freedomatlast
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 1,189
We're looking at possibly purchasing a house that was built in 1984 and the exterior of the house was constructed with Dryvit and areas of Ceder. It looks to be in good condition but I've read plenty of horror stories about moisture entrapment behind Dryvit causing mold and rot that may be tough to detect until major damage has been done. In fact, the disclosures around here make the seller disclose if Dryvit or other synthetic stucco has been used.
Of course if we move forward, we would make an offer contingent upon an inspection by someone who is an expert in this area, but the other issue is when it comes time to sell, it may be tough to move the house because of public perception of this product.
The location, layout and other features suit us perfectly, and except for crazy high property taxes, it's a good fit for us.
Anyone here have any experience or perspective on this subject?
Of course if we move forward, we would make an offer contingent upon an inspection by someone who is an expert in this area, but the other issue is when it comes time to sell, it may be tough to move the house because of public perception of this product.
The location, layout and other features suit us perfectly, and except for crazy high property taxes, it's a good fit for us.
Anyone here have any experience or perspective on this subject?
Last edited: