|
A Simple Roth Conversion Question
02-15-2010, 01:44 PM
|
#1
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 120
|
A Simple Roth Conversion Question
I am estimating that next year, when I file my federal tax form, my taxable income, after standard deductions and personal exemptions have been taken into account, will be NEGATIVE $13,000. Given that for 2009 a taxable income of $10,000 has zero tax due and assuming this will be the same for 2010, is it correct that I can convert $23,000 from a rollover IRA to a Roth IRA without paying any taxes?
|
|
|
|
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
|
02-15-2010, 02:09 PM
|
#2
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire
Posts: 34,056
|
I would use the tax prep software I used for 2009 as if it were 2010 and do a pretend Roth IRA rollover of $23,000 to see how much tax might be owed.
__________________
Retired in Jan, 2010 at 55, moved to England in May 2016
Enough private pension and SS income to cover all needs
|
|
|
02-15-2010, 11:54 PM
|
#3
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASAP
. Given that for 2009 a taxable income of $10,000 has zero tax due and assuming this will be the same for 2010, is it correct that I can convert $23,000 from a rollover IRA to a Roth IRA without paying any taxes?
|
Second the motion to use tax software/calculator. I'm not sure where you're getting your given above. From the table here, it looks to me like any taxable income is taxed
Reference Room
|
|
|
02-16-2010, 07:54 AM
|
#4
|
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
|
I think you may be double-counting the standard deduction, but without a detailed breakdown I can't be sure.
A married/joint household gets a standard deduction of $11,400 and two personal exemptions totaling $7,300. That means a MFJ household could effectively pay zero federal income tax on normally taxable income up to $18,700. A couple that had (say) $5,000 in interest income as their only income source would have room to do a Roth conversion up to $13,700 without tax liability. Which, in this case, would be a no-brainer.
Plus, from the IRS point of view, there is no such thing as a "negative income," since the usual instructions dictate that if a calculation results in a number less than zero, you enter zero. So your "goal" in that case would be to find more ways to "use" the effective zero tax bracket to make the numbers less negative since the result is the same in the end (zero).
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
|
|
|
02-16-2010, 10:09 AM
|
#5
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
|
agree that there should be a detailed breakdown. There appear to be dual uses of the word "taxable" income in this threadand that is confusing the issue.There is the man-on-the-street "taxable" meaning potentially subject to tax and the more formal "taxable" that means AGI less deductions and exemptions. OP appears to be using the formal def in OP since there is reference to exemptions and deductions but OP may revert to man-on-the-street def in later posts. Not sure tho.
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 08:31 AM
|
#6
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 120
|
OK, a little more detail (numbers updated from original post)...
I am retired and live solely off of my investments. I have no pension or any other type of income. In 2009, my interest and dividends totaled about $9,300. I have some carryover losses from previous years so that gives me $3,000 off of that, making my Adjusted Gross Income (1040 Line 38) $6,300. Subtracting the Standard Deduction of $11,400 and Personal Exemptions of $7,300 yields -$12,400.
I plugged these numbers into Turbo Tax and (as expected) it showed zero tax due. I then "faked" some income and I had to go all the way up to about $19,300 before there was any tax due. As it turns out, this is because of how my taxes were calculated on the Schedule D Tax Worksheet.
So, does all of this mean that I could convert $19,300 of my Rollover IRA into my Roth IRA without paying ant federal tax on it?
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 10:04 AM
|
#7
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASAP
OK, a little more detail (numbers updated from original post)...
I am retired and live solely off of my investments. I have no pension or any other type of income. In 2009, my interest and dividends totaled about $9,300. I have some carryover losses from previous years so that gives me $3,000 off of that, making my Adjusted Gross Income (1040 Line 38) $6,300. Subtracting the Standard Deduction of $11,400 and Personal Exemptions of $7,300 yields -$12,400.
I plugged these numbers into Turbo Tax and (as expected) it showed zero tax due. I then "faked" some income and I had to go all the way up to about $19,300 before there was any tax due. As it turns out, this is because of how my taxes were calculated on the Schedule D Tax Worksheet.
So, does all of this mean that I could convert $19,300 of my Rollover IRA into my Roth IRA without paying ant federal tax on it?
|
It would appear so.
__________________
Only got A dimple, would have preferred 2!
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 11:15 AM
|
#8
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 26,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RASAP
I plugged these numbers into Turbo Tax and (as expected) it showed zero tax due. I then "faked" some income and I had to go all the way up to about $19,300 before there was any tax due. As it turns out, this is because of how my taxes were calculated on the Schedule D Tax Worksheet.
So, does all of this mean that I could convert $19,300 of my Rollover IRA into my Roth IRA without paying ant federal tax on it?
|
Is America a great country or what?!?
You don't even have to "fake" the income in TurboTax. Start with your original (actual) tax data and then tell TurboTax that you want to do a Roth IRA conversion. Give it a 1099-R or plug through a paper copy of form 8606. Depending on the basis in your conventional IRA you might be able to go higher than $19,300.
Many of us ERs convert a little every year to the top of our tax bracket (in my case 15%). The more losses/deductions, the more converted.
__________________
*
Co-author (with my daughter) of “Raising Your Money-Savvy Family For Next Generation Financial Independence.”
Author of the book written on E-R.org: "The Military Guide to Financial Independence and Retirement."
I don't spend much time here— please send a PM.
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 04:37 PM
|
#9
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 120
|
Thanks y'all.
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 06:33 PM
|
#10
|
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,172
|
Did you have 6900 in qualified dividends? (19300 - 12400). That would account for 0 taxes. Will you have the same in qual divs next yr? If so, that
seems like it would work. After 2010, the 0% rate goes away so there will be some tax on those qual divs.
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 07:45 AM
|
#11
|
Recycles dryer sheets
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 120
|
Yep, it was the qualified dividends that allowed me to get to that number. Thanks for all of the help.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Recent Threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
» Quick Links
|
|
|