occupation, title, 2 bank references, 2 credit references, personal references, who will be living there, etc. No SS# or financial info required.

To be honest, I don't think that they do much with it but it is more to weed out people who are unwilling to apply. I know in our case the application got lost in the shuffle but our closing agent did receive approval and the transaction happened anyway.... I know this because when I emailed a member of the board to add us to the list for the newsletter that he had no knowledge of our purchase... also, they never charged us the $100 fee they were supposed to... I didn't include payment with the application assuming that it would be charged to us on the closing statement and it wasn't on the closing statement.

There is a delicate balance between wanting to screen certain undesireables from buying but at the same time being careful not to discriminate and get sued which is costly to the association.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 01:33 PM   #17
Moderator
Walt34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern WV Panhandle
Posts: 25,290
While we live in an HOA community, the HOA is pretty laid-back and reasonable. I've never heard of such a proposal and would be vehemently opposed to any such proposition. And it is unlikely that I've consider buying into a community with such rules because it would make it such a pain to sell.
__________________
When I was a kid I wanted to be older. This is not what I expected.
Walt34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 02:17 PM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Amethyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 12,566
We sold a house, and then a townhouse, in a planned community with several layers of governing associations.

We rented out the townhouse. Leases had to be for one year or more. Nobody told us whom to rent to - that would have been seen, rightly, as discriminatory. We sold in 2014, though, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a sex-offender clause in the governing docs now. The townhouse HOA retained an attorney.

The associations conduct independent periodic inspections, which always found something we had to fix, or something the renters were doing (e.g. install a window a/c unit) that violated some guideline. We then had to get the tenants to comply.

The townhouse HOA could put liens on properties, which prevented selling. The liens could be if the property owner had fees in arrears, or violated any architectural guideline. To put the townhouse on the market, we had to paint the front porch a different shade of white, replace all the outdoor lighting fixtures with brand-new ones, and various other things.

Now it is coming back to me that the HOA probably could not legally stop a sale for "violations." But any new owners would immediately be hit with "noncompliance," and few people would want to buy under those circumstances.
__________________
If you understood everything I say, you'd be me ~ Miles Davis
'There is only one success – to be able to spend your life in your own way.’ Christopher Morley.
Even a blind clock finds an acorn twice a day.
Amethyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 02:23 PM   #19
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Rustic23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Livingston, Tx
Posts: 4,203
I am on our HOA board. I would think it would depend on how the HOA is structured and what powers are granted to the HOA. Our HOA gets it's power for covenants/deed restrictions. If we wanted to invoke this type of restriction we would need a change to those restrictions, which would require a majority vote of the subdivision owners. Each subdivision is set up differently. I have never see an HOA with this type of power. We did pass an amendment to our deed restrictions that said the HOA needed to be notified of renters within 60 days of the lease. i.e. before or after. The purpose of the amendment was to have contact information for residence in the neighborhood.
__________________
If it is after 5:00 when I post I reserve the right to disavow anything I posted.
Rustic23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 02:52 PM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
Sunset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Spending the Kids Inheritance and living in Chicago
Posts: 16,973
I've certainly heard of the rental restriction rule, but never a for sale rule.

If OP had more time, OP could go around door to door and collect proxy forms from owners not going, then OP would have many votes.
I wonder if the Board has collected proxies, and already has enough votes to win. ?
__________________
Fortune favors the prepared mind. ... Louis Pasteur
Sunset is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please Approve This Joke TromboneAl Other topics 17 06-08-2015 12:37 PM
Rentals; How often do you raise rents? bentley FIRE and Money 10 06-20-2012 04:36 PM
Where will rents go? Buku FIRE and Money 15 01-29-2008 06:01 PM
CPI and Equivalent Rents audreyh1 FIRE and Money 0 06-14-2006 08:05 AM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.