|
|
If there was ever Absolutely Nothing would there ever be....anything?
04-26-2008, 03:57 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
If there was ever Absolutely Nothing would there ever be....anything?
Picture the infinite universe as containing nothing. It has no light, no dust, no particles of any kind, no air, no elements, no molecules, no spirit, no force fields. It's absolute nothingness. In fact, we can call it Absolutely Nothing.
So here's the question: if originally -- bazillions of years ago -- there was Absolutely Nothing, could there ever be....anything? What is your answer and what are the implications of your answer?
I need to know.
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
04-26-2008, 04:00 PM
|
#2
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: athens
Posts: 802
|
Will this affect the overall return of my retirement portfolio?
__________________
Can't you see yourself in the nursing home saying, " Darn! Wish I'd spent more time at the office instead of wasting time with family and friends."
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 04:09 PM
|
#3
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,228
|
Until someone proves otherwise, the evidence is that the total quantity of matter and energy available in the universe is a fixed amount and never more or less.
__________________
.
No more lawyer stuff, no more political stuff, so no more CYA
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 04:30 PM
|
#4
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashflo2u2
Picture the infinite universe as containing nothing. It has no light, no dust, no particles of any kind, no air, no elements, no molecules, no spirit, no force fields. It's absolute nothingness. In fact, we can call it Absolutely Nothing.
So here's the question: if originally -- bazillions of years ago -- there was Absolutely Nothing, could there ever be....anything? What is your answer and what are the implications of your answer?
I need to know.
|
Here's my highly unscientific, highly un-mathematical explanation:
Note that 0 = 1 + (-1)
We may (without loss of generality) interpret this as saying that nothing (i.e., 0 in the above equation) is the combination of the universe (i.e., the "one"-verse, denoted by "1" in the above equation) and the negative universe (or anti-universe, denoted by "-1" in the above equation).
Also note that physicists have proven the existence of "anti-particles." For example the anti-particle of a proton is an anti-proton. The particles constitute the universe, the anti-particles, the anti-universe. Combine a particle with an anti-particle and you get a "nothing" particle as predicted by the above equation.
QED
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 04:30 PM
|
#5
|
Gone but not forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,924
|
Are you older than 21 and not using weed?
__________________
"Knowin' no one nowhere's gonna miss us when we're gone..."
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 04:33 PM
|
#6
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tightasadrum
Will this affect the overall return of my retirement portfolio?
|
If there's nothing, it's really hard to get much of a return on your investments.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 05:30 PM
|
#7
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashflo2u2
Picture the infinite universe as containing nothing. It has no light, no dust, no particles of any kind, no air, no elements, no molecules, no spirit, no force fields. It's absolute nothingness. In fact, we can call it Absolutely Nothing.
|
Sounds like there is no "there" there so it can't be pictured. Once you start to picture it you add spacial dimensions and then you no longer have nothing.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 05:44 PM
|
#8
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
Sounds like there is no "there" there so it can't be pictured. Once you start to picture it you add spacial dimensions and then you no longer have nothing.
|
Quote from Gertrude Stein: "There is no there there" [referring to Oakland, CA]
Sounds like you have just described Oakland.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 06:15 PM
|
#9
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,811
|
Einstein would say if there were no matter then the only thing there could be is pure energy if the Nothing become something. Matter and energy can and do change back and forth so if there is no matter but later there is then what was there has to be only energy.
__________________
Work? I don't have time to work....I'm retired.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 06:27 PM
|
#10
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff
Sounds like there is no "there" there so it can't be pictured. Once you start to picture it you add spacial dimensions and then you no longer have nothing.
|
Is that the same as saying that "Nothing" is a noun and therefore must refer to something? I hope not.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 06:30 PM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
Look, the title to this board is "Life After Fire" so I thought this was an appropriate place to ask such a question. Plus, I find the denizens of these boards to be highly intelligent, humorous and knowledgeable on many issues.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:00 PM
|
#12
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 979
|
You can't imagine absolute nothingness. By imagining nothing you are, in fact, imagining something, and if you're imagining something then something has to be in that something that you're imagining. Kind of like when you're doing nothing (laying around the house, being lazy, etc) you're still doing something. You're forced to give nothingness somethingness.
What you then have is an infinite number, because even 0 is the absence of something, and you cannot go below a 0 sum of anything, at least in real world math. What you're suggesting is taking an infinite number (absolute nothingness) and seeing if something can be added to it. However, that's impossible, because if you can add something to infinity, you're not really at infinity because at that point nothing can be added; you'd always have one more thing that could be added.
So, maybe the better question is "imagine a tiny ball of something, outside of which no time or space exists or matter exists: could the universe have really come from that?" Was this originally supposed to be a kind of theological question?
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:16 PM
|
#13
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2006
Location: west coast, hi there!
Posts: 8,808
|
I got a real kick out of reading this thread -- very imaginative answers. The existence of this thread definitely proves that we can have nothingness.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:16 PM
|
#14
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetiredGypsy
You can't imagine absolute nothingness. By imagining nothing you are, in fact, imagining something, and if you're imagining something then something has to be in that something that you're imagining. Kind of like when you're doing nothing (laying around the house, being lazy, etc) you're still doing something. You're forced to give nothingness somethingness.
What you then have is an infinite number, because even 0 is the absence of something, and you cannot go below a 0 sum of anything, at least in real world math. What you're suggesting is taking an infinite number (absolute nothingness) and seeing if something can be added to it. However, that's impossible, because if you can add something to infinity, you're not really at infinity because at that point nothing can be added; you'd always have one more thing that could be added.
So, maybe the better question is "imagine a tiny ball of something, outside of which no time or space exists or matter exists: could the universe have really come from that?" Was this originally supposed to be a kind of theological question?
|
Maybe I made the question a little too theatrical with the imagining part. I am not sure what you are saying about the theory of absence. Basically, are you answering the question saying that if there is something now, then there never could have been nothing? No, it was not a theological question but it could have theologically implications. When you are retired you think about these things.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:19 PM
|
#15
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 13,151
|
Sometimes it's most satisfying to just let the mystery be.......
__________________
"I wasn't born blue blood. I was born blue-collar." John Wort Hannam
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:24 PM
|
#16
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
|
Why “absolutely nothing” rather than just “nothing?”
The qualifier incorrectly waters down the definition of "nothing."
There is something or there is nothing. What’s in between?
The “absolutely” in your phrasing is as unnecessary as the “totally” in “totally unnecessary.”
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:24 PM
|
#17
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martha
Until someone proves otherwise, the evidence is that the total quantity of matter and energy available in the universe is a fixed amount and never more or less.
|
Ok. I guess Martha is saying that matter and energy are self existent and there never was nothing. That's an an plausible answer imo.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:28 PM
|
#18
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 332
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Average Joe
Why “absolutely nothing” rather than just “nothing?”
The qualifier incorrectly waters down the definition of "nothing."
There is something or there is nothing. What’s in between?
The “absolutely” in your phrasing is as unnecessary as the “totally” in “totally unnecessary.”
|
You are absolutely right, oops, I mean you are right.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:29 PM
|
#19
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tightasadrum
Will this affect the overall return of my retirement portfolio?
|
This is the best answer that ever will be.
|
|
|
04-26-2008, 07:35 PM
|
#20
|
Full time employment: Posting here.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 979
|
The closest we've gotten to any kind of original nothingness is the "Big Bang" theory. I think another popular one that hasn't quite died out yet was Carl Sagan's oscillating universe theory, but from what I've come to understand of it, it contradicts itself. Bill Bryson had a little blurb about it in A Short History of Nearly Everything. Hugely entertaining read. Another fascinating book on "something from nothing" is Lee Strobel's The Case For A Creator.
I am suggesting that there is a lot of something now, and the best we can come up with that doesn't involve complete speculation without any convincing supporting evidence (such as some variations of string or superstring theory; 11 dimensions of dancing strings? Abandoning Occam's Razor, much?) suggests that there was a beginning that had something in it. However, no theory can be explained by the purely physical. For example, if there was this tiny ball of "comic beginning stuff: now in easy to explode package!" then how do we get from unexcited cosmic goop that so far has been perfectly content to stay in its tiny ball to an expanding universe? If it's always been in an excited state and it just took a while to hit some sort of critical junction that started the whole show, then energy has been created from nothing, and that would make the baby Einstein cry.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|