OAG
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
It is his/hers (the dead one) or yours, whichever is the most (but not both). That does not consider the odd ones, like one drawing a non-SS benefit/retirement and one is drawing a SS Benefit.
Have not been to Lawry's in years, but I suspect it is still a great place for prime rib & steak ( a quick check of Chowhound.com confirmed that).
Another lower-cost CSO ticket option to consider in the future- Terrace seats. Those are the seats that are above and *behind* the orchestra.
We live on less than $30,000 most years .... but we do have some years like this year when we went to Europe for two months and also just bought a new Prius,
We eat there each year when we go up for the CSO Christmas concert. It's always excellent!!!
Those would be great seats! However, for the Christmas concert those are used by the choirs.
the oriiginal L.A. location is still great , they don't serve steaks at the LA
Lawry's (if i remember correctly), just prime rib..
I bought steaks at LA Lawry's in the late 60s. They had a huge grill right out in the dining room. Excellent meat!
Ha
Have not been to Lawry's in years, but I suspect it is still a great place for prime rib & steak ( a quick check of Chowhound.com confirmed that).
the oriiginal L.A. location is still great , they don't serve steaks at the LA
Lawry's (if i remember correctly), just prime rib..
I haven't retired yet, but I have been trying to figure out what I will need in retirement. I come up with closer to $40,000. And that does include budgeting for car replacement and house repairs. I think I have thought of all the expence catagories although my numbers might be off. But the median family income in the area I plan to retire in is $34,000 so I think it's doable.
Most of those living on $34K will be making mortgage or rent payments every month and some will be saving for their children's education.
It would be hard for them to do that on $34,000, though...........
But the median family income in the area I plan to retire in is $34,000 so I think it's doable.
Bottom line, I think it means very, very little to the OP what someone else spends.
...
Don't retire on someone else's budget, you may regret it.
-ERD50
I'll say it again - don't retire on someone else's budget.
I don't think anyone is looking at only what the average is or whether it is doable based on that alone. But if one is thinking of retiring with 30 thousand per year and has the knowledge that others have successfully retired on that amount that gives comfort to the impetus to take the action to retire and confidence that the planned level of spending is reasonable.You guys are seriously scaring me. I'll say it again - don't retire on someone else's budget.
What difference does it make what the median income is? Do they have the same expenses as you will in retirement? Are they paying the same health care rates you are? Etc, Etc, etc.
Sure, it is a data point that tells you something about the cost of living in that area. But that is all. Work out your own budget with your own numbers.
I'm reminded of that old story of the 6' tall statistician that drown in the 4' average depth pool.
-ERD50
I don't think anyone is looking at only what the average is or whether it is doable based on that alone.
Actually, that is not apples-apples at all. Firecalc uses historical returns, and the spending and income you enter. It is not using any groups average starting portfolio.One of the most popular features on this site is Firecalc which is nothing more than what the average expected return you can expect over the long term for the opposite of spending --- income. If the income side average is relevant I do not see how the average expense side is not relevant as well. ...
There seem to be a lot of folks who live on $30K or less who are under 65 who are have no health insurence, no life insurance, no LTC incurance (assuming they are somewhere over 50 or so). There is also talk of keeping cars forever, not budgeting for any emergencies and such. To me, that's living on the edge of disaster, not being remotely comfortable knowing that one major expense would put things over the edge. Sure, some may say they have $500K in the bank, but why live a lifestyle that denies yourself things? Where do people think the money is going to end up? You certainly can't take it with you.
The other think I can't quite understand is the desire to have a fully paid off house - do people really think that when the need the money in the house a bank is going to just throw money at them with little or no income? Maybe 5 years ago, but certainly not now. Banks like to loan money to people sho don't need it, not the other way around.
I know I feel a lot more comfortable with a relatively small mortage ($150K or so - and for the Wash, DC area, that's tiny) and know I have the money in case of an emergency. If it's all in the house, how do you get at it??
There seem to be a lot of folks who live on $30K or less who are under 65 who have no health insurance, no life insurance, no LTC incurance (assuming they are somewhere over 50 or so). There is also talk of keeping cars forever, not budgeting for any emergencies and such. To me, that's living on the edge of disaster, not being remotely comfortable knowing that one major expense would put things over the edge. .......
The other thing I can't quite understand is the desire to have a fully paid off house - do people really think that when they need the money in the house a bank is going to just throw money at them with little or no income?....... If it's all in the house, how do you get at it??