Scarlet Johannsen caught on cell phone camera

[eytonxav]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...-pictures.html

 

[W2R]

I can't imagine why someone would keep nude photos of herself on her cell phone [-]and expect not to see them on the internet[/-] at all.

 

[Ronnieboy]

I was expecting the link to show the leaked photos.

Imagine my disappointment

 

[Bestwifeever]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...-pictures.html

Another naked link.

 

[MichaelB]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...-pictures.html

I was expecting the link to show the leaked photos.

Imagine my disappointment

Forum rules request members not post naked links. In this case, the post is naked but the link is not.

The irony is killing me...

 

[eytonxav]

I was expecting the link to show the leaked photos.

Imagine my disappointment

Haven't looked myself but imagine a little google work with find them for you

 

[Mulligan]

Haven't looked myself but imagine a little google work with find them for you

Actually I was on a website that linked it, so being the intellectually inquisitive person I am, I looked. Nothing too exciting, save the energy!

 

[BLS53]

The ones I've found, have the goodies blacked out. Too much to hope for I guess.

 

[calmloki]

The ones I've found, have the goodies blacked out. Too much to hope for I guess.

Think DFWM5 had a link in another thread - an Emma Watson link from that celebrasite:

http://i1130.photobucket.com/albums/m539/celebjihad/emma_watson_kitty.gif

Oh papparats! You so shameless!

 

[haha]

We have a winner!

 

[BigNick]

The ones I've found, have the goodies blacked out. Too much to hope for I guess.

One of them adorns this amusing (but NSFW) article, and the other can be found pretty easily with Google image search, if you turn Safe Search off. Apparently.

 

[MichaelB]

We can discuss this subject but please do not post links to sites with explicit images as per community rules here

Posts containing explicit, obscene or vulgar language, images or links to websites with adult content/images

 

[Purron]

 

[BigNick]

We can discuss this subject but please do not post links to sites with explicit images as per community rules here

Sorry. It's now too late for me to edit the post to remove the link, but I presume that a moderator could. (FWIW, for me, that photo isn't terribly "explicit" - the article itself is more NSFW - but seeing as I'm a forum moderator on a more conservative board than this one, I'm not going to get all "First Amendment" on you. )