Join Early Retirement Today
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
ACA complaints at one year
Old 10-01-2014, 01:57 PM   #1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
ACA complaints at one year

NY public radio talk show had a short segment and got some callers complaining about the high deductibles, which results in higher costs for people earning enough not to get too much subsidies but don't get employer-provided coverage:

The Brian Lehrer Show: Obamacare's First Birthday - WNYC

I know high deductible plans seem to be better received here, because it reduces premiums while mostly providing protection against catastrophic events which could drain retirement savings.

The other part of it is that a lot of providers are opting out or wanting to opt out as insurers reduce reimbursement rates. Not clear if this was happening before the ACA but some are alleging that the insurers are using the "cover of Obamacare" to really slam providers.

OTOH, there are stories of some providers gaming the system by billing for services with very minimum or little consent ahead of time by patients.

For instance, a hospital in network insists on assistant surgeons who are out of network and end up billing patients much higher fees than the primary surgeon/doctor with whom the patient had been planning the procedure:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/us/dr ... -well&_r=1

Then there are cases of specialists whose services are tacked onto emergency care at hospitals which are in network but again, allow a lot of "independent contractors" who've opted out of insurers networks, often because they couldn't agree on reimbursement rates. So they get to charge whatever rates they want and patients who receive care at emergency room are often not in a position to consent:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/29/us/co ... ealth&_r=1
explanade is offline  
Join the #1 Early Retirement and Financial Independence Forum Today - It's Totally Free!

Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!

Old 10-01-2014, 03:00 PM   #2
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by explanade View Post
For instance, a hospital in network insists on assistant surgeons who are out of network and end up billing patients much higher fees than the primary surgeon/doctor with whom the patient had been planning the procedure:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/us/dr ... -well&_r=1
I have a friend that had a brain tumor removed. She went through all the pre-approval process with her insurance company and the medical facility before the surgery (she had researched the surgeon she wanted and traveled across the US to have him do the surgery). She got a $10K bill from another surgeon who was in the OR assisting her primary surgeon. The assisting surgeon was not in-network. She had no idea there was even going to be an assisting surgeon and had no idea who was in the OR during surgery, outside of her primary surgeon.

Just another example of how difficult it is for any one patient to control costs in our system.

Every year I keep thinking that it just isn't possible for American families to absorb more increases in their health care costs. And yet every year costs continue to go up at rates greater than inflation or annual income.

I wonder where the breaking point is.
Live Free is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 03:02 PM   #3
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
They could have done this before ACA as well so I don't see ACA as a good scapegoat.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 03:08 PM   #4
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Live Free View Post
I have a friend that had a brain tumor removed. She went through all the pre-approval process with her insurance company and the medical facility before the surgery (she had researched the surgeon she wanted and traveled across the US to have him do the surgery). She got a $10K bill from another surgeon who was in the OR assisting her primary surgeon. The assisting surgeon was not in-network. She had no idea there was even going to be an assisting surgeon and had no idea who was in the OR during surgery, outside of her primary surgeon.

Just another example of how difficult it is for any one patient to control costs in our system.....
If I were her I would offer to pay whatever she would have had to pay if the assisting OR was in-network and not a penny more. I would favor regulation that if you go to an in-network hospital and your doc is in-network that the facility can only bill of in-network unless you are informed and sign off on out-of-network charges. That would nip these jerks in the bud.

There is no way a consumer can sort this out ahead of time - the facility has to do it and pay the consequences if they screw it up.
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 03:29 PM   #5
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
Quote:
Originally Posted by pb4uski View Post
They could have done this before ACA as well so I don't see ACA as a good scapegoat.
May be true but there's some suggestion that the ACA has caused insurers offering plans on the exchanges to really push reimbursement rates down, causing more doctors to opt out of networks.

I would think though that these kind of billing practices didn't just spring up in the past year. Plus, I'm sure there are consultants advising doctors on how and when to set themselves up as independent contractors and making themselves available at in-network hospitals and facilities.

Twenty years ago, I had knee surgery and the bill for the surgery plus a 2 or 3 day stay at a hospital came up to around $20k IIRC. Some of the items being billed were really crazy, like hundreds of dollars for crutches.

I don't recall having to pay anything under my employer coverage but the itemized bill from the hospital was sobering.
explanade is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 05:51 PM   #6
Recycles dryer sheets
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 392
I think it's actually a little different - more plans are offered and have not signed up that many doctors yet, or doctors are pushing back because of the admin load of yet more insurers. They still belong to the main, blue cross, united health, etc, just not the newest ones. I live in Mass where we have had a version of ACA for a long time - but a bunch of new "insurers" are in the market (since ACA) and when you look for doctors, they don't have many. Most of these are in the low end pricing wise. I am not sure if this will change or these low cost insurers will end up like a private medicaid. If people pick the lowest cost plan, they will be in for a lot of pain.

Medicaid has very low reimbursement rates, and many doctors do not accept it. This has always been an issue.
BellBarbara is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 05:59 PM   #7
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Palma de Mallorca
Posts: 1,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Live Free View Post
I have a friend that had a brain tumor removed. She went through all the pre-approval process with her insurance company and the medical facility before the surgery (she had researched the surgeon she wanted and traveled across the US to have him do the surgery). She got a $10K bill from another surgeon who was in the OR assisting her primary surgeon. The assisting surgeon was not in-network. She had no idea there was even going to be an assisting surgeon and had no idea who was in the OR during surgery, outside of her primary surgeon.
Only $10K? She got away lightly, compared to this guy...
BigNick is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 07:40 PM   #8
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Live Free View Post
I have a friend that had a brain tumor removed. She went through all the pre-approval process with her insurance company and the medical facility before the surgery (she had researched the surgeon she wanted and traveled across the US to have him do the surgery). She got a $10K bill from another surgeon who was in the OR assisting her primary surgeon. The assisting surgeon was not in-network. She had no idea there was even going to be an assisting surgeon and had no idea who was in the OR during surgery, outside of her primary surgeon.

Just another example of how difficult it is for any one patient to control costs in our system.

Every year I keep thinking that it just isn't possible for American families to absorb more increases in their health care costs. And yet every year costs continue to go up at rates greater than inflation or annual income.

I wonder where the breaking point is.
Did she consent to have an "assisting surgeon"? Was the need for 2nd surgeon due to a surprising new finding or an emergency situation? Was the procedure so complex that it routinely would require a 2nd surgeon? If not, I would think she would be justified in telling the 2nd surgeon to buzz off and dispute/refuse the bill. Or threaten to sue the second surgeon for assault, since (apparently) that she had not consented to have him/her touch her or even be in the OR during her surgery.
That said, for most procedures I've had the pre-op consent says something to the effect that I was consenting to have 'whateversurgery' performed by or under the direction of 'Dr. X'. IIUC, to ensure that Dr X actually does the surgery you must modify that consent clause to state specifically that you consent to have ONLY Dr X perform the procedure unless there is an emergency or specific unforeseen circumstances. If I were traveling cross-country for surgery I would make damn sure this issue was crystal clear before I even left home.
ERhoosier is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 07:49 PM   #9
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
I believe one of the NYT articles linked above talks about certain hospitals insisting on the second surgeon, over the objections of the primary surgeon.

Sounds like these independent contractors will not go away with the bills, whether or not the insurance pays. That means they'll pursue the patients.
explanade is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 08:33 PM   #10
Recycles dryer sheets
Rosie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sac suburb
Posts: 437
Look at the bright side, if this were pre-ACA she would have still been billed for the assisting surgeon. This stuff was going on well before the ACA.

But then, were this pre-ACA and if she was on her own insurance (not thru an employer), her insurance provider would most likely have cancelled her policy, because there was nothing prohibiting the insurance co from doing so, and she was clearly costing them money.

And then, she would have truly been up sh!t creek because no other insurance carrier would touch her.

Just sayin.
Rosie is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 08:33 PM   #11
Dryer sheet aficionado
steelhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36
In California, my understanding is that balance billing an insured patient for emergency room care by an out-of-network physician is illegal.

Kaiser has a chart listing the various state approaches. State Restriction Against Providers Balance Billing Managed Care Enrollees | The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
steelhead is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 08:39 PM   #12
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
The NY Times reporter who wrote the articles appeared on a talk show. She noted that NY state is also instituting a law next year which will make it illegal to bill over in-network rates in emergency rooms.

May cause premiums to go up.
explanade is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 08:48 PM   #13
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
We had to pay out of network costs for a surgery last year. Out of network charges at in network hospitals have been a big issue in U.S. health care well before the the affordable care act became law. In our case it wasn't an emergency but how do you shop around for medical services you don't even know you need and then they are performed in the hospital OR while you are unconscious? The whole process is a scam to consumers.

We got the insurance to pay a bit more and then negotiated to pay around half the balance. If the bill had been higher I would have hired a claims specialist to try to negotiate a lower payment.
daylatedollarshort is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 08:56 PM   #14
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Al in Ohio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,118
So after reading through most of this thread, I fail to see how the majority of these concerns are related to the ACA and not just health care insurance issues that were previously and would have been ongoing problems in our system regardless of implementation of the ACA.


Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum
__________________
Ohio REFI PE ENG and Investor as of 2016
Al in Ohio is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 09:05 PM   #15
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,422
There seems to be a suggestion that the ACA causes insurers on the exchanges to push down reimbursement rates, causing more providers to be out of network, leading to alternate ways for providers to boost their incomes.

The insurer that I had with employer coverage also offers plans in the CA exchange. But their provider networks are different. The PCP I used to have under Anthem Blue Cross is not in the network of the BC ACA plans in the CA exchange.
explanade is offline  
Old 10-01-2014, 09:18 PM   #16
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9,358
There is one political party trying to repeal the ACA so there are lots of suggestions about the shortcomings. Have you read anything with hard numbers about the out of network problem bigger than it was, other than being bigger because now millions more people have health insurance?
daylatedollarshort is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 05:30 AM   #17
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al in Ohio View Post
So after reading through most of this thread, I fail to see how the majority of these concerns are related to the ACA and not just health care insurance issues that were previously and would have been ongoing problems in our system regardless of implementation of the ACA. ....
+1 unless one has an axe to grind....
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 05:36 AM   #18
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
donheff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 11,317
I agree with others that the practices cited are flaws in the US system not new to the ACA. As pb4uski notes, this could be nipped in the bud with regulations in a heartbeat. All we need is a Congress that wants to improve the system rather than makes points with their bases for elections.
__________________
Idleness is fatal only to the mediocre -- Albert Camus
donheff is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 05:49 AM   #19
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
ziggy29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Oregon Coast
Posts: 16,483
There are certainly some unintended negative consequences of the ACA, but I think some providers and others are using it as cover -- as an excuse -- to do what they wanted to do anyway but now have some "justification" for doing so.

And the usual talking heads will spin it out of control and remove any discussion on how to make it better and turn it into an ideological crusade one way or the other. Kind of a shame, really. And until we have a Congress that is willing to work to fix the aspects that both parties agree need fixing, rather than trying to simply preserve or repeal the status quo to appease their respective party bases, it will continue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by donheff View Post
As pb4uski notes, this could be nipped in the bud with regulations in a heartbeat. All we need is a Congress that wants to improve the system rather than makes points with their bases for elections.
In other words, this.
__________________
"Hey, for every ten dollars, that's another hour that I have to be in the work place. That's an hour of my life. And my life is a very finite thing. I have only 'x' number of hours left before I'm dead. So how do I want to use these hours of my life? Do I want to use them just spending it on more crap and more stuff, or do I want to start getting a handle on it and using my life more intelligently?" -- Joe Dominguez (1938 - 1997)
ziggy29 is offline  
Old 10-02-2014, 05:55 AM   #20
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso)
Give me a forum ...
pb4uski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sarasota, FL & Vermont
Posts: 36,263
I bet "we" (the members of this forum) could come to a consensus on some improvements that would have a positive impact right quick. If only Congress and the President would agree to make us king for a day!!
__________________
If something cannot endure laughter.... it cannot endure.
Patience is the art of concealing your impatience.
Slow and steady wins the race.

Retired Jan 2012 at age 56
pb4uski is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACA when one has no income and is living off of after tax cash reserves Tandemlovers Health and Early Retirement 65 09-03-2013 10:06 AM
WiFi All In One Printer - which one to buy Disappointed Other topics 18 05-09-2013 06:35 PM
Healthcare ACA subsidies appear to depend on multi-year income pixelville FIRE and Money 21 03-14-2013 09:01 PM
One Down & One to Go! Col. Klink Hi, I am... 12 07-26-2011 06:05 PM

» Quick Links

 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 AM.
 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.