yakers
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
As we get nearer retirement (my wife retires in a few weeks and I expect to work about 18 month more until younger son starts college) we are playing with ideas/dreams VS realities. I am originally a city boy (Chicago) and my wife grew up in a somewhat suburban Southern California environment. We live in a nice place, Pasadena CA, we would like to leave the smog and congestion but would like to keep the services, restaurants and entertainment as much as possible. Neither of us has lived in a rural world except for wonderful vacations. My ideal retirement world would be living in a place where I *could* walk to things if I wanted and maybe good public transportation as well. I lived in London for some years and that suited me. I also like Seattle, SF and Portland. But none of these are cheap. I have found a few small towns that I could live in like Nevada City, CA, that are small but progressive (no bullet holes through the deer crossing signs). It seems to me like a good small town near enough a city might be the way to go.
Any city folks decide to take up country life? Are the suburbs to be avoided in any case? All I’m looking for is a small town/urban neighborhood that is safe & affordable where I can walk to things, with public transportation, good services and maybe good weather too? Too much to ask? Access to local kayaking water is a major plus. For a while I was thinking about Madison WI but then remembered winter.
Any city folks decide to take up country life? Are the suburbs to be avoided in any case? All I’m looking for is a small town/urban neighborhood that is safe & affordable where I can walk to things, with public transportation, good services and maybe good weather too? Too much to ask? Access to local kayaking water is a major plus. For a while I was thinking about Madison WI but then remembered winter.