|
|
5 Easy Steps to Becoming a Millionaire
06-07-2011, 03:34 PM
|
#1
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
|
5 Easy Steps to Becoming a Millionaire
For the clueless, here is the five step process in a nutshell ...
Yahoo! Finance - Financially Fit
Quote:
Becoming a millionaire is easier than ever. While this is a dream that will take work and discipline to achieve, it isn't as far out of reach as you might think. Be smart with your money and before you know it, you'll be able to count yourself among the world's wealthier citizens
|
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
06-07-2011, 04:28 PM
|
#2
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,499
|
Nah, just marry one with a good prenup in your favor.
__________________
There must be moderation in everything, including moderation.
|
|
|
06-07-2011, 07:14 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,688
|
A selection of points from the Millionaire Next Door. As you say, very much for the clueless (or those who are "new" to the world of personal finance).
__________________
Budgeting is a skill practised by people who are bad at politics.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 03:59 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,072
|
Step 1: Get $200k. Repeat step 1 four more times.
eazy peazy
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 05:02 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinaco
Step 1: Get $200k. Repeat step 1 four more times.
eazy peazy
|
With respect, you are making this more complicated than it needs to be - the single step "get $1000k" programme is they way to go.
__________________
Budgeting is a skill practised by people who are bad at politics.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 07:02 AM
|
#6
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Crownsville
Posts: 3,709
|
I only married once. And I think that only set me back around $30-40K!
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 07:40 AM
|
#7
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Allen Park
Posts: 118
|
You did MUCH better than I.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 08:17 AM
|
#8
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,872
|
The article is a little simplistic
They also left out "Don't have any children".
But seriously a lot in society is conspiring against saving and investing. Most people live from pay check to pay check and yesterday Bernanke was encouraging us all to spend more to rev up the economy.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 08:57 AM
|
#9
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
|
Many Paths to FIRE
Quote:
Originally Posted by chinaco
Step 1: Get $200k. Repeat step 1 four more times.
eazy peazy
|
The Hunt Brothers had a somewhat different approach. They started with a $ multi-billion inherited portfolio and lost most of it trying to corner the silver market.
But they are now millionaires !
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 09:03 AM
|
#10
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,085
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nun
The article is a little simplistic
They also left out "Don't have any children".
|
There is a very strong economic disincentive to have children. I think this is unfortunate and will ultimately impact demographics quite strongly.
__________________
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
- George Orwell
Ezekiel 23:20
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 09:36 AM
|
#11
|
gone traveling
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 3,851
|
Assuming you are (hopefully happily) married, dosen't that suggest a gross estate net worth of at least $2M ($1M for each of you)?
Just wondering, since most (divorced) folks on this forum speak of a "financial split" after they have moved on...
$1M today? Chump change, IMHO...
Heck, for those of us that are/will be collecting SS and using the old 4% withdrawl (or inverse 25% times annual benefit) will put us well on our way to that perceived $1M goal.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 10:10 AM
|
#12
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345
... and will ultimately impact demographics quite strongly.
|
I'm still looking for the downside of slower population growth.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 03:27 PM
|
#13
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 332
|
You need X productive workers per non-productive worker to keep society working smoothly. What X is, is a matter of debate, but it's clear that as population growth slows, that means you have a bunch of older retired folks and not enough prime-working-age contributors to keep things running. It also obviously has major problems for any kind of old-age assistance programs like Social Security or Medicare, since those are funded by the taxes of the still-working younger generations. That's one big contributor to the financial problems with SS &etc -- declining numbers of workers paying $$ in, and increasing numbers of retirees pulling $$ out.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 03:40 PM
|
#14
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,391
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryInCO
You need X productive workers per non-productive worker to keep society working smoothly. What X is, is a matter of debate, but it's clear that as population growth slows, that means you have a bunch of older retired folks and not enough prime-working-age contributors to keep things running. It also obviously has major problems for any kind of old-age assistance programs like Social Security or Medicare, since those are funded by the taxes of the still-working younger generations. That's one big contributor to the financial problems with SS &etc -- declining numbers of workers paying $$ in, and increasing numbers of retirees pulling $$ out.
|
Ponzi scheme defined.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 04:10 PM
|
#15
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 106
|
Haha no kidding. Maybe if entitlements weren't set up as ponzi schemes to begin with it'd be ok...
__________________
I'm not obsessed with money, I'm obsessed with work! Er, rather the not doing it anymore part...
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 05:04 PM
|
#16
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 22,971
|
I heard of a much simpler two-step method to become a millionaire:
1. Start as a multimillionaire.
2. Buy a winery.
__________________
Living an analog life in the Digital Age.
|
|
|
06-08-2011, 09:01 PM
|
#17
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryInCO
You need X productive workers per non-productive worker to keep society working smoothly. What X is, is a matter of debate, but it's clear that as population growth slows, that means you have a bunch of older retired folks and not enough prime-working-age contributors to keep things running. It also obviously has major problems for any kind of old-age assistance programs like Social Security or Medicare, since those are funded by the taxes of the still-working younger generations. That's one big contributor to the financial problems with SS &etc -- declining numbers of workers paying $$ in, and increasing numbers of retirees pulling $$ out.
|
The way the discussion is framed, sure. But the only "fact" in that paragraph is that as population growth slows, the remaining population is older.
It's not as simple as it seems. Your framing of the other issues glosses over some "problems"-- a lack of wage growth compared to inflation over the last 25 years, lower taxes, higher chronic unemployment, the older working for longer years, and expanding social programs that are part of Social Security and Medicare. So while "X" may be 2:1 in one generation under one set of rules, it may be 5:1 in another generation with another set of rules. Hard to tell.
There's nothing "obvious" about funding SS & Medicare, either. ("Obviously" I'm not a big fan of that word.) One tax has a salary cap on its tax receipts, the other does not. One has widespread fraud, the other not so much. Both have been repetitively tinkered with over the years, and their projected futures have the same "tinkering" assumptions that produce dramatically different outcomes.
This word problem also leaves out the issues of automation, rising worker productivity, immigration (including illegals), and the gray economy (unreported cash transactions).
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
06-09-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#18
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
It all starts with #3. The median US income is slightly above $40k, that's $1.6 million gross for a 40 year working career. Accumulating $1 million on that income seems extremely challenging.
I don't think "be self employed" is a great plan. I'd guess that self employment raises the volatility of results. Sure, you're more likely to end up a millionaire, you're also more likely to end up broke.
|
|
|
06-09-2011, 02:33 PM
|
#19
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords
I'm still looking for the downside of slower population growth.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nords
The way the discussion is framed, sure. But the only "fact" in that paragraph is that as population growth slows, the remaining population is older.
It's not as simple as it seems. Your framing of the other issues glosses over some "problems"-- a lack of wage growth compared to inflation over the last 25 years, lower taxes, higher chronic unemployment, the older working for longer years, and expanding social programs that are part of Social Security and Medicare. So while "X" may be 2:1 in one generation under one set of rules, it may be 5:1 in another generation with another set of rules. Hard to tell.
There's nothing "obvious" about funding SS & Medicare, either. ("Obviously" I'm not a big fan of that word.) One tax has a salary cap on its tax receipts, the other does not. One has widespread fraud, the other not so much. Both have been repetitively tinkered with over the years, and their projected futures have the same "tinkering" assumptions that produce dramatically different outcomes.
This word problem also leaves out the issues of automation, rising worker productivity, immigration (including illegals), and the gray economy (unreported cash transactions).
|
The issue isn't just SS and Medicare. IF slower population growth means slower economic growth, then private investment returns shrink. (I'd be skeptical of buying stock in a company with declining sales.) In the end, somebody has to produce all the stuff that retirees consume.
It's true that demographics aren't destiny. We could have slow population growth with high productivity growth. But, unless you believe that slow population growth causes higher productivity growth, that would be just a happy coincidence.
|
|
|
06-09-2011, 04:06 PM
|
#20
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hooverville
Posts: 22,983
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewer12345
There is a very strong economic disincentive to have children. I think this is unfortunate and will ultimately impact demographics quite strongly.
|
Already is doing so. Look at the composition of births, or elementary school enrollments.
The two Eurpean nations with native populations replacing themselves are Sweden and France- and France is historically a low birth country.
But both of these countries now make it easy for a woman to have children and keep a full time job, or at least easier.
I am reading a very interesting book called "Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?", by Eric Kaufmann. He shows what groups are growing rapidly by endogenous increase. Muslims of course, but also Mormons, Hutterites, Pentcostals, etc., because these groups provide moral and human support for families. Very interesting is that Israel is becoming a religious nation. Zionism was a secular and nationalistic movement, and Israel a secular state. However, in 2008 46% of primary school pupils studied either in Arab schools, or in ultra-othodox Jewish schools.
These giant population waves will change our world.
I have two sons, they both want children, as do their wives. One of them has enough money for a full time nanny, so they have kids. The other couple have good professional jobs, one as software developer and one as a commercial lender-but it would be a financial and day to day lifestyle struggle for them to raise children. They are still young, so who knows, but I can see how much easier it is both now and in the future to avoid the effort and expense of rearing children.
I wish I had the money to provide some meaningful help.
Ha
__________________
"As a general rule, the more dangerous or inappropriate a conversation, the more interesting it is."-Scott Adams
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|