I am on the perm early voting list - rec'd no ballot. Called they said they fix, no ballot. On hold 24 minutes this time. . .
Odd that no one answered why we can't do it online. I thought maybe everyone but me already knew . . . seriously. Nevermind.
I am on the perm early voting list - rec'd no ballot. Called they said they fix, no ballot. On hold 24 minutes this time. . .
Really if you all believe my taxes are right why can't my vote be?
Odd that no one answered why we can't do it online. I thought maybe everyone but me already knew . . . seriously. Nevermind.
Votes are anonymous, banking isn’t
Every electronic transaction in the conventional banking system is tied to a specific sender and recipient who can confirm that a transaction is valid or raise the alarm if it isn't. Banks count on customers to periodically review their transactions—either online or in paper statements—and notify the bank if fraudulent transactions occur.
By contrast, experts told me, elections are supposed to be secret. In-person elections don't just allow voters to cast a secret ballot, they typically require them to do so. Mandatory secrecy insulates voters from coercion by bosses, abusive spouses, elder care workers, or others in positions of power or influence.
It's hard to prove online voting is secure
For an ordinary voter without a technology background, this kind of debate may be impenetrable. And that points to a fundamental downside to the concept of voting online. A voting system doesn't just need to be secure—it needs to be provably secure. And the proof of its security needs to be understandable by ordinary voters.
Online vote-hacking scales
Online election hacking also scales in a way that tampering with an offline election doesn't. Someone can hack an online election from anywhere in the world. A hacker who finds a vulnerability in a voting software package can exploit that same weakness in every jurisdiction that uses the software.
By contrast, tampering with the results of a conventional paper-based election is massively labor-intensive. An attacker needs to physically visit the locations where ballots are collected, stored, or counted. If someone wants to modify the results of 100 precincts, they may need to recruit 99 confederates to pull off an attack.
This is a particularly significant difference if you're worried about attacks by foreign governments. It's trivial for the Russian government to hire 100 hackers to attack American election infrastructure from a comfortable office building in Moscow
Odd that no one answered why we can't do it online. I thought maybe everyone but me already knew . . . seriously. Nevermind.
Don't some states and countries currently allow online voting? I have not heard of any major problems. I think it could be done with sufficient safeguards.
Odd that no one answered why we can't do it online. I thought maybe everyone but me already knew . . . seriously. Nevermind.