RunningBum
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 13,236
I want to play, too.
LOL, you must know Frank, that's how he made his money to start with!
I want to play, too.
.
The yield on his investments throws somewhere around 2% a year, which is a bit over half of what he needs.
Nice story, isn't it?
As you wrote, it's very important exactly which 100 stocks they are. And, in recent decades, a very meaningful portion of equity returns has come from a relatively small number of "superstar" stocks--if you didn't happen to include the next Microsoft in your 100 stocks, you might very well lag the market average by a considerable amount--more than a few basis points.
Here's a good article from Wm Bernstein. I doubt many of the fundamentals have changed since he wrote it in 2000. From the article:
And, as a bonus, those digesting the article get to see the word "kurtoskewness" in use, which is a treat in itself!
Franky got tired of working for the man so he ER'd before he could hit a 2% withdrawal rate, and he likes his bourbon too much to cut expenses.Franky effed up..... That 2% should had supplied 100% of what he needs.
***Warning I never did like Bernstein and I am not kind to him in the following post, this in no why reflects the respect I do have for Samclem***As you wrote, it's very important exactly which 100 stocks they are. And, in recent decades, a very meaningful portion of equity returns has come from a relatively small number of "superstar" stocks--if you didn't happen to include the next Microsoft in your 100 stocks, you might very well lag the market average by a considerable amount--more than a few basis points.
Here's a good article from Wm Bernstein. I doubt many of the fundamentals have changed since he wrote it in 2000. From the article:
And, as a bonus, those digesting the article get to see the word "kurtoskewness" in use, which is a treat in itself!
Franky got tired of working for the man so he ER'd before he could hit a 2% withdrawal rate, and he likes his bourbon too much to cut expenses.
Here's a story about a guy, frank ....
Nice story, isn't it?
I can't answer for anyone else, but I do it because:So why spend money on 1,000 stocks+ in the hopes of owning the ten superstar stocks?
That's overkill. I know some here are at that point, but I think a lot of those people either have great pensions that were worth working for until they were fully vested, or had opportunity to greatly pad the nest egg by working just a bit longer. Frankie wasn't in either category. 4% is cutting it a bit thin, but Frankie, who's a bit mum on giving out actual numbers, is probably closer to 3% than 4%, especially with some fat that could be trimmed and a house that could be downsized.I understand you don't live for ever.
Better to have 2% somewhat guaranteed than 4% that can vanish when next recession comes along.