What, a ton of gearheads on this forum, and they let the above question go unanswered. ....
I was waiting for the chemical engineers, this is a chemistry problem!
Related to that, I recall a very bright engineer I worked with. He wasn't an EE, he was a physics major. He said it made no difference, it's all the same stuff, he just had to learn the electronic specifics. But he was a very bright guy, so easy for him to cross disciplines.
He also made the claim that there was no such thing as an electrical failure. The electrons always did exactly as they were expected to. Electronics failed due to mechanical problems (broken wires), chemical problems (like those batteries, or dendrite growth on circuit boards), or later, with embedded software, due to programming problems.
Back to the question though - I think this is related to the other thread on the bounce test for a dead battery. As the chemicals change form, they expand, leading to leakage.
Lithium keeps getting better and cheaper, maybe alkalines will be out of circulation someday soon - though they need to improve the self-discharge rate of lithium before that will happen.
Reminds me of another story. When my son was a teen, he went to buy batteries for his portable CD player, and figured 'Heavy Duty' batteries must be really good. I had to explain that term came about in the 40's or there-a-bouts - yes, they were better than the old carbon-zinc, but awful compared to modern alkaline. They must be a few cents cheaper though (or less likely to leak today?), because if electronics come with batteries installed (like in a remote), they are usually the old type, not alkaline. Save a few cents on a $1,000 TV?
-ERD50